Escapeso Realty is a small company in central Texas. Their site has up to date information on the Austin real estate market. It also has statistics on its Austin Texas real estate blog for visitors and a tool that tracks mortgage interest rates.
Recently the news has been dominated by developments with the 700 billion dollar bailout package, and rightfully so. 700 billion is an astronomical sum of money. The first problem is that the 700 billion dollar bailout adds a huge amount of money to the national debt. Not only that, some have hinted that the bailout is so large it could actually lower the US Credit Rating. The second problem is just as serious. There is no guarantee that the bailout will work.
The idea behind the bailout is that by taking on billions of dollars of toxic loans the government hopes to "influence" banks to start lending again. The past attempts of the government to "influence" banks have all failed. The fed lowered the fed rate to influence banks to lower mortgage rates. While the banks were appreciative of lower rates they did not lower mortgage interest rates. In fact after the fed cut rates the banks increased mortgage rates because they saw negative prospects in the housing market. In a similar way, after the US government takes over the toxic loans away from them the banks could continue to see negative prospects in the housing market and therefore would continue to have strict lending practices. The idea of spending 700 billion with no guarantees seems like a poor use of capitol.
When people hear the word "National Bank" the first thoughts are of a socialized banking system. A national bank would not replace the current banking industry. It also does not "introduce" government involvement into the banking industry. With the Fed influencing interest rates and the government rushing in to bailout every bank that runs into problems the government already has a large hand in the banking industry. I don't want to argue whether the government should have a role in the banking industry. Currently the government already has a significant role in the banking/mortgage industry. My argument is that if the government does have a role it should be effective and cost efficient.
A national bank would be a cheaper and more cost effective way to steady the financial markets. To understand how a national bank would work lets first talk a little more about what is currently causing the housing crisis. The mortgage market operates a little like a basketball game. Lenders go from one extreme to another. For awhile lenders will lend to anyone that walks in the door with a pulse. During these periods lenders accept less and less qualified applicants in an attempt to gain market share. Then the lenders get freaked out (often because someone realizes they have been giving out billions in loans to unqualified applicants that are unlikely to pay their mortgages) and lenders run to the other extreme and practice extremely restrictive lending practices (the insurance industry sees the same cycles but that is another topic). If you haven't already guessed currently we are in the second scenario with lenders practicing extremely restrictive lending practices. The problem with the second situation is that such extreme changes shocks the housing market and basically causes a financial crisis. The banks are in a catch 22. If collectively the banks don't lend the housing market will continue to deteriorate. But no one wants to lend because they are worried the housing market will continue to deteriorate because collectively they are not lending. It's kind of like at a party where you don't want to be the first person to jump into the pool because if no one else does you look foolish. Substitute looking foolish with going bankrupt and you kind of see where banks are coming from.
The great depression and the S&L crisis were both basically examples of this same problem. Initially during the great depression the conventional logic was the government should not intervene. As the stock market continued to drop (it dropped over 80% in less than a year) and people realized how bad an economy can get (pretty bad) the idea of government intervention seemed more palatable compared to the alternative.
So now during periods where lenders are freaked the government attempts to "influence" lenders. The problem is its extremely expensive. Currently the government is taking on years and years of bad loans in an attempt to "influence" lenders to loosen their current restrictive lending practices for the next 6 months to pull us out of the housing crisis. This is kind of like trying to influence your local school to spend money on new textbooks by building them a new school. Not only is it ridiculously expensive after you build the new school you have no guarantee they will buy the textbooks. It's not simply a poor use of government funds it's utterly outlandish.
So how would a national bank operate? During periods where banks are giving out loans to everyone that walked in the door the national bank would practice have average lending restrictions with interest rates slightly higher than what is available at most banks and give out very few loans. When the banks became ultra restrictive the bank would again have average lending restrictions. During these periods it would give out more loans.
So the government would not practice the outlandish lending practices we saw during the boom they would not be as restrictive as the banks are now. In fact this would probably do more to influence banks lending practices than the 700 billion giveaway. Remember how we talked about banks not wanting to lend money because no one else was lending money therefore making them nervous about the prospects of the housing market. Knowing that money would always flow provides some stability to the market. Also it would be much less expensive. Having the government provide some loans over the next 6 months with average restrictions during a low point in the market would be much better than taking on years of crappy loans given out during the peak of the market to very unqualified home buyers.
