For legal advice on registered trade marks from solicitors based in London, contact Gillhams Solicitors. Gillhams is an intellectual property law firm, advising on trade marks, copyright and intellectual property law.
When selecting a domain name in the UK, it is primarily registered trade mark rights that dictate whether or not the domain name is available for use in trade and commerce, regardless of whether the domain name is available for registration. Whether or not the use of the domain name infringes a UK trade mark trade mark is another matter.
Suppose the same trade mark is owned and used by independent companies in the United States and the United Kingdom. The United States company might have a website, for example easyfashion.com, which may feature the trade mark “easy fashion”. Does the appearance of the trade mark on the United States site infringe the trade mark registered in the United Kingdom?
Given the world wide accessibility of internet sites and the inevitability that, to return to the above example, the United States website will be viewed by internet users in the United Kingdom, courts have had to consider the question of whether the use of a trade mark on a foreign website infringes the trade mark registered in the United Kingdom.
The starting point for United Kingdom courts is the proposition that infringement in the United Kingdom requires the use of the sign in the course of trade in relation to goods or services in the United Kingdom.
Whether or not a foreign website uses a sign in the course of trade in the United Kingdom is a question of fact that a court must determine having regard to all the circumstances.
In the case of 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd [2002] FSR 12 CA, Buxton LJ rejected the notion that simply placing a mark on a foreign website without more would constitute use in the course of trade in the United Kingdom.
Lord Justice Buxton, in reasoning that something more was required to constitute the requisite use, said:
"the very idea of “use” within a certain area would seem to require some active step in that area on the part of the user that goes beyond providing facilities that enable others to bring the mark into the area. Of course, if persons in the United Kingdom seek the mark on the Internet in response to direct encouragement or advertisement by the owner, the position may be different; but in such case the advertisement or encouragement in itself is likely to suffice to establish the necessary use"
An “active step” which goes beyond the mere placing of a mark on a website and which would result in a finding of use in the course of trade in the United Kingdom would include solicitation of customers and orders in the United Kingdom by the foreign website.
Courts will also look at whether the foreign website has an established trade and customer base in the United Kingdom. Whether or not a foreign website does have a United Kingdom customer base will not of itself determine the issue, but is certainly a relevant factor a court will consider in making its judgment.
Ultimately, the appearance of a mark on a foreign website will only be considered as use in the course of trade in the United Kingdom if, objectively speaking, the website aims at customers in the United Kingdom. Factors to be considered by courts when deciding this issue include whether there is any active solicitation of United Kingdom customers, the extent of the website’s customer base and trade in the United Kingdom and whether any disclaimers or statements exist on the foreign website which prevent sales in the United Kingdom.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A
- Infringement Of Uk Trade Marks By Foreign Domain Names
- Domain Name System and Disputes Involved
- My Product is Better Than Yours…but Can I Say That?
- Developing a Legal Game Plan to Protect Innovation
- Murrieta Business Attorney’s Top Ten Business Signs Your State is Bankrupt
- Ontario Business Attorney’s Top Ten Sarah Palin Recession Proof Businesses
- Rancho Cucamonga Business Attorney’s Top Ten Calls You Don’t Want to Take if You’re Sarah Palin
- Temecula Business Attorney’s Top Ten Business Things That Confuse Sarah Palin About Business




Possible Offenses & Charges – Internet Identity Theft
By: Colin Daives | 27/10/2009Identity theft has been a crime for decades but the Internet has given criminals more options and raised more identity security issues. As a result, new laws are regularly passed in regards to online identity theft. If you've been charged with this type of crime, it's important to understand what you can expect.
Wills and Probate UK
By: Alex Hershmann | 15/10/2009Information about the process of granting probate in England and Wales
Ghaziabad Changing Room Incident Shines Spotlight On Video Voyeurism
By: Neeraj Aarora | 03/10/2009The arrest of famous store room owner at Ghaziabad for allegedly planting secret camera to make clippings of the female customer while using the trial room has shown adverse impact upon our concept of privacy. The peeping cameras are becoming technologically advanced, tiny and easily available at cheaper prices. They can be planted secretly with ease and its pervasive application has contributed to the growing fascination for younger generation obsession with voyeurism.
Cyber Criminal Arrested Through Digital Footprint- An Excellent Job By Special Cell, Delhi Police
By: Neeraj Aarora | 03/10/2009There is lack of security culture amongst the user of computer, computer system, and computer networks. The same is evident from the recent report of Anoushka Shankar (daughter of the legendary music maestro Pandit Ravi Shankar) email hacked into by an offender who took control of some very private photographs stored in the inbox of the email.
