The Power of Words in DWI Case
"The Shack, The Hut, and The RAMs," so what's really in a name? Apparently alot. I can remember in the 70s (yes the 1970s) when Radio Shack had a battery club for kids. They would give you a free battery (any size) once a month when you showed them your Radio Shack Battery Card. I grew up with Radio Shack. I built my own radio, thought my 8 track was state of the art fidelity, and knew how to hook up my cars with equalizers, power amps, and speakers. As to The Hut, well I grew up in Brooklyn, eating Pizza Hut, and calling it "Pizza" was an insult to every Italian on the planet. We used to say that's cardboard wit cheese.
What you name something definitely creates an image, an identity, and an emotion. Think of the words, the Defendant, versus the Accused, versus John. You can almost feel the charge on the words lessen as you go along.
My profession gives me a keen interest in words, whether on paper or spoken. I have a deep respect not only for language but for communication. How you say something is just as important as what you say. Saying, "I love my wife" or "I lovvvve my wife" can mean two entirely different things. Am I sarcastic? Am I sincere? Am I being truthful?
As a DWI trial lawyer, I first seek to humanize my client in the Courtroom. He has a name, a family, a job, and a place in this world. For people on a jury to see him or her "like" themselves they must be able to relate (empathy is powerful stuff) to them. As in the sense of "there but for the grace of God go I." Could I be in his or her shoes right now? Jury Empathy is powerful stuff.
To the Government and their lawyer (yes the dreaded "government lawyer"), also known as the prosecutor, or to some not so kind, the persecutor, they seek to dehumanize people. Much easier to call someone a criminal, a crook, and find them guilty if they are seen as less than human. Therefore, they are not at all like you and need to be punished for their mistakes. Perceptions are really what we are after, much like The Shack and The Hut want to change the public's perception. Who are these companies? Who are these people? They are nothing more or less than what we assign to them.
In a DWI Trial the opinion of the arresting officer is the State's evidence and proof. Do we agree with them when they say our client failed their tests? To me, The Field Sobriety Tests now become the Roadside Agility Maneuvers (the RAMs).
You can't study for them. Afterall, how can you really call something a test if you don't know what's on it or how it is graded or if it is scored with "clues."
Words can hurt, words can heal, and sometimes words can even determine guilt or innocence.
Questions and Answers
Article Tags:
dwi
,dui
,drunk
,driving
,new
,york
,jury
,case
,evaluation
,criminal
,defense
,lawyer
,jury instructions
,trial
When attacking a NY DWI charge we must first begin by looking at what the District Attorney (the Prosecutor) needs to prove. Beginning with the end in mind means understanding legal burdens. Much like a football game, the best defensive strategies must be tailored to the opposition's offense.
This article explore the realities behind the evaluation of a New York DWI case. You will be guided through this case evaluation process with focused questions from a DWI attorney's mindset to assess the facts. The evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of any drunk driving case hinges upon specific patterns of facts and their potential interpretation by a Jury.
Our office receives numerous inquiries about withdrawing a plea based on a variety of grounds. The underlying reason is that the potential client believes that the terms of the plea are unfair. Sometimes the potential client believes his or her prior counsel provided ineffective assistance because little or no investigation was performed of various defenses or there was a proper basis for an arrest.
In Colorado, common traffic violations and points assessments can have serious consequences for most drivers.
An experienced DUI Defense lawyer can help you understand what you are up against and the fines you may be required to pay. A Jacksonville DUI lawyer mostly deals with DUI matters and knows the process inside and out - including options that a public defender may not tell you.
Leading criminal defense lawyer explains why you should say no to breathalyzer and field sobriety tests.
San Antonio is one of the most visited cities in the state of Texas (The United States) and the drunk driving and DWI law is quietly difficult, so if during the facing charge of serious case you should consult to an experienced lawyer.
The first order of business in any DWI case is dealing with the loss of a driving privilege. Fortunately, New York State does offer hardship, and conditional privileges to those charged with DWI. The best way to obtain these privileges and transition from full to restricted license privileges is fraught with pitfalls. Asking the right questions and evaluating your unique situation early can help you get through this process with less loss of time, money, and aggravation.
On November 18, 2009, Governor Paterson signed into legislation some of the toughest DWI law in the nation. What is the potential impact of this new law upon first time offenders? What DWI consequences are not spelled out but are clearly going to apply to first time DWI offenders?
What does your DWI Defense attorney believe? Does he believe that the breath test is a very accurate, reliable, scientific, and valid measure of blood alcohol concentration? Does he believe that field sobriety tests are fair? Does he believe that the police officer's opinion, and his report are the truth? I have met many attorneys whose belief systems are defeatist. They are sunk before they even begin. How important is what your attorney believes?
When attacking a NY DWI charge we must first begin by looking at what the District Attorney (the Prosecutor) needs to prove. Beginning with the end in mind means understanding legal burdens. Much like a football game, the best defensive strategies must be tailored to the opposition's offense.
