Past Performance Fails to Predict Future Performance
Copyright (c) 2009 Success Performance Solutions
Yogi Berra once said, "the future ain't what it used to be."
While I'll be the first to admit that quoting Yogi for wisdom's sake may lack credibility, this particular quote is quite relevant and meaningful today, especially for hiring managers, business owners, boards of directors, and anyone who is in the position to hire or promote an employee.
Up until recently many employees were hired and promoted based on a simple theory: past performance is a good predictor of future performance.
When the world was more predictable and change occurred over decades and not days or even minutes, past performance could be expected to lead to future success. That premise was based on a future environment that would be similar to the previous one.
In today's world, that assumption is wrong. Predicting performance based on the past is iffy at best and often disastrous. You can just read the headlines about failed executives, financial gurus, and business super-stars who crashed and burned and it becomes readily apparent that past success does not guarantee future performance. What worked in the past could be the recipt for failure in the future.
Hiring or promoting on past performance works if the environment in which the employee is expected to perform remains constant. In today's world, you'd have to be doing business in a cave located in a remote location in the world that is disconnected from all communication to do that. What business isn't affected in some way by the economy, technology, consumer behavior, demographics, government regulations, globalization, and so on.
For every small change in the environment, past performance becomes less of a valid predictor of future performance. Even a small change in individual compensation (either more or less) affects how an individual might value the job or opportunity and consequently improve or dull performance.
And few jobs are getting any easier. Responsibilities are more complex. Change is happening at a faster pace. All employees are being asked to make difficult decisions under increasing pressure more quickly. Often the employee is crushed under the the inflow of information. Other times he is being asked to make quick decisions with inadequate, inaccurate, or paradoxical information. He or she is expected to not only keep up but differentiate between fact and fiction. Decisions often must often be made on the spot before all the information can be processed or before it is even available. We live in a time of unprecedented change, ambiguity and paradox which nearly negates any reliance on past performance for employee selection.
Past performance as a predictor of future performance just doesn't work anymore. Hiring managers, board of directors and small business owners make terrible and costly mistakes relying on the past to move forward.
The new formula for predicting future performance is this:
Past Performance + Capacity + Potential = Future Performance
Relying on past performance to predict future success may be as much a predictor of failure as it is the crystal ball to see future success moving forward. It's not experience or education that matters anymore but the skills and abilities thast the individual used and developed during the experience that counts. What are the transferable skills that this employee developed and now owns that can be applied to new situations and during challenging circumstances?
In addition to these skills (often referred to as competencies), general mental abilities must be considered. If the complexity and pace requirements for a new role is more intense (which is generally the case), the employee will need to rely more upon excess mental, emotional and physical capacity than he/she did in the past.
What does this mean for hiring managers, management and directors?
Resumes are less relevant than ever. Where the candidate or employee has been and what they've done no longer are valid predictors of where hs or she is going in the future.
Behavioral interviewing just got a lot tougher. It's been well documented that the traditional interview is no longer a reliable tool for predicting performance. There are too many variables including the lack of training on the part of the managers and the preparedness of the candidates. It has become more the rule than the exception that the candidates spend more time preparing for the interviews and managers prepare interviewing.
It's skills and potential that count. Previous experience in the same industry or education from a top school no longer are tickets to success. From the recruitment ad to managing performance must be laser focused on screening and developing core competencies that lead to reliable and sustainable success. These skills (problem solving, analytical thinking, leading others, planning and organizing) are job specific, company specific, or even industry specific. They are transferable to any task, project or environment. Technical knowledge is still relevant but it merely creates a baseline for discussion. How and if the knowledge can be applied in the future is what hiring managers need to find out.
To our clients we recommend a balanced approach for selection. The formula is simple:
1/3 experience/education + 1/3 interview + 1/3 psychometric assessment = job fit
where the resume and interview help you the critical KSAs (knowledge, skills and abilities) that the individual used in his previous experiences. The psychometric tests then play a dual role in candidate assessment: (1) is the individual's innate talent consistent with his or her past success which may give insight if it can be repeated (or was he or she just in the right place at the right time)? (2) what is this individual's potential and capacity to apply and grow these skills to meet future demand.
Relying on past performance as a predictor for future success is a ticking time bomb. It is no longer the path or outcome that matters as much as the decisions made and knowledge gained during the experience that counts. The bar has been raised to hire and promote qualified people.
Is your organization ready?
