Certifying Authority
CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000
Section 2 (g) defines certifying authority; it says that certifying authority means a person who has been granted a license to issue a Digital Signature Certificate under Section 24. The provisions under the act include:
Section 19 deals with recognition of foreign certifying authorities.
Subject to the conditions and regulations the Controller may with the prior approval of the Central Government and by notification in the Official Gazette recognise any foreign certifying authority as a certifying authority for the purposes of the act.
Any ESC issued by such foreign certifying authority shall be deemed to be valid under the act. The controller may if satisfied that such certifying authority has contravened any of the conditions or restrictions subject to which it was granted recognition shall by notification and reasons recorded in writing revoke such recognition accorded.
Section 21: Licence to issue Digital Signature Certificates –
(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any person may make an application to the Controller for a licence to issue Digital Signature Certificates.
(2) No licence shall be issued under sub-section (1), unless the applicant fulfills such requirements with respect to qualification, expertise, manpower, financial resources and other infrastructure facilities, which are necessary to issue Digital Signature Certificates as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
(3) A licence granted under this section shall-
a) Be valid for such period as may be prescribed by the Central Government;
b) Not be transferable or heritable;
c) Be subject to such terms and conditions as may be specified by the regulations.
Section 22: Application for license
Every application for license shall be in such form as prescribed by the central government. This application shall be accompanied with the following documents: a certificate practice statement; a statement including the procedures with respect to identification of the applicant; payment of fees not exceeding 25000 as prescribed by the central government and any such document as prescribed by the central government.
Section 24: procedure to grant or rejection of license
After receiving all such documents as prescribed by the Act or the Government, the Controller may grant or reject the application for the license. If such license has been rejected, the applicant should be given a reasonable opportunity to be present his case before rejection.
Section 30: Certifying Authority to follow certain procedures
- They shall make use of such computer hardware, software and procedure that are secure from intrusion and misuse;
- They shall provide a reasonable level of reliability in its services which are reasonably suited for the performance of certain functions.
- They shall adhere to security procedures and ensure that secrecy and privacy of the e-signature is assured.
- They shall be the repository of all ESC's issued under the Act
- They shall publish information regarding its practices, ESC's and current status of each certificate.
- They shall observe any such standard as set out by regulations.
Section 31: Certifying authority to ensure compliance of the Act, etc.
Every Certifying authority shall ensure that every person employed by or engaged by it complies in his course of employment or engagement with the provisions of the Act or the rules and regulations made under it.
Section 34: Disclosure
Every certifying authority is to disclose the following:
- Its ESC
- Any certification practice statement
- Notice of suspension or revocation of its Certifying Authority Certificate
- Any other fact or matter that materially affects the reliability of ESC which that authority has issued and the ability to perform its functions.
If the certifying authority is of the opinion that an event which has occurred may materially or adversely affect the integrity of the computer system, or conditions based on which the ESC was granted, then the authority is required to notify the all affected parties and act in accordance with the certification practice statement which provides for the procedure to be followed in such case.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (CERTIFYING AUTHORITY) REGULATIONS, 2001:
The certifying authorities are regulated by the Information Technology (Certifying Authority) Regulations, 2001. Under these regulations certifying authority means a person who has been granted a license to issue a digital signature certificate under section 24 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Section 3: Terms and conditions of licence to issue Digital Signature Certificate:
Every licence to issue Digital Signature Certificates shall be granted under the Act subject to the following terms and conditions, namely: -
Terms and Conditions
General
- The licence shall be valid for a period of five years from the date of issue.
- The licence shall not be transferable or heritable;
- The Controller can revoke or suspend the licence in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
- The Certifying Authority shall be bound to comply with all the parameters against which it was audited prior to issue of licence and shall consistently and continuously comply with those parameters during the period for which the licence shall remain valid.
- The Certifying Authority shall subject itself to periodic audits to ensure that all conditions of the licence are consistently complied with by it. As the cryptographic components of the Certifying Authority systems are highly sensitive and critical, the components must be subjected to periodic expert review to ensure their integrity and assurance.
- The Certifying Authority must maintain secure and reliable records and logs for activities that are core to its operations.
- Public Key Certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists must be archived for a minimum period of seven years to enable verification of past transactions.
- The Certifying Authority shall provide Time Stamping Service for its subscribers. Error of the Time Stamping clock shall not be more than 1 in 109.
- The Certifying Authority shall use methods, which are approved by the Controller, to verify the identity of a subscriber before issuing or renewing any Public Key Certificate.
10. The Certifying Authority shall publish a notice of suspension or revocation of any certificate in the Certificate Revocation List in its repository immediately after receiving an authorised request of such suspension or revocation.
11. The Certifying Authority shall always assure the confidentiality of subscriber information.
12. All changes in Certificate Policy and certification practice statement shall be published on the web site of the Certifying Authority and brought to the notice of the Controller well in advance of such publication. However any change shall not contravene any provision of the Act, rule or regulation or made there under.
13. The Certifying Authority shall comply with every order or direction issued by the Controller within the stipulated period.
Overall Management And Obligations
- The Certifying Authority shall manage its functions in accordance with the levels of integrity and security approved by the Controller from time to time.
