 Free Online Articles Directory |
|||||||
Home Page  News and Society Environment World Population to Crash by 80 Percent, Says Top U.K. Scientist, Part One |
|||||||
 |
World Population to Crash by 80 Percent, Says Top U.K. Scientist, Part One
Some like it hot. According to environmentalist James Lovelock, we'll get plenty of hot between now and the end of the century. "We are so far down the path toward the hottest we have been, since we were 55 million years ago," Dr. Lovelock, who is also a leading atmospheric scientist, told StockInterview in a tape-recorded interview last week, "that as many of us look at it, it's not going to make very much difference what anybody does." In stronger commentary, which he wrote for England's Independent newspaper, this past January, Lovelock warned, "The Earth is about to catch a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years." And we were worrying about another Ice Age? Skeptics might wonder if his 1200-word essay was just book publicity hype. Lovelock's scathing our-world-is-doomed article was published about two weeks before Penguin Books (UK) began selling his latest work, The Revenge of Gaia, in bookstores across the British Isles. He did admit within his newspaper commentary, "This article is the most difficult I have written." While interviewing Dr. Lovelock, during our transatlantic phone conversation, the octogenarian sounded sad with his prediction, but still optimistic, despite his ruthless appraisal of what may lay ahead for the rest of this century. "I see the crunch coming as an opportunity to improve ourselves in a way. Who knows? Man may have a better chance when he starts again." ONLY ABOUT ONE BILLION HUMANS WILL SURVIVE What does he mean by starting again? "By the end of this century, there is a high probability that the bulk of our species on the planet will be eliminated," the soft-spoken Lovelock gravely remarked. "There may be something, plus or minus, on the order of a billion left." Is there much hope, we asked. "I don't see our current civilization hacking it," he lamented in his response. But, but, what if? "Enormous changes must be made," he stressed. "Society is much too slow in cutting back." He insisted these changes should have started at least 50 years ago. Later he added, as an afterthought, "If Europe and USA were trying to be good and cut back by 30 percent, it's really not going to help much. I don't think the public wants to do it." In Lovelock's forecast, he envisions, at the end of this century, the last few humans would be forced to rebuild the remnants of our civilization in the Arctic. It won't be as cold up there by then, as you might think. He told us, "Within 25 years, most of the global ice in the Arctic will be gone. You will be able to take a sailboat to the North Pole." How long before we begin to feel these changes? "In my own modeling, I rather think it is an unknown number of years," Lovelock explained. "It may be five years or it may be 30 years." He offered a visual, "Think of it as a rope or a string. Global warming may run up in a straight line or a curve lying a bit loose as the IPCC seems to project." Lovelock summarized why his forecast is dire and probably irreversible, "Everybody forgets the greatest damage we've done to the earth is not so much the emissions from greenhouse gases, but taking away the natural resistance from the farmland ecosystem. By doing that, we have disabled the planet's ability to regulate itself." Lovelock does not enjoy painting a picture of what earth might look like several decades from now. He wrote in the Independent, in January, "Much of the tropical land mass will become scrub and desert, and will no longer serve for regulation; this adds to the 40 per cent of the Earth's surface we have depleted to feed ourselves." Through his book and in various articles, Lovelock has repeatedly blasted environmentalists who gamble away earth's future by campaigning for renewable energy sources. That's when we began talking about environmentalists, especially the idealists who claim to be helping preserve the earth. So, we asked this leading environmental scientist what was really wrong with today's environmental movement. Bitterness entered his voice when Lovelock answered, "It's mostly made up of urban people, who know almost nothing about the countryside and still less about the ecosystem." He scoffed, "Their solutions are basically urban-political solutions. They continue to insist on wanting to run their cars on bio fuels. This is one of the maddest ideas of the lot." Lovelock cuts no slack for those championing the cause of bio fuels. He writes in The Revenge of Gaia, "It would require us to burn every year about two to three gigatons of carbon as bio fuel (a gigatons is one thousand million tons). Compare this quantity with our yearly food consumption of half a gigaton tons... We would need the land area of several Earths just to grow fuel." Does he believe environmentalists are wrecking the environment? "I'm afraid I do," he glumly responded. Because we know there remain several environmental groups who refuse to