 |
How the New Sec Regs Affect Compensation Committees
Author: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD  | Posted: 07-03-2007 | Comments: 0 | Views: 15 | Rating: (51)  (?) 
 An interesting aspect of the proposed new Security & Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations on Executive Compensation relate to the need to supply justification for their decisions (see February 2006 issue for details of the proposed regulation). Currently, most Boards provide a written section, which discusses their general philosophy, such as “providing a total compensation package for executives that is competitive with a group of comparable companies”. In recent public filings, the narrative has even spelled out relative to the measures that will be used in evaluating the level of performance achieved, in order to show that the Compensation Committee has imposed realistic performance metrics as the justification for granting incentives and equity based awards.
In the past, the specific numerical targets have not been provided, even though the performance measures have been identified, the rationale being that this would offer confidential, strategic business information to competitors. Some have argued, however, that by not stating the exact performance requirements up front, the Committee has left some “wiggle room” that will allow them to modify the requirements later to levels below the original expectations, and thereby granting awards when they are not truly deserved. Until the SEC issues its final regulations, it will be interesting to see how the Compensation Committees handle this issue, which in effect requires them to provide sufficient information to shareholders without disclosing confidential business information.
It is interesting to note, though, that the SEC regulations only cover a small percentage of employers that exist in the United States. While SEC and other Federal regulations cover publicly-traded firms, and IRS regulations (Section 4958) cover not-for-profit organizations, the overwhelming majority of firms -- privately-held companies -- are not subject to such intense scrutiny. Currently, the only instances where executive compensation in a privately-held firm is subject to examination are when excessive compensation triggers tax liabilities or minority shareholder actions. Otherwise, privately-held firms fly under the radar screen with regard to executive compensation. Lately, however, many privately-held companies recognize that they cannot stay hidden for much longer, and are embracing the concepts that the regulators have imposed relative to proper governance, reasonable pay, and arms-length dealings.
What, then, will be the new role of the Compensation Committee in the dawn of the proposed SEC rules? As the emphasis on the Compensation Committee has intensified as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, the proposed SEC rules, and similar regulations, Committees are being reconstituted, and are reevaluating their role within the public companies they serve. Generally speaking, the overall role of the Compensation Committee is to serve in an advisory role to the Board of Directors, both in strategic and administrative capacities.
· Strategically, the Committee will consider how the achievement of the overall goals and objectives of the Company can be supported by adopting specific compensation plans that will drive the intended performance.
· Administratively, the Committee will authorize the undertaking of the required competitive studies to ensure that the Company’s executive compensation programs (covering base salary programs, short- and longer-term incentives, as well as supplemental benefits and perquisites) are competitive within the market.
In its role, the Compensation Committee recommends executive compensation programs for Board approval, and makes recommendations to the Board relative to the executive compensation programs for the company’s top executives. The intent of the executive compensation programs is driven by the company’s compensation philosophy, established in conjunction with top management, which represents the organization’s position on executive pay relative to an appropriate peer group. It is the Committee’s responsibility to ensure that the compensation philosophy properly addresses the company’s business goals and objectives, and that the compensation programs are consistent with this philosophy, so that the appropriate financial motivation is present to focus each executive’s attention on goal achievement.
With the advent of Sarbanes-Oxley, Boards and Compensation Committees are being more diligent in their search for qualified members to serve. These new members bring a level of credibility and comfort to the process, as many possess special knowledge and expertise to assist in making appropriate decisions for the benefit of the organization. The abilities of Board and Committee members are complemented by the use of independent advisors and consultants (attorneys, accountants, compensation professionals), engaging them directly to provide objective counsel on matters dealing with compensation.
Most notably, the new roles of the Compensation Committee will be to:
1. Provide the necessary transparency required by the regulations through proper disclosures within the Company’s SEC filings.
2. Recommend for Board approval the specific performance criteria and annual and longer-term performance targets for awards under the executive compensation program that will drive desired business objectives and shareholder value.