- The Certifying Authority shall disclose information on the assurance levels of the certificates that it issues and the limitations of its liabilities to each of its subscribers and relying parties.
- The Certifying Authority shall as approved, in respect of security and risk management controls continuously ensure that security policies and safeguards are in place. Such controls include personnel security and incident handling measures to prevent fraud and security breaches.
Certificate And Key Management
- To ensure the integrity of its digital certificates, the Certifying Authority shall ensure the use of approved security controls in the certificate management processes, i.e. certificate registration, generation, issuance, publication, renewal, suspension, revocation and archival.
- The method of verification of the identity of the applicant of a Public Key Certificates shall be commensurate with the level of assurance accorded to the certificate.
- The Certifying Authority shall ensure the continued accessibility and availability of its Public Key Certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists in its repository to its subscribers and relying parties.
- In the event of a compromise of the private key the Certifying Authority shall follow the established procedures for immediate revocation of the affected subscribers' certificates.
- The Certifying Authority shall make available the information relating to certificates issued and/or revoked by it to the Controller for inclusion in the National Repository.
- The private key of the Certifying Authority shall be adequately secured at each phase of its life cycle, i.e. Key generation, distribution, storage, usage, backup, archival and destruction.
- The private key of the Certifying Authority shall be stored in high security module in accordance with FIPS 140-1 level 3 recommendations for Cryptographic Modules Validation List.
- Continued availability of the private key be ensured through approved backup measures in the event of loss or corruption of its private key.
- All submissions of Public Key Certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists to the National Repository of the Controller must ensure that subscribers and relying parties are able to access the National Repository using LDAP ver 3 for X.500 Directories.
10. The Certifying Authority shall ensure that the subscriber can verify the Certifying Authority's Public Key Certificate, if he chooses to do so, by having access to the Public Key Certificate of the Controller.
Systems And Operations
- The Certifying Authority shall prepare detailed manuals for performing all its activities and shall scrupulously adhere to them.
- Approved access and integrity controls such as intrusion detection, virus scanning, prevention of denial-of service attacks and physical security measures shall be followed by the Certifying Authority for all its systems that store and process the subscribers' information and certificates.
- The Certifying Authority shall maintain records of all activities and review them regularly to detect any anomaly in the system.
Physical, Procedural And Personnel Security
a) Every Certifying Authority shall get an independent periodic audit done through an approved auditor. Such periodic audits shall focus on the following issues among others :-
i. changes/additions in physical controls such as site location, access, etc;
ii. re-deployment of personnel from an approved role/task to a new one;
iii. appropriate security clearances for outgoing employees such as deletion of keys and all access privileges;
iv. thorough background checks, etc. during employment of new personnel.
b) The Certifying Authority shall follow approved procedures to ensure that all the activities referred to in (i) to (iv) in sub-regulation (a) are recorded properly and made available during audits.
Financial
- Every Certifying Authority shall comply with all the financial parameters during the period of validity of the licence, issued under the Act.
- Any loss to the subscriber, which is attributable to the Certifying Authority, shall be made good by the Certifying Authority.
Compliance Audits
- The Certifying Authority shall subject itself to Compliance Audits that shall be carried out by one of the empanelled Auditors duly authorized by the Controller for the purpose. Such audits shall be based on the Internet Engineering Task Force document RFC 2527 – Internet X.509 PKI Certificate Policy and Certification Practices Framework.
- If a Digital Signature Certificate issued by the Certifying Authority is found to be fictitious or that proper identification procedures have not been followed by the Certifying Authority while issuing such certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be liable for any losses resulting out of this lapse and shall be liable to pay compensation as decided by the Controller.
Section 4: The standards followed by the Certifying Authority for carrying out its functions
(1) Every Certifying Authority shall observe the following standards for carrying out different activities associated with its functions.
1. PKIX (Public Key Infrastructure)
Public Key Infrastructure as recommended by Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document draft-ietf-pkix-roadmap-05 for "Internet X.509 Public Key infrastructure" (March 10, 2000);
2. Public-key cryptography
Based on the emerging Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard P1363 for three families:
- Discrete Logarithm (DL) systems
- Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm (EC) systems
- Integer Factorization (IF) systems;
3. Public-key Cryptography Standards (PKCS)
- PKCS#1 RSA Encryption Standard (512, 1024, 2048 bit)
- PKCS#3 Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Standard
- PKCS#5 Password Based Encryption Standard
- PKCS#6 Extended-Certificate Syntax Standard
- PKCS#7 Cryptographic Message Syntax standard
- PKCS#8 Private Key Information Syntax standard
- PKCS#9 Selected Attribute Types
- PKCS#10 RSA Certification Request
- PKCS#11 Cryptographic Token Interface Standard
- PKCS#12 Portable format for storing/transporting a user's private keys and
- certificates
- PKCS#13 Elliptic Curve Cryptography Standard
- PKCS#15 Cryptographic Token Information Format Standard;
4. Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)
- FIPS 180-1, Secure Hash Standard;
- FIPS 186-1, Digital Signature Standard (DSS);
- FIPS 140-1 level 3, Security Requirement for Cryptographic Modules;
5. Discrete Logarithm (DL) systems
- Diffie-Hellman, MQV key agreement;
- DSA, Nyberg-Rueppel signatures;
6. Elliptic Curve (EC) systems
Elliptic curve analogs of DL systems;
7. Integer Factorization (IF) systems
- RSA encryption, RSA,
- Rabin-Williams signatures;
8. Key agreement schemes
9. Signature schemes
10. Encryption schemes
11. Form and size of the key pairs
(1) The minimum key length for Asymmetric cryptosystem (RSA Algorithm) shall be 2048 for the Certifying Authority's key pairs and 1024 for the key pairs used by subscribers.