embrace nuclear energy as a much-needed solution to the planet's energy mix, we asked what he would like to say about them. "They are being very foolish," he quickly shot back. After a pause, he added, "They are living in a dream world." Like the father figure he is, Lovelock is disappointed but tries to remain buoyant. He wrote in his recent book, "My feelings about modern environmentalism are more parallel with those that might pass through the mind of a head-mistress of an inner-city school or the colonel of a newly formed regiment of licentious, and naturally disobedient young men: how the hell can these unruly charges be disciplined and made effective?" LOVELOCK WANTS THE WORLD TO GO NUCLEAR NOW The headline of a recent editorial in a Boston newspaper asked, "Are Pro Nuclear People the New Greens?" We discussed that. "It's a bit of an old term, really," he grinned. "Nuclear has been around for more than 40 years at least. I suppose in some countries, like the United Kingdom, you will find some groups are looking more toward nuclear." Make no mistake in thinking James Lovelock is anything but Pro Nuclear. His quote adorns the top of the front page of the World Nuclear Association's website, "There is no sensible alternative to nuclear power if we are to sustain civilization." Rightly so, the trade association refers to their proponent as the "preeminent world leader in the development of environmental consciousness." In his book, Lovelock writes, "There is no alternative but nuclear fission until fusion energy and sensible forms of renewable energy arrive as a truly long-term provider. Nuclear energy is free of emissions and independent of imports from what will be a disturbed world." Lovelock briefly analyzes the value and harm of each energy source in The Revenge of Gaia. He has a burning disgust for coal mining, and finds carbon-based fuels inefficient and dangerous, not only to humans but also to earth as a self-regulating system. He has frequently warned that renewables are insufficient to meet our planetary energy needs. In contrast to renewable advocates Amory Lovins or Senator Hillary Clinton, Lovelock sees little value in the immediate future for either solar or wind energy programs, and has harsh words for them, writing, "It will fail and bring discredit both to the greens and to the politicians foolish enough to adopt renewables as a major source of energy before they have been properly developed." He believes their renewable energy solutions might only hasten our civilization's demise.
Rate this Article:
Current: 4.5 / 5 stars - 2 vote(s).
Article Tags: Wind, Solar, Environment, Global Warming, Coal, Climate Change, Uranium, Nuclear Energy, Renewables Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/environment-articles/world-population-to-crash-by-80-percent-says-top-uk-scientist-part-one-32225.html About the Author:
James Finch contributes to StockInterview.com and other publications. Sign up for your free subscription to articles by James Finch by visiting http://www.stockinterview.com Write to James Finch at jfinch@stockinterview.com
Related ArticlesHome Insulation – Slash your Energy Bills, Stay Snug in Winter (and Cool in Summer) How to Make Big Cuts in the Energy you Use in your Home, and your Energy Bills Should I Put a Windmill on My House to Save the Planet? How a New Boiler Can Save you More Than a Third Off your Heating Bill, and What to Look Out for How to Save Big Money on Fridges, Dishwashers, Washing Machines, Tumble Dryers How to Choose the Right Green Electricity Tariff in the UK How to Heat your Home Using the Earth’s Natural Heat (and a Little Electricity) How to Get your Hot Water Straight From the Sun Got a Question? Ask.Ask the community a question about this article:Frequently Asked Questions Fire in compost site How many garbage cans fit in a garbage truck? Wind and ocean currents are examples of ? Could HAARP Cause Global Warming? What can i do to insure there is a world for my ... Gore's Opposition Funded by Scottish Fuel Q&A Powered by:
 Latest Environment Articles"enviromentally Friendly" or "eco" Glass Filter Media Should be Recycled From UK Glass- Durafilter is 100% British Nature Reaches to Frustration Level Earth Day Inspires Global Change No More Oil? Making Money With Renewable Energy Are Wood Stoves Good for the Environment? An Introduction To The Concept Of Sustainable Industrial Cleaning Vastu Shastra V/s Feng Shui More from James FinchInvestment Manager Warns About Investing In Uranium Projects Whose Uranium Will Be Used at the Proposed New Mexico Enrichment Facility? New Mexico Town to Embrace Incoming Uranium Miners Cameco's Uranium For New Mexico's New Enrichment Facility? New Mexico Uranium Mining: Who Are The Serious Players? A Company's Story Must Carry Impingement Value to Obtain Widespread Publicity The Key to New Mexico's Uranium is a State of the Art Mill A Nuclear Power Plant May Be Next for New Mexico |
|
|||||
|
Article Categories
|
|||||||
 Sign up for our email newsletterReceive updates, enter your email below
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.20, 17) |
|||||||