Would some banks go under? Yes. But you know what they should. Bailing out foolish banks that threw caution to the wind and had wildly risky lending practices almost guarantees that we will be faced with another housing crisis in the future. Instead we should allow some of these banks to die. First it prevents these banks without a sense of risk from causing these problems again. Secondly, it influences other banks to exercise more caution during boom times. The bailout sends a message to banks that during the boom they should ignore caution because the government will come in and take all their bad loans away like some kind of bizarre magical bad loan tooth fairy.
I realize this article might bother people that want the government to have no role in the banking/mortgage market. But if we accept that the government already has a role in the banking industry (the possibility of the government taking itself out is pretty much nill for the next decade) to stabilize markets at the least it should do so in a way that is effective and cost efficient.
- Related Articles
- Related Q&A
- Consideration in Finding a Good Real Estate Mortgage
- Real Estate Mortgage
- Real Estate Mortgage Options
- Real Estate Mortgage Terms
- Business Finance and Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Loan Choices
- Brokers or Lenders — Which Do you Want for your Real Estate Mortgage?
- Why You Should Buy Real Estate Now! Low Rates and Prices Guaranteed!
- Creating The Perfect Real Estate Mortgage Application




Mind Boggling Numbers
By: Ernie Fitzpatrick | 15/11/2009We're so far into the economic rabbit hole that we'll never be able to get out, but don't tell anyone!
The Beauty of Competition
By: Keith Brandon | 12/11/2009Competition is the only force to control costs and consequently prices. Corruption in government and giant corporations work together to interfere with fair competition for economic gain. The victims are the U.S. economy and our grandchildren.
Public Bank Energy Investment
By: Andrew Spark | 11/11/2009Investment and grants in clean energy from international development banks and organisations reached $8.3bn in 2007, rising from $6bn in 2006. This number looks set to continue increasing in the coming years.
Spanish Clean Energy Incentives
By: Andrew Spark | 11/11/2009Spain benefits from a Feed in Tariff system. There are also a number of other incentives and laws which are described below by sector:
Gold Sails Past $1,100
By: Ernie Fitzpatrick | 11/11/2009The US$ continues to sink into the Western sunset as gold continues to rise in the East!
The Next Shoe To Drop
By: Ernie Fitzpatrick | 10/11/2009How will Christmas be this year? If the retailers don't get a good one, it may be their last one.
Clean Camera, Clear Capture
By: Felicia luo | 06/11/2009A clean digital camera not only looks better outside, it also work better inside, giving us superior enjoyment.
Clean Camera, Clear Capture
By: Felicia luo | 06/11/2009A clean digital camera not only looks better outside, it also work better inside, giving us superior enjoyment.
Birthday Parties in Austin, Texas
By: Dane | 13/08/2009 | ParentingIdeas for where to celebrate kids birthdays in Austin, Texas
Great Places to vacation in Austin
By: Dane | 13/08/2009 | DestinationsPlaces to vacation with the entire family, right here in beautiful Austin,TX.
Johnson City, Texas
By: Dane | 13/08/2009 | DestinationsJohnson City lies 15 miles north of Austin. This article looks at Johnson City.
The Little City Of San Marcos
By: Dane | 13/08/2009 | Real EstateSan Marcos is a small city and home of Texas State University. This article looks at the city of San Marcos.
The Grove Wine Bar & Kitchen: Austin's New Wine Bar on the Block
By: Dane | 13/08/2009 | Wines & SpiritsAustin's newest wine bar is quickly becoming a favorite among local wine aficionados.
Budgeting 101: A Beginner's Guide
By: Dane | 12/08/2009 | Personal FinanceCreating an accurate budget is important not only because it helps you see where you are financially, but also helps you map out the road to where you'd like to be.
The Recent Introduction Of Raspberry Ants To Texas
By: Dane | 09/06/2009 | EnvironmentThe Rasberry Ant has recently been found in Central Texas. This article looks at the Raspberry Ant and its introduction to Texas.
The Central Texas City of Georgetown
By: Dane | 09/06/2009 | Real EstateGeorgetown is small city lying just north of Austin Texas. This article looks at some of the history and features of Georgetown.