(2) The Certifying Authority's key pairs shall be changed every three to five years (except during exigencies as in the case of key compromise when the key shall be changed immediately). The Certifying Authority shall take appropriate steps to ensure that key changeover procedures as mentioned in the approved Certificate Practice Statements are adhered to.
(3) The subscriber's key pairs shall be changed every one to two years;
12. Directory Services (LDAP ver 3)
X.500 for publication of Public Key certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists
i) X.509 version 3 Certificates as specified in ITU RFC 1422
ii) X.509 version 2 Certificate Revocation Lists;
13. Publication of Public Key Certificate.
The Certifying Authority shall, on acceptance of a Public Key Certificate by a subscriber, publish it on its web site for access by the subscribers and relying parties. The Certifying Authority shall be responsible and shall ensure the transmission of Public Key Certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists to the National Repository of the Controller, for access by subscribers and relying parties. The National Repository shall conform to X.500 Directory Services and provide for access through LDAP Ver 3. The Certifying Authority shall be responsible for ensuring that Public Key Certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists integrate seamlessly with the National Repository on their transmission;
14. Public Key Certificate Standard
All Public Key Certificates issued by the Certifying Authorities shall conform to International Telecommunication Union X.509 version 3 standard.
This includes:
- Certificate
- Version
- Serial number
- Signature
- Issuer
- Validity
- Subject
- Subject public key information
- Unique identifiers
- Extensions
- Signature algorithm
- Signature value
15. Certificate Revocation list standard
CRL and CRL Extensions Profile - The CRL contents as per International Telecommunications Union standard
This includes:
- TBC Cert List
- Version
- Signature
- Issuer name
- This update
- Next update
- Revoked certificates
- CRL entry extensions
- Issuing distribution point
- Signature algorithm
- Signature value
Section 4 (2) states that the list of standards in section 4(1) shall be updated at least once a year to include new standards that may emerge from the international bodies. Also if any Certifying Authority or a group of Certifying Authorities brings a set of standards to the Controller for a specific user community, the Controller shall examine the same and respond to them within ninety days.
Section 5:
(1) Every Certifying Authority shall disclose :-
a) its Digital Signature Certificate which contains the public key corresponding to the private key used by that Certifying Authority to digitally sign another Digital Signature Certificate;
b) any Certification Practice Statement relevant thereto;
c) notice of the revocation or suspension of its Certifying Authority Certificate, if any; and
d) any other fact that materially or adversely affect either the reliability of a Digital Signature Certificate, which that Authority has issued by it or the Authority's ability to perform its services
(2) The above disclosure shall be made available to the Controller through filling up of online forms on the Web site of the Controller on the date and time the information is made public. The Certifying Authority shall digitally sign the information.
Section 6: Communication of compromise of Private Key.-
(1) Where the private key corresponding to the public key listed in the Digital Signature Certificate has been compromised, the subscriber shall communicate the same without any delay to the Certifying Authority.
(2) An application for revocation of the key pair shall made in Form online on the web site of the concerned Certifying Authority to enable revocation and publication in the Certificate Revocation List. The Subscriber shall encrypt this transaction by using the public key of the Certifying Authority. The transaction shall be further authenticated with the private key of the subscriber even though it may have already been compromised.
Questions and Answers
Article Tags:
certifying authority
,information technology act
,2000
,digital signature certificate
,license
,information technology certifying authority regulations 2001
Technology development is one of the crucial factors for the development of security market in India. Process of converting physical form into electronic form knows us dematerialization. Due to electronic form share holder can computer their top very easily with speed and safety.
Learn why you must seek out the services of a professional personal injury lawyer when dealing with a legal court case.
Kalkadora Thangkhiew has been serving the area with the highest quality Bankruptcy Attorney and Divorce attorney services for years.
A certain meat processing plant which is owned by New Food Classics, has been investigated to decide if there are any food borne illness victims from this potentially adulterated meat. These news has made the manufacturer of meat products, New Food gone into bankruptcy. However, the US company Sysco bought the potentially tainted meat from New Food Classics and sold it all to one customer.
Do you use your business website for conducting major business operations and making agreements? Or do you merely surf the internet, scouting for information of your liking? If you are into any of these things, it is essential that you know at least the basic framework of most cyber laws in the US.
Fuller Law Firm has been serving the the medical malpractice olympia needs of the area for years. So if you feel you have been mistreated or victimized by the medical field contact us today.