3. Review the performance of the Top 5 officers, relative to the achievement of performance objectives for use in calculating award levels under the executive compensation program. The Committee is not involved in the evaluation of performance of any other individuals within the company.
4. Provide periodic oversight on all short- and long-term incentive plans, perquisites, and other benefits covering the company’s executives, to ensure that the programs are meeting the intended performance goals of the organization.
5. Insure that all Committee business is conducted in a moral and ethical fashion, maintaining the highest levels of personal conduct and professional standards, and taking action to notify the Board of any issues, as well as the necessary corrective action, that may impact the Committee’s ability to objectively fulfill its duties and responsibilities.
The role of the Compensation Committee becomes more challenging each year; however, the functions of the Committee will only serve to benefit, in the long-term, both executives and shareholders, where executives benefit with awards correlated to their level of performance, and where shareholders see adequate returns on their investments through increases in the value of the company stock.
Rate this Article:
Current: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s).
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/human-resources-articles/how-the-new-sec-regs-affect-compensation-committees-114057.html
About the Author:Paul R. Dorf is the Managing Director of Compensation Resources, Inc. He is responsible for directing consulting services in all areas of executive compensation, short and long-term incentives, sales compensation, performance management systems, and pay-for-performance salary administration. He has over 40 years of Human Resource and Compensation experience and has held various executive positions with a number of large corporate organizations. He also has over 20 years of direct consulting experience as head of the Executive Compensation Consulting Practices for major accounting and actuarial/benefit consulting firms, including KPMG, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (formerly Touche Ross), and Kwasha Lipton.
|
Submitting articles has become one of the most popular means of generating quality backlinks and targeted traffic to your website. Join us today - It's Free! |
|
Related Articles
Foreseeing the Impact of Proposed Sec Disclosure Rules
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 06/03/2007 | Human Resources
Upper Saddle River, NJ - January 26, 2006 - If you have not already read about the proposed regulations developed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for reporting executive compensation in public filings, you undoubtedly will in the near future. As we have seen so many times in the past, media attention and public outcry about excesses in executive compensation usually brings governmental reaction in the form of new and more stringent legislation and reporting requirements.
New Year’s Resolutions - Executive Compensation Style
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 20/02/2007 | Human Resources
Upper Saddle River, NJ - January 4, 2006 - We all succumb to the annual ritual of making a bunch of resolutions about how we will change our lives with the start of the New Year: eat better and healthier foods, exercise more, reorganize our rather hectic and stressful lives in order to live longer, and learn to enjoy what we have.
Compensation Resources, Inc. Opens New England Regional Office in Fairfield County, Ct
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 06/03/2007 | Human Resources
Upper Saddle River, NJ - March 5, 2007 - Compensation Resources, Inc., one of the nation’s premier Compensation and Human Resources consulting practices, is pleased to announce the opening of its New England regional office in Connecticut. Harry J. Schum, one of the firm's Senior Consultants, will be heading up this office
Sec Set to Vote on Sweeping Executive Compensation Reporting Reforms
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 06/03/2007 | Human Resources
Upper Saddle River, NJ - January 12th, 2006 - According to the AFL-CIO, CEO pay has grown from 85 times that of the average worker to over 430 times that of the average worker in 1990 and 2004 respectively. This, coupled with increasing shareholder awareness and media scrutiny, has put the Securities and Exchange Commission in a position to respond by forcing companies to clearly communicate the levels of their top executives' salary, bonuses, equity, perquisites, retirement benefits and other compensation.
Latest Reaction to Backdating Stock Options
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 06/03/2007 | Human Resources
Upper Saddle River, N.J. - September 12, 2006 - The government’s investigation into the excesses of executive compensation has now expanded into the practice of granting backdated stock options, with at least 100 companies now under the microscope
Are you Prepared for Change?