DHC STRUCK DOWN TIME LIMIT OF SIX MONTH FOR INVOKING ARBITRATION IN STOCK EXCHANGE DISPUTES
By: Neeraj Aarora | 03/10/2009Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism provided by a stock exchange to resolve disputes between the trading members and between trading members & constituents (i.e. clients of trading members), in respect of trades done on the Exchange. This process of resolving a dispute is faster than other means of redressal by civil courts. Arbitration comes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
High Court of Delhi quashes FIR against Biplab Saha & others in BPO data theft case
By: Anwar A Khan | 24/09/2009In a major move against business issues being camouflaged as criminal complaints under Cyber Law provisions, the High Court of Delhi, India, recently quashed an FIR (First Information Report) in a BPO data theft case against Biplab Saha a leading offshore outsourcing professional.
Computer Forensics In Criminal Defence
By: Jenny Pilley | 02/09/2009There is a lot of coverage within the media about how digital forensics have been used within a court case to prosecute. However, within the British judicial system, someone is innocent until proven otherwise.
Invasion of Privacy? New Precedents Set For Online Right To Publicity
By: Kathryn Carrado | 30/08/2009Reckless Online Posting and Liability Exposure - A Caution For Business Owners
Infringement Of Uk Trade Marks By Foreign Domain Names
By: Leigh Ellis | 08/02/2009 | Cyber LawUK trade marks grant the trade mark owner the exclusive right to use the trade mark in the UK. When the trade mark is used on foreign websites, it is a question of law whether or not the trade mark is infringed under with UK law, thus giving rise to liability for trade mark infringement.
Terms of Business and UK Regulatory Compliance Online
By: Leigh Ellis | 14/09/2008 | National, State, LocalWe find that businesses contact solicitors for two primary purposes. The first is to ensure that their business properly establishes their terms of business and indirectly to comply with regulatory requirements, such as the Data Protection Act, Distance Selling Regulations. Another instance is where a contract has been proposed, or needs to be prepared for a particular transaction, and the legal terminology is beyond the their experience and understanding, due to its technical legal nature.
Remedies for Breach of Contract in the UK
By: Leigh Ellis | 30/08/2008 | National, State, LocalUnder UK law, a variety of remedies are available for the innocent party against the party in breach. In this article, Gillhams Solicitors step through some of the remedies available in litigation under UK law.
Managing Contracts and Liability - Law of Mistake in the UK
By: Leigh Ellis | 30/08/2008 | National, State, LocalMistakes at law may affect the validity of the formation of a contract. The effect of a mistake on the validity of a contract depends on the type and nature of the mistake made. The general rule is that where a mistake has been made by the parties, at common law the contract may be deemed void, as if the contract had never existed. Equity takes a more flexible approach in that contracts containing certain mistakes may be treated as voidable, where either party can terminate the contract. How
Difference Between Privity of Contract, Novation and Assignment Under UK Law
By: Leigh Ellis | 30/08/2008 | Internet LawThe doctrine of privity of contract is the relationship that exists between parties to a contract. Only those parties to the contract are bound by it and are able to enforce the contractual obligations under the contract. The concepts of novation and assignment, although not exceptions to this rule, are contrary to the principles outlined in it and have developed to overcome restrictions imposed by the doctrine.
UK and European Trade Mark Protection and the Law
By: Leigh Ellis | 30/08/2008 | TrademarksThe fundamental purpose and function of trade marks is to provide consumers with the means to demarcate the goods and services of one trader from another. It allows consumers to recognise your products or services as yours alone and thus avoid confusing it with the products or services of a competitor. Trade marks provide an exclusive way in which your goods or services can be identified as originating from you.
Use of Competitors’ Trade Marks and Comparative Advertising in the United Kingdom and Europe
By: Leigh Ellis | 06/07/2008 | Intellectual PropertyOrdinarily use of competitors’ trade marks amounts to a trade mark infringement and/or passing off. However the Trade Marks Act 1994 (‘TMA’) and European legislations legitimise use of competitors’ trade marks provided that the use takes place in a particular way, and certain tests are satisfied.
Terms of Contract and Penalty Clauses in English Law
By: Leigh Ellis | 12/02/2008 | Internet LawRegardless of contracts are formed by email, on a website or verbally, provisions imposing a penalty or forfeiture are unenforceable under English law. Penalties may take the form of an excessive sum to be paid if a party to the contract fails to perform, and forfeiture exists where a contract term purports to relinquish the property of the party in breach to the party not in breach.