Laptop Inspection/Seizure at Border
As technology evolves, so to does government interest. It use to be top secret papers would need to be copied and given to a KGB handler, to get back to Moscow, now, mini-SD chips fit 8+ GB, which can hold thousands of pages of documents. American's have the Fourth Amendment as a shield to protect them from unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment has evolved with technology. See, United States v. Blas, 1990 WL 265179, at *21 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 4, 1990) ("[A]n individual has the same expectation of privacy in a pager, computer, or other electronic data storage and retrieval device as in a closed container.").
However, the Fourth Amendment ceases when you want to enter back into the USA. Every body cavity and computer is open to inspection with little more than reasonable cause. A true border search can be made without probable cause, without a warrant, and, indeed, without any articulatable suspicion at all. The only limitation on such a search is the Fourth Amendment stricture that it be conducted reasonably. Note that the reasonableness calculus is different at the border (i.e., looser) than it is inland. Despite such, when entering the USA, and, for the purposes of this post, a person has the Fifth Amendment as a shield.
In a recent decision in Vermont, In re Boucher, a federal magistrate judge held that the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination protects a suspect against having to reveal the password permitting access to his computer files. The software the defendant used, and which I recommend, besides using file wiping software in conjunction with other counter-forensic measures, is PGP whole disk encryption. Nothing has broken this encryption. The court determined that if Boucher was "forced" to provide the passphrase, then the contents could incriminate Boucher thus violate the Fifth Amendment. You can find the court's opinion here: http://www.volokh.com/files/Boucher.pdf
The end result, if you have material on a computer you do not want inspected, encrypt it. If the government can get a warrant to place spy ware on your computer while 'inspecting it' to reveal your pass phrase, then encrypt the file on a thumb drive.
Of course, if your 'vacation' included taking pictures, then transfer those pix to an encrypted drive and insure the SD card from the camera is securely wiped. In short, for every measure to obtain information, there's a counter-measure. However, if you are doing something while outside of the USA which can attract the Feds, I recommend---DON'T DO IT. Freedom is not free, but stupidity will put the most intelligent in prison.
Questions and Answers
Learn why you must seek out the services of a professional personal injury lawyer when dealing with a legal court case.
Kalkadora Thangkhiew has been serving the area with the highest quality Bankruptcy Attorney and Divorce attorney services for years.
A certain meat processing plant which is owned by New Food Classics, has been investigated to decide if there are any food borne illness victims from this potentially adulterated meat. These news has made the manufacturer of meat products, New Food gone into bankruptcy. However, the US company Sysco bought the potentially tainted meat from New Food Classics and sold it all to one customer.
Do you use your business website for conducting major business operations and making agreements? Or do you merely surf the internet, scouting for information of your liking? If you are into any of these things, it is essential that you know at least the basic framework of most cyber laws in the US.
Fuller Law Firm has been serving the the medical malpractice olympia needs of the area for years. So if you feel you have been mistreated or victimized by the medical field contact us today.
Spoilation of elcectronic evidence can take many forms and result of case dismissal, to a fine. Depending on the amount of notice provide, opportunity to comply with preservatation orders or expectations, Darren Chaker notes courts have grown increasingly hostile toward the party who destroys precious data.
The California Supreme Court issued an opinion allowing police to read text messages on a phone of a person they arrested. People v. Diaz is a run of the mill drug dealing, however allowing police to review text messages will likely be heard later on by a federal court due to Fourth Amendment implications. Nonetheless, this article provides some basic insight on the court opinion, and counter measures to keep private information--private.
Background: A defendant is sentenced to not violate any laws, pay a fine, etc., however the probation officer adds the additional restriction to not leave the state absent written consent by the probation officer. To do otherwise is to violate probation in the eyes of the probation officer. The court took issue with the probation officer's decision. Enjoy, Darren Chaker
Background: A Defendant was charged with making harassing phone calls. After years of litigation, the State admitted it had no evidence Defendant made a single call. Defendant filed a petition to seal and destroy records pursuant to Penal Code Section 851.8. The Defendant now become the Petitioner and must prove factual innocence. In short, a prime method of proving factual innocence is demonstrating it by cutting away at the elements of the crime to prove a crime was not committed.
Miranda v. Clark County seems like a case out of the south during the 1940's. No justice expected or received. However, the Clark County Public Defender's decision to abandon its client resulted in a man spending decades on death row for a crime he didn't commit. This article provides some foundation and discussion on the right to counsel, that is competent counsel.
