 Free Online Articles Directory |
|||||
Home Page  Richard A. Neifeld |
|||||
 |
 
Richard Neifeld, Ph.D.
Patent AttorneyEmail address: general@neifeld.com
Education
J.D. - The George Washington University Law School - 1994
Ph.D. - Rutgers University (Solid State Physics) - 1985
B.S./B.A. - University of Rochester (Physics and Mathematics)(Cum Laude and Honors) - 1980
Experience
Neifeld IP Law P.C. - 2002
Partner in the IP law firm of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, PC. - 1996
Patent Attorney - 1994
Patent Agent - 1992
Patent Technical Consultant - 1990
Staff Scientist for the U.S. Army's Laboratory Command - 1986
Post-doctoral Fellow, Rutgers University - 1985-1986
Former chair of the Interference Committee and current chair of the Services Subcommittee of the Interference Committee of the American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association (AIPLA). Member of the AIPLA, American Bar Association, Maryland Patent Lawyers Association, and the Patent Information Users Group. Extensive experience in "specialty matters" in the U.S. patent office, such as appeals, petitions, reexaminations, reissues, public protests, and extensive experience in foreign prosecution, and interferences and related litigation. Extensive experience in due diligence work, including investigations, database searching, and opinions.
Admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Virginia State Courts, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
Widely published in IP law publications, frequent lecturer to patent attorneys on patent law topics, and an active member of the patent bar associations. Founder and moderator for the popular "patentinterference" group on the groups.yahoo.com/group/patentinterference web site, which is a forum for general information on patent law and practice with a focus on patent interference issues.
Co-founder of the www.PatentValuePredictor.com automated patent valuation service, co-inventor of the underlying macro-economic model for valuing patents, and programmer of some of the code powering the automated valuations.
Five years of scientific research in applied physics areas of electro-optics, III-V materials, microwaves, vacuum deposition technology, superconductors, and electronics directed towards the U.S. Army's electronics, communication, and signal processing needs.
Sort By: Date | Popularity
Can you Sue "the State" for Patent Infringement?Review of case law regarding protecting patents from infringement by the state. Strategies for Preparing for a Patent InterferencePreparing for a successful patent interference and clues one winning. Comments on United States Patent Assignment InformationThe text below is a copy of an email that I sent the Patent Interference User's Group (PIUG) on November 4, 2003, regarding United States Patent Assignment Information. My email was in response to a chain of emails discussing contents and accuracy of assignment information provided by the commercial database providers. Electronic Notebooks and the Requirements to Prove Date of Invention in Patent InterferencesThis paper contains an excerpt of an email I sent to the PIUG (Patent Information User's Group) email distribution list on November 30, 2003. A Supplemental Note on the Medical Practitioner's Actimmunity from liability from patent infringment Patent Valuation From a Practical View Point, and Some Interesting Patent Value Statistics From the Patentvaluepredictor ModelA review of how to treat patents from a financial and tax reporting standpoint. What Any Decision Maker Needs to Know About Patent ProtectionThis paper explains the basic information a decision maker needs to know regarding patents. There are certain concepts the understanding of which is a prerequisite for this topic. Can you Use a Patent Application Filing in Order to Obtain a Foreign Filing License for "technical Data" ?Can You Use a Patent Application Filing in Order to Obtain a Foreign Filing License for "technical data" ? The Changes to the United States Prior Art Law ImplementedThe Changes to the United States Prior Art Law Implemented by PL 108-453 Enacted December 10, 2004. PL 108-453 reduces the scope of prior art against qualifying claimed inventions. Legal entities can take advantage of the benefits of PL 108-453 with appropriate actions, and such entities may want to promptly review the research related agreements and take suitable action now. Review and Analysis of Ebay Inc. V. Mercexchange, Llc,Review and Analysis of eBay Inc. v. Mercexchange, LLC, No. 05-130, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 126 S. Ct. 1837; 164 L. Ed. 2d 641; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 3872; 74 U.S.L.W. 4248; 78 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1577, Decided May 15, 2006
|
|
|||
|
Article Categories
|
 |
||||
 Sign up for our email newsletterReceive updates, enter your email below
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (5.19, 8) |
|||||