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 07/03/2007 | Human Resources
The annual review and analysis of corporate filings for public companies in full swing. Almost invariably, this scrutiny brings with it an outcry concerning the exorbitant levels of executive compensation and the lack of a direct relationship between what some executives made and the financial performance of their companies.
The Corporate Income Tax - Investor Enemy Number Two
By: Steve Selengut | 18/01/2008 | Taxes
Politicians have never been shy about dictating proper behavior to individuals or hesitant in shamelessly picking the pockets of businesses to fund their projects--- but just as Congress picks corporate pockets, corporations pick those of their shareholders.
Scrutinizing Nfp Executive Compensation
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 22/01/2008 | Human Resources
Last Spring, the Exempt Organizations Office of the IRS’ Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division released a report covering the results of its latest examination of Executive Compensation issues within the Not-For-Profit (NFP) sector. The results, covering an examination of Form 990s from over 1,200 organizations, found some significant issues requiring action or additional scrutiny. The significance of this study highlights the need for NFP Boards to closely examine compensation...
Got a Question? Ask.
Ask the community a question about this article:
Frequently Asked Questions
What's a fair commission rate to pay a VP of Sales ...
By: Troublemaker | 12-09-2007
What's a fair commission rate to pay a VP of Sales?Here's the scenario: A VP of Sales and Marketing for an early stage company will be doing some direct selling during his first year with the company in addition to other strategic duties. Other factors are base salary: $75 - $90K; Sales cycle 3 - 6 mos; Deal size: $100 - $200K. What's a fair commission rate?
Q&A Powered by: 
Latest Human Resources Articles
Locating Lost Benefit Plan Participants
By: Cathy Taylor | 20/08/2008
Discover what the legal requirements are for benefit plan administrators in locating lost plan participants
The Usefulness of Reverse White Pages!
By: michel david | 20/08/2008
The search service that helps you find the details of a caller by using the caller’s phone number is call reverse white lookup service. This service not only offers the reverse phone number search option but also provides the reverse address search, which makes it possible to find out who lives at a particular address.
Obtaining Important Information Through People Search
By: John Walter Adams | 19/08/2008
People search sites aren’t exclusively thee to function as a search tool for missing persons. Actually, these online resources can also be used so you can get information about any person that may be significant for you.
Advantages of Using People Directory Databases
By: Francisella Griffin | 18/08/2008
Many years ago, getting access to information about people you may have lost in touch with could be a daunting and expensive task. Having the need to travel different locations to visit public and private establishments doesn’t necessarily mean that that does it. In fact, that could only be the beginning of you search. After going there, you may need to spend hours and wait to get the relevant information you have asked for.
Easy Access to People Search Information
By: John Walter Adams | 17/08/2008
Some may regard people search as a time consuming and expensive activity but there really are ways to do it without much stress and much expenses. Especially, if you will take advantage of available resources online, it would be possible for you to get the names, current address, and contact information of people you actually need to search.
Unknown Phone Number is a Problem No More Through Phone Number Lookup
By: Ashley Beyle | 16/08/2008
Various reasons come with various ways to search for someone using a certain number is very common. It is really a disturbance on your part if a certain caller repeatedly calls you up and said nothing on the next line. At first, you just get to wonder who your caller is. But if it happens again and again, then it is a threat on your part being a victim of foolishness. What if you receive harassment through telephone? Well, now you can have your part to stop that. Be aware that you can know who
To Fight or not to Fight, a Peo Perspective on Unemployment Claim Challenges
By: John Rico | 16/08/2008
Many business owners and managers have found themselves in a quandary over whether or not to fight an unemployment claim. Who is eligible? Who pays for a claim? How does this affect my business in the long run? Since it’s your taxes that pay for unemployment benefits, it’s in your best interest to become familiar with the how this program works. Here are some facts about unemployment that might just help to make the decision whether or not to fight a claim a little easier.