(ArticlesBase SC #906453)
Article Tags:
past performance
,future success
,performance
,behavioral interview
,competencies
,reliable predictor
,employee selection
,hiring
,psychometric tests
The Future of Factory Performance Divisions of Car Manufacturers
Leo Parente joins Matt Farah this week in the Garage419 studio to recap the 2009 12 Hours of Sebring as well as the future of factory-backed performance divisions of the major car manufacturers. - Garage419 (10:25)
How to Adhere To Your Stop
This video from Lightspeed Trading's Trader Talk Series contains advice from a successful trader on how to minimize risks, monitor future performance and seize opportunities. (03:15)
How to Cut, Copy and Paste With the Standard Toolbar in Dreamweaver CS3
In this Dreamweaver CS3 tutorial, learn how to perform the basic formatting functions of cut, copy and paste using the buttons on the standard toolbar. (01:38)
iPhone 3GS Review - Part 2
Part 2, New Apple iPhone 3Gs features & information. New funcations include. Faster internet & performance, 3.0mp Camera, Video Camera, Voice Control, Compass, Cut Copy & Paste, MMS, Voice Memos. (07:11)
Star Trek Online The Future Past - Part Two
In Part 2 of Atari and Cryptic Studios backstory video series for Star Trek Online, the war-like military movements of the Klingons are chronicled. (03:21)
Texas is the second biggest state in the USA, both in terms of size and population. And, it is the state which consumes the maximum energy in the whole continent. Besides this, this is the only state which produces the maximum energy from various sources. Overall, Texas is a giant producer as well as consumer of energy resources.
Energy has become one of the basic requirements of life, in lieu with a good home, a good job and a good car. When every electronic appliances and gadget needs energy, you should be ready to find the ways to save money while choosing the right energy provider.
Business has literally no boundaries. It is one factor which unites all the divided regions and hides the border which is meant for political purposes. However, one fact which can not be overlooked while managing your global business is the need to understand the local language. This can be attributed as a key to success for your business. Unless the local needs and requirements are closely analyzed, the dream of a successful cross-continent business is incomplete.
There usually is no shortage of critics when organizations flounder. Initial signs are the financials. Part of the cause may be the economy. The most significant cause is the cultural health of the company. Arrogance, greed and a disregard for the truth are organization culture failures. There are at least 4 bedrock principles for the courageous who want to change their culture.
In this review, you will learn 4 essential Tips to choose the best online business program that is Maverick Money Makers.
I had just gotten the CEO position. The company was bleeding red ink, and we didn't have a lot of time to make changes. One for sure, I needed to complete my own assessment of what was going on. A clear picture of strengths, gaps, blind spots of the organization. These are lived, practical, and hard proven steps which work.
As the term globalization is taking a new shape, and occupying the entire dimension of business domain, it is essential and imperative to manage cross-country clients; more effectively and efficiently. And, as the competition is always with the local resources, you need to understand, comprehend and analyze their language along with their business needs and expectations.
You have the idea and you have the motivation, but do you have the money? The credit environment right now stinks and you aren't thrilled with the idea of applying for business loans. Fortunately, you have other options for raising seed capital. If you are creative-minded and determined, you can...
From cell phones and texting to religion and manners, almost 8 in 10 people believe there is a major difference in the point of view of younger and older Americans, according to a new study released in June 2009. This is the highest spread since 1969.
Management is at a crossroads. An overabundance of resumes, creating what I've called the "resu-mess," is prompting employers to change the way they recruit, receive and review applications and interview candidates.
In nearly all cases, the annual review has little to do with performance but a lot to do with salary. The review meeting has become little more than a ritual. It's the once a year sit-down where an entire year of success and failures are boiled down into a few minutes conversation.
This article highlights how different people might value positively or judge negatively social networking in their lives.
I wondered how different behavioral styles (D-I-S-C) might affect an individual's response to social networking.
Up until recently many employees were hired and promoted based on a simple theory: past performance is a good predictor of future performance. When the world was more predictable and change occurred over decades and not days or even minutes, past performance could be expected to lead to future success. That premise was based on a future environment that would be similar to the previous one. In today's world, that assumption is wrong.
An overabundance of resumes is prompting employers to change the way they review applications and interview candidates. For individuals in search of a new job or career, it is as easy as Copy, Paste, and Submit. It is fair to say that reviewing and processing these resumes is like having eight lanes of traffic exiting onto a two-lane side-street. This translates into a resu-mess bottlenock at the hiring tollgate.
The Attitude Virus seems to be everywhere. We know that there are lots of layoffs, morale is down, and productivity is suffering. We see the symptoms every day as rudeness, poor service, lack of motivation, and increased job stress. Managers feel the pain of the long-term effects of the Attitude Virus with employee turnover, lost productivity, customer complaints, increased worker and consumer liability, and a drain on profits.

