Jonathan Cooper is an attorney in private practice in New York. He has represented small businesses and individuals with respect to insurance-related claims for over 10 years. To order a copy of his book "Why Most Accident Victims Do Not Recover the Full Value of their Claim," please contact his office at (516) 791-5700, or order the book through his website at http://www.TheNewYorkAccidentBook.com or at http://www.jmcooperlaw.com
Copyright (c) 2008 Law Offices of Jonathan Cooper
In our prior article entitled "5 Rules to Succeed in Filing an Insurance Claim," we provided tips to avoid some of the insurance industry's favorite gambits for denying rightful claims, including the insurer's receiving late notice of the claim. But let's say you made a mistake, and failed to timely notify your insurer about the claim. Should you meekly accept defeat, and walk away with your tail held squarely between your legs? Assuming that the claim is of significant value, the answer to this question should be a resounding "NO -- NOT WITHOUT A FIGHT!"
Although you could theoretically appeal the insurer's denial of claim to your State's Insurance Department, I have found this step to be a waste of time, money and effort. Your resources will be far better spent in court. That being said, your likelihood of success in contesting the insurer's denial of coverage in court will be largely dependent on the particular facts of your case, and naturally, some of these defenses are more difficult to prove than others. To help you make a more intelligent assessment of your chances, following is a list of possible challenges to the denial:
1) No prejudice, no denial - At the end of July, New York State Governor David Paterson signed into law new legislation that will bar insurers from disclaiming coverage for late claims unless they can demonstrate they were "materially prejudiced" by the delay. (Until the new law takes effect in mid-January, 2009, the rule remains that an insurer may deny claims on the grounds of late notice regardless of whether or not the insurer suffered harm by the delay.)
2) Lack of Knowledge of Injury - One justification for providing late notice of the claim is that was no reasonable basis to conclude that anyone was injured in the accident. Bear in mind that this is not an easy burden of proof to satisfy, because the courts have held that in an accident where the property damage totaled just over $700, the insured was obligated to notify his insurer about the potential for a personal injury claim.
3) Lack of Knowledge of Accident - although somewhat self-evident, if you had no reason to know that an accident occurred, you are not obligated to report it to your insurance carrier. Stated differently, you can't report what you don't know.
4) "They Would Never Sue Me -- Would They?" - New York's highest court has held that where it does not appear that any permanent injury has been sustained, and the nature of the relationship between the injured party and the insured (such as a close familial relationship) was such that the insured had reasonably believed that they would have been apprised if the injured party had been contemplating a lawsuit, late notice of the claim may be excused.
5) Lack of Knowledge of Coverage - New York's courts have found justifiable an insured's late notice of claim where the delay was caused by the insurance broker's faulty advice that the policy had been cancelled. Similarly, the courts have deemed reasonable an insured's untimely notice where the insured belatedly discovered that the defects in the workmanship of its products were caused by industrial sabotage, and there was substantial confusion as to which insurance policy was implicated.
6) Incapacity of the Insured - Finally, although infancy or illness do not, standing alone, toll the time within which the insured must provide notice of the claim, the courts have excused the timely notice requirement where the insured, a person of "limited personal and vocational backgrounds," was misinformed by the agent of the insurer that coverage was provided under a policy issued by another company. Likewise, the courts exempted an insured from the timely notice requirement where her physical condition rendered her completely dependent on others, and she had relied upon what the driver, her nephew, told her about the accident.
In sum, your insurer's denial of coverage for your late notice of claim need not be the final word on the matter. Under the right conditions, you retain the power to contest the denial - and win.
In our prior article entitled "5 Rules to Succeed in Filing an Insurance Claim," we provided tips to avoid some of the insurance industry's favorite gambits for denying rightful claims, including the insurer's receiving late notice of the claim. But let's say you made a mistake, and failed to timely notify your insurer about the claim. Should you meekly accept defeat, and walk away with your tail held squarely between your legs? Assuming that the claim is of significant value, the answer to this question should be a resounding "NO -- NOT WITHOUT A FIGHT!"
Although you could theoretically appeal the insurer's denial of claim to your State's Insurance Department, I have found this step to be a waste of time, money and effort. Your resources will be far better spent in court. That being said, your likelihood of success in contesting the insurer's denial of coverage in court will be largely dependent on the particular facts of your case, and naturally, some of these defenses are more difficult to prove than others. To help you make a more intelligent assessment of your chances, following is a list of possible challenges to the denial:
1) No prejudice, no denial - At the end of July, New York State Governor David Paterson signed into law new legislation that will bar insurers from disclaiming coverage for late claims unless they can demonstrate they were "materially prejudiced" by the delay. (Until the new law takes effect in mid-January, 2009, the rule remains that an insurer may deny claims on the grounds of late notice regardless of whether or not the insurer suffered harm by the delay.)
2) Lack of Knowledge of Injury - One justification for providing late notice of the claim is that was no reasonable basis to conclude that anyone was injured in the accident. Bear in mind that this is not an easy burden of proof to satisfy, because the courts have held that in an accident where the property damage totaled just over $700, the insured was obligated to notify his insurer about the potential for a personal injury claim.
3) Lack of Knowledge of Accident - although somewhat self-evident, if you had no reason to know that an accident occurred, you are not obligated to report it to your insurance carrier. Stated differently, you can't report what you don't know.
4) "They Would Never Sue Me -- Would They?" - New York's highest court has held that where it does not appear that any permanent injury has been sustained, and the nature of the relationship between the injured party and the insured (such as a close familial relationship) was such that the insured had reasonably believed that they would have been apprised if the injured party had been contemplating a lawsuit, late notice of the claim may be excused.