Useful White Pages Available Online
By: John Walter Adams | 14/08/2008
There are times when we suddenly miss our old close friends in high school. There are also times when something reminds us of the happy times with our close friends but we are unaware of their whereabouts. We become emotionally nostalgic and we suddenly felt the need of seeing each other again. Reunions can be a great idea for friends to see each other again after many years past and reminiscing the old days.
More from Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD
Preparing for Disclosures Under New Form 990 - are You Ready?
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 24/07/2008 | Human Resources
Many not-for-profit organizations will be utilizing the new Form 990 for filing tax information this year. The recent issuance of these "final" regulations on financial reporting for tax-exempt organizations is a long-awaited reaction to misfilings that have occurred over the years, whether intentional or not. Reporting under the new Form 990 is an outcome to actions caused by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Securities and Exchange Commission relative to good governance and disclosure of execut
Tax-exempt Organizations to Use Revised Form 990 Beginning in 2008
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 15/05/2008 | Non Profit Organizations
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued a revised version of the Form 990 to be used by tax-exempt organizations. Based on public feedback, a final version has been implemented for reporting years starting in 2008. Several key changes address executive compensation, the organization’s conflict of interest policy, payment to independent contractors, and the definition of related organizations. Furthermore, the revised Form 990 will be phased in over the next (3) Years
Compensation Resources, Inc. Releases Its 2008 Severance Survey
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 02/04/2008 | Human Resources
Upper Saddle River, N.J. – April 1, 2008 - Compensation Resources, Inc.(CRI) has released the results of its 2008 Severance Survey. The purpose of this study was to obtain current data on the prevalence of various practices affecting severance policies among employers that represent all sizes, locations, and industries. Data was compiled from survey questions that were developed by CRI and distributed to companies in over 18 industries, in addition to Non-Profit organizations.
409a Compliance on Written Plan
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 21/02/2008 | Human Resources
The Internal Revenue Service recently issued Notice 2007-78 that provides plan sponsors an extension to December 31, 2008 to maintain compliance with written documentation relative to deferred compensation plans. Written language of a deferred compensation plan must be in compliance with the regulation as of the end of this year. Plans, therefore, have extra time to be modified to comply in the written form, but must continue to be in compliance operationally with Section 409A
Scrutinizing Nfp Executive Compensation
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 22/01/2008 | Human Resources
Last Spring, the Exempt Organizations Office of the IRS’ Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division released a report covering the results of its latest examination of Executive Compensation issues within the Not-For-Profit (NFP) sector. The results, covering an examination of Form 990s from over 1,200 organizations, found some significant issues requiring action or additional scrutiny. The significance of this study highlights the need for NFP Boards to closely examine compensation...
Sales Compensation and the Law
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 22/01/2008 | Human Resources
The New York Department of Labor recently passed an amendment to the Labor Law relative to sales personnel. Effective October 16, 2007, employers are required to provide written terms of employment for commissioned salespeople or risk adverse impact of decisions rendered in any wage action brought against the employer. In the absence of a written document setting forth the terms of employment of commissioned salespeople, the Department of Labor will rule in favor of the terms alleged by the...
Compensation Resources, Inc. Releases Its 2007 Year-end Compensation Survey
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 22/01/2008 | Human Resources
Compensation Resources, Inc. (CRI) has released the results of its 2007 Year-End Compensation Survey. The purpose of this study was to obtain compensation data to be used for trending and planning purposes at companies of all sizes and shapes. Data was compiled from survey questions that were developed by CRI and distributed to companies in 12 industrial classifications, in addition to Not-for-Profit organizations.
Lessons Learned From Clifton Savings Bank
By: Paul R. Dorf, Ph.D., APD | 22/01/2008 | Human Resources
Recently, Clifton Savings Bank in New Jersey was in the news regarding shareholder issues relative to executive and board compensation. Battling with dissident shareholders for three (3) years, excessive pay claims were dismissed by the court.
|
|
Business 
