Enrico Schaefer is the founding attorney of Traverse Legal, PLC, a law firm specializing in web law. You can find out more about protecting your domain name, UDRP arbitrations and anti-cybersquatting laws at Traverse Legal’s domain name theft and trademark infringement domain dispute blog.
The golden rule for a trial attorney is “know your judge.” This maxim also applies to domain name disputes where the UDRP Panel plays the role of the judge.
With this maxim in mind, parties involved in domain name dispute resolution should be aware of how the panels work, how you have the right to select how many panelists handle your case, and how you can ultimately affect which particular panelist is selected - so as to best know their "judge(s)".
The most common misunderstanding with those unfamiliar with the UDRP is how selecting a three person panel, as opposed to a single panelist, may affect the outcome of the decision. This is because of the rules that regulate the three-member panel, which afford each party the right to select one panelist with the third being selected by the provider from a list approved by both parties.
Regardless of your decision to choose a one or three-member panel, it is important to be able to recognize which prior decisions are favorable to your particular facts and circumstances and then identify the panelist(s) that delivered those decisions.
Conversely, it is as important, if not even more critical, to be able to know which panelists you should attempt to shield. These would be panelists that share opposing views, made known in their dealings with prior domain disputes. Further, it is important to note that should you decide to select three panelists and pay the additional fee, you can change your mind and select one panelist and get a refund if done in a timely and proper way. While both WIPO and NAF provide a list of panelists, the key is being able to understand where those panelists stand on particular issues that arise within a domain dispute; an issue that may control whether or not your goals are achieved.
See the list of panelists at both WIPO and NAF below:
WIPO’s list of panelists. http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/panel.html#1
NAF’s list of panelists. http://domains.adrforum.com/panel.aspx
Ultimately, law firms experienced in the UDRP are more educated and better-equipped to select a list of panelists that will best serve your purpose given the unique set of facts. In addition, firms experienced in the UDRP and domain name disputes can also advise you as to the amount of risk, which may affect choosing a three person panel over a single panelist, given your particular situation.
So just as trial attorneys must know the background on the judges that they come before, you as the client need to know the background on the attorneys that you approach when you find yourself facing a domain dispute - because not doing so can have a real affect on the outcome of your case.
- Related Articles
- Related Q&A
- Cybersquatting Arbitration: Restoring Domain Name Urls
- Preventing Domain Name Theft: Beyond the Udrp
- Combating Cyber-Squatting And Other Domain Name Maladies: An Overview Of UDRP Proceedings
- Udrp Panels: What you Should Know
- Domain Name Dispute Resolution: Choosing your Forum
- Pornosquatting: a Domain Name Theft Nightmare
- Your Domain Name Trademarks Questions Answered
- Profit From Expired Domain Name Registrations




Temporary Staffing: Remedy to Growing Staffing Challenges in the LPO Industry
By: Cooper | 30/06/2009LPO (Legal Process Outsourcing) industry is growing exponentially and India continues to be the hottest destination for Law Firms, Corporations, and other businesses from US, UK, and other European countries.
Kerala IPR Academy on the anvil: Law Department
By: R.S. Praveen Raj | 28/06/2009In his address to the Legislative Assembly on 2oth February 2008, the Governor of Kerala had announced that an Intellectual Property Rights Academy would be constituted in the State. Of late, it is learnt that the proposal for the constitution of the IPR Academy is under deliberations at vide file no. 20311/nodal(1)/08/Law
Get ready to eat Patented Biryani; It’s ‘Incredible India’
By: R.S. Praveen Raj | 23/06/2009Be prepared to hold your excitement next time you walk in to your favourite restaurant to order a "Hyderabadi Biryani". It's quite likely that the waiter may ask you a question "Sir/Madam, Would you like to have the patented biryani or generic biryani". Hopefully, you may not get stunned as you are familiar with "patented drugs" and “generic drugs”. It is learnt that some Biryani Maker Association from Hyderabad is about to apply for GI registration of "Hyderabadi Biriyani"
Finding and Choosing a Patent Lawyer
By: David Done | 17/06/2009Finding and Choosing a Patent Lawyer - Depending on what area you live in, you might find that there are many different patent lawyers from which you could choose. Learn more tips for finding a patent lawyer at Aplegal.com
What separates the Baby KPO from its Mother, Mrs. BPO
By: Cooper | 15/06/2009The genie of BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) has evolved and given birth to a child named KPO (Knowledge Process Outsourcing). But, is the child a mirror image of its mother or has it come with the some differences remains a subject of hot argument.
LPO Express may face a Halt due to Lack of Talent Supply
By: Cooper | 06/06/2009The LPO industry is still very nascent, but it has already seen a tremendous growth in a short period of time. According to the experts, the LPO industry is expected to experience exponential growth in the coming years.
Piracy – The Bane Of The Digital Age
By: Alex Stanley | 25/05/2009Piracy is a phenomenon that affects all of us. No self-respecting individual would ever consider engaging in shop-lifting or petty theft, and yet all us do not even bat an eyelid before buying or downloading a copyrighted product in an illegal manner. All of us need to come together and realise the gravity of this situation before we can move towards fixing this heinous problem once and for all.
The Acpa: Trademark Violations in Domains
By: Enrico Schaefer | 17/05/2007 | Intellectual PropertyDefendants are often confused by lawsuits that come from trademark holders who are seeking to have domains that correspond to their trademarks transferred to themselves. This confusion arises from the fact that registrars do little to nothing to validate the legal right of a registrant to a domain during registration. On the other side, the ACPA protects the rights of many trademark holders when it comes to the use of that trademark in top-level domains.
Domain Name Dispute Resolution: Choosing your Forum
By: Enrico Schaefer | 15/05/2007 | Internet LawWhereas a civil or ciminal case must be arbitrated in a specified court, domain name dispute cases are resolved through service providers such as WIPO and NAF, providers which serve the same purpose but should not be selected at random.
Udrp Panels: What you Should Know
By: Enrico Schaefer | 10/05/2007 | Intellectual PropertyJust as a trial attorney never enters a courtroom without researching his judge, those who arbitrate before a UDRP Panel need to be aware of the views of the panelists, and the rights granted in the UDRP that can be used to shield hostile panelists.
Pornosquatting: a Domain Name Theft Nightmare
By: Enrico Schaefer | 07/05/2007 | Domain NamesWhen facing a stolen domain name, or having intended visitors sent over to sites filled with obscene material rather than your own, it is often the most important time to get legal advice and fight to have your trademark restored.
Non-compete Contracts as a Tool for Protecting Competitive Edge
By: Enrico Schaefer | 03/05/2007 | National, State, LocalTodays economy is filled with industries who face unprecedented competition as they struggle to gain an edge upon their competitors. As never before, non-compete and non-solicitation agreements are becoming effective avenues through which businesses can protect investments and information that help them in the competitive market.
Non-compete Contracts: the Employer Perspective
By: Enrico Schaefer | 02/05/2007 | Strategic PlanningNon-compete and non-solicitation contracts, along with the legal basis upon which they rest, are complex issues that face both employees and their employers and should be totally understood in order to ensure the rights of both parties are protected in the case of a dispute.
The Michigan Sales Represetatives Commission Act: Protecting yourself
By: Enrico Schaefer | 30/04/2007 | National, State, LocalWith the Michigan Supreme Court yet to make a decision following the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals one, the specifics of the enforcement of the SRCA has grown more unclear. However, there are things that a producer can do before they face the severe penalties for what the SRCA deems "improper" withholding of sales representative commissions.