5) Lack of Knowledge of Coverage - New York's courts have found justifiable an insured's late notice of claim where the delay was caused by the insurance broker's faulty advice that the policy had been cancelled. Similarly, the courts have deemed reasonable an insured's untimely notice where the insured belatedly discovered that the defects in the workmanship of its products were caused by industrial sabotage, and there was substantial confusion as to which insurance policy was implicated.
6) Incapacity of the Insured - Finally, although infancy or illness do not, standing alone, toll the time within which the insured must provide notice of the claim, the courts have excused the timely notice requirement where the insured, a person of "limited personal and vocational backgrounds," was misinformed by the agent of the insurer that coverage was provided under a policy issued by another company. Likewise, the courts exempted an insured from the timely notice requirement where her physical condition rendered her completely dependent on others, and she had relied upon what the driver, her nephew, told her about the accident.
In sum, your insurer's denial of coverage for your late notice of claim need not be the final word on the matter. Under the right conditions, you retain the power to contest the denial - and win.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A
- Day Insurance – Quick Car Insurance!
- Rental Car Insurance - Need Car Insurance for Your Rental Car?
- Cheap Car Insurance - Florida Car Insurance Policies
- Protect Your Family with Car Insurance
- Car Insurance: Feel Safe While Driving
- Get the Cheapest Car Insurance
- Road Traffic Accident Claims
- Personal Injury Accident Claim Company




FDA Panel Finds Increased Risk with Some MRI drugs
By: Katie Kelley | 24/12/2009A recent FDA panel has found certain MRI imaging drugs have an increased chance of causing the potentially fatal skin disease Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis.
Immigration to Canada Process is Fast and Safe
By: Jacob William | 24/12/2009Like other countries, immigration to Canada is safe and easy. Right from immigration lawyers to government bodies, one can get help from many ways while filing their application. Read on to know more about it......
The Dangers of Online Will Writing
By: Tim Bishop | 24/12/2009Many people put off making a will, and if they do get around to it, use cheap, online will writers who might have no qualifications or training. By doing so they are putting their assets in danger, and risk causing undue stress to their loved ones. Read on to find out why you should make sure your will is properly drafted.
Brain Injury Prevention and Treatment to Help Students, Pro Athletes
By: Katie Kelley | 24/12/2009Recent high-profile traumatic brain injuries have called for legislation monitoring concussion policies in professional and high school sports. New medical breakthroughs may help patients currently suffering from a traumatic brain injury.
K1 Visa Thailand: Adjustment of Status of Thai Fiancee
By: Dennis P. Ramm | 24/12/2009If the Thai fiancee is present in the United States on a K1 fiancée visa, she must marry her US fiancé before the lapse of ninety days from admission in the country. Otherwise, she may be subject to deportation or removal. After the marriage, in order to extend her stay, her present status must be adjusted to permanent resident within the prescriptive period.
Communication and Family Law
By: Mark B. Baer | 23/12/2009Good communication is vital to successful legal proceedings. The best way I can serve my clients is to help them to make as many of the important decisions in the dissolution of their relationship outside of the court system. This demands clear, accurate communication between the parties to a divorce, as well as between their respective attorneys.
What Happens When You Contact A Whiplash Solicitor?
By: Nick Jervis | 23/12/2009If you have been involved in a car accident and suffered a whiplash injury, what is going to happen when you first make contact with a solicitor?
A Growing Problem Mortgage Fraud
By: Adrianna Noton | 23/12/2009Mortgage fraud is a growing problem throughout the United States. You want you the equity in your home to be more than the loan on your property. With the boom in the housing market there are those who will try to take advantage of this situation and try to get...
To Sue or not to Sue - That is the Question
By: Jonathan Cooper | 16/12/2008 | BusinessThis article discusses how even when you have your small business lawyer not only draft appropriate sales forms and agreements, but also improve your procedures about confirming customers' orders before filling them (both of which are extremely important) to assure that they will stand up in court, there are still some circumstances that you should think twice before suing your non-paying customer.
Can You Afford (not) to Sue ?
By: Jonathan Cooper | 08/12/2008 | BusinessThis article outlines the 3 questions you should - or must - have answered before you decide to begin litigation.
Commission Agreements: 4 Myths That Can Needlessly Expose Your Small Business to Legal Claims
By: Jonathan Cooper | 20/08/2008 | BusinessThis article exposes the myths associated with sales commission agreements, and explains how oral agreements or poorly drafted agreements can leave a company needlessly vulnerable to breach of contract claims
6 Ways to Challenge an Insurer's Denial of Your (late) Notice of Claim
By: Jonathan Cooper | 13/08/2008 | LawThis article provides some tips on what to do if the insurance company denies your claim
The Dangers of E-mail and Other Traps to Avoid When Consummating a Business Deal
By: Jonathan Cooper | 01/08/2008 | BusinessThis article highlights the dangers of e-mail in the small business context, and provides practical suggestions to minimize the risks to a core business when negotiating a deal.
Three Legal Mistakes That Could Cost You Your Home - or More
By: Jonathan Cooper | 25/07/2008 | LawThis article addresses three common - and potentially disastrous - mistakes that people make when they have been sued, and provides practical suggestions to avoid them.
Three Deadly Sins That Can Ruin a Mold Case
By: Jonathan Cooper | 23/07/2008 | LawThis article discusses the importance of appropriate mold testing and allergy testing to mold claims from the vantage point of the property owner and the personal injury plaintiff.