Virginia Illegal Gambling Enterprise Code 18.2-328 Maryland Massachusetts Lawyers Laws Criminal Defense Lynchburg
Carroll Eugene Turner, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Supreme Court of Virginia
226 Va. 456
The officer picked up the pieces of paper, which, upon later analysis, were found to be numbers racket betting slips. When Turner was searched, he was found in possession of cash and a large sheet of paper with numbers written on it. An F.B.I. Special Agent as an expert in numbers operations, testified on behalf of the Commonwealth testified that in his opinion they constituted records of a gambling operation. He also testified that the documents found on Turner showed that he was "at least" a "pick up man" or "bagman." The expert further testified that a "bagman" served the operation by picking up wagering slips prepared by a person who collects the bets and by turning them over to the person who delivers the slips to the numbers office, bank, or clearing house. Defendant was convicted in a Jury Trial of operating an illegal gambling enterprise under Virginia Code § 18.2-328.
Whether the evidence was insufficient to convict the defendant of being an operator within the meaning of the statute?
The court held that "though Turner was convicted under Virginia Code § 18.2-328, the focus of our analysis is upon Virginia Code § 18.2-325 which defines the word "operator," a term crucial to the offense defined in Virginia Code § 18.2-328. The Commonwealth does not contend that Turner financed, managed, supervised, directed, or owned all or part of the numbers operation the investigation disclosed. Instead, the Commonwealth's entire case against Turner is based on the contention that the evidence showed he conducted in part the business of the numbers operation. In essence, the Commonwealth reads the word "conducts" to mean "engages in" or "participates in." We think the Commonwealth's position is at odds with the readily discernible legislative intent. There are at least three ways to ascertain the legislative intent concerning this statute: (1) by adopting the usual meaning of the word "conduct," (2) by applying the meaning of the word "conduct" as it relates to the other words listed in Virginia Code § 18.2-325 and italicized above, and (3) by analyzing Virginia Code § 18.2-328 along with other statutory provisions with which it is in pari materia. By every approach, the evidence adduced against Turner is insufficient to convict him of the violation with which he was charged. Thus, the Commonwealth's reliance upon the word "conduct" as the basis of Turner's conviction is misplaced. There was no proof that Turner was in command of the criminal gambling operation or that he led the operation or controlled it."
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Questions and Answers
Article Tags:
virginia illegal gambling enterprise code 18 2 328 maryland massachusetts lawyers laws criminal defense lynchburg
Our office receives numerous inquiries about withdrawing a plea based on a variety of grounds. The underlying reason is that the potential client believes that the terms of the plea are unfair. Sometimes the potential client believes his or her prior counsel provided ineffective assistance because little or no investigation was performed of various defenses or there was a proper basis for an arrest.
In Colorado, common traffic violations and points assessments can have serious consequences for most drivers.
An experienced DUI Defense lawyer can help you understand what you are up against and the fines you may be required to pay. A Jacksonville DUI lawyer mostly deals with DUI matters and knows the process inside and out - including options that a public defender may not tell you.
Leading criminal defense lawyer explains why you should say no to breathalyzer and field sobriety tests.
San Antonio is one of the most visited cities in the state of Texas (The United States) and the drunk driving and DWI law is quietly difficult, so if during the facing charge of serious case you should consult to an experienced lawyer.
You can be charged with a felony or misdemeanor in Virginia. Virginia has 6 classed of felonies and 4 classes of misdemeanors.
Dinwiddie County, Virginia is an I-95 speed trap. The number of traffic tickets for speeding & reckless driving tickets handed out in Dinwiddie, Virginia is staggering.
On February 9, 1998 at 2:30 to 3:30 am, defendant drove Victim to a secluded wooded area on Fort Belvoir, Virginia property. Once there, he told her "I am going to bang you up or have sex with you." Victim told him "no" and began to scream. To silence her and overcome her physical resistance, defendant choked her, pulled her hair and bit her lip, causing it to bleed. He also pulled down her pants and then twice forced her to have sexual intercourse with him in the vehicle.
The primary Virginia child porn law is 18.2-374.1:1. The Federal child porn laws used primarily to prosecute defendants in Virginia are 18 U.S.C. 2256 & 18 U.S.C 1466A. The Virginia child porn laws are very strict.
Fairfax County Judges are very strict when it comes to reckless driving tickets. In Virginia, reckless driving is a criminal offense. A ticket for reckless driving is not a simple traffic offense. A reckless driving ticket is a class 1 misdemeanor.
