Cable Television and Local Telephone Providers

<h1>Cable Television and Local Telephone Providers</h1>Author: <a title="Sammy Beanard" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/sammy-beanard/40008.htm">Sammy Beanard</a> Cable television and local telephone service are the most obvious markets where more competition is necessary. Both are currently monopolized by existing providers, prompting government regulation to protect consumers from excessive rates.

Yet even though the it is possible for competition to erode these monopolies and thus end or relax current regulation, government regulations still inhibit this competition. In particular, existing law, at varying levels of government, frustrates providers of cable and local telephone services from offering both services, in full competition with each other, in the same service territories.

Second, while several competitors certainly have made significant inroads in long distance telephone markets, there is room for more competition. AT&T still has about 60 percent of long-distance traffic.

Third, while telephone equipment is now probably the most competitive of the markets affected by the MFJ, even this market could use additional competition.

Here, too, AT&T continues to have a leading share of the market, although it faces stiff competition from numerous other providers, domestic and foreign. Given their expertise in the industry, some or all of the RBOCs may be natural entrants into developing and manufacturing telecommunications equipment, especially for network switching, but are precluded from entry by the MFJ.

Under the right terms and conditions, entry by the RBOCs into these activities could help spur innovation and bring down prices for telecommunications equipment. In the process, the RBOCs could help make American firms even more competitive in the international telecommunications equipment market.

Ultimately, effective competition in local telephone markets will provide the best protection against cross-subsidization and discrimination by the RBOCs, since without market power RBOCs will be unable to leverage their local telephone monopolies into other markets.

However, until local telephone markets are competitive, entry tests and structural safeguards, such as separate subsidiaries that allow for objective analyses by regulators of pricing, cross-subsidization, and discrimination are important means available to ensure that local telephone customers are not charged with the costs of long-distance service and manufacturing, and that markets are not distorted by unfair and cross-subsidized pricing.

In addition, policymakers should encourage competition to cable television from other firms and technologies, which will reduce the market power that existing cable operators maintain in their markets throughout the country.About the Author: Sammy Beanard has researched and written about the telecommunications business and other issues. 
 
To see more of his writing, visit his articles about <a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Free-Reverse-Phone-Directory---The-Truth-About-Reverse-Phone-Directories&id=1160440">free reverse phone directory</a> searches and <a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Public-Criminal-Records&id=1160388">public criminal records</a> sites.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/cable-television-and-local-telephone-providers-420773.html" title="Cable Television and Local Telephone Providers">Cable Television and Local Telephone Providers</a>

Cable television and local telephone service are the most obvious markets where more competition is necessary. Both are currently monopolized by existing providers, prompting government regulation to protect consumers from excessive rates.

Yet even though the it is possible for competition to erode these monopolies and thus end or relax current regulation, government regulations still inhibit this competition. In particular, existing law, at varying levels of government, frustrates providers of cable and local telephone services from offering both services, in full competition with each other, in the same service territories.

Second, while several competitors certainly have made significant inroads in long distance telephone markets, there is room for more competition. AT&T still has about 60 percent of long-distance traffic.

Third, while telephone equipment is now probably the most competitive of the markets affected by the MFJ, even this market could use additional competition.

Here, too, AT&T continues to have a leading share of the market, although it faces stiff competition from numerous other providers, domestic and foreign. Given their expertise in the industry, some or all of the RBOCs may be natural entrants into developing and manufacturing telecommunications equipment, especially for network switching, but are precluded from entry by the MFJ.

Under the right terms and conditions, entry by the RBOCs into these activities could help spur innovation and bring down prices for telecommunications equipment. In the process, the RBOCs could help make American firms even more competitive in the international telecommunications equipment market.

Ultimately, effective competition in local telephone markets will provide the best protection against cross-subsidization and discrimination by the RBOCs, since without market power RBOCs will be unable to leverage their local telephone monopolies into other markets.

However, until local telephone markets are competitive, entry tests and structural safeguards, such as separate subsidiaries that allow for objective analyses by regulators of pricing, cross-subsidization, and discrimination are important means available to ensure that local telephone customers are not charged with the costs of long-distance service and manufacturing, and that markets are not distorted by unfair and cross-subsidized pricing.

In addition, policymakers should encourage competition to cable television from other firms and technologies, which will reduce the market power that existing cable operators maintain in their markets throughout the country.

Sammy Beanard has researched and written about the telecommunications business and other issues.

To see more of his writing, visit his articles about free reverse phone directory searches and public criminal records sites.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/cable-television-and-local-telephone-providers-420773.html

Article Tags: Cable, Competition, Telecommunications, Monopolies

Related Articles
Related Q&A

Latest Law Articles
More from Sammy Beanard

Determining Which Party Bears Risk of Loss for Shipments Governed by the Uniform Commercial Code

By: Leo K. Barnes, Jr. (Barnes & Barnes, P.C.) | 10/11/2009
The Uniform Commercial Code’s section regarding Risk of Loss is a great example of why counsel’s periodic review of a client’s day-to-day operations may prove to be an excellent investment in light of the serious ramifications which can bind clients in seemingly benign transactions.

Do you want a criminal lawyer? You ought to know how to choose him!

By: Curt Cote | 10/11/2009
The penal case is very serious one and you shouldn't vacillate for a long time searching for a well competent attorney. But simultaneously your decision about your attorney must be mature because your attorney is the only human who is able to protect you or your relatives from charge. Thus as we see the principal role of the criminal attorney like any other lawyer is to represent the defendant within the legal procedure and speak for his privileges and liberty. Thus in a case you ...

The chief human in break up operation – your divorceattorney

By: Omar Brady | 10/11/2009
Divorce isn't very joyful case. As usual one side desires it and other contravenes. But in a case making ready for break up each must be ready for any result. That's why everything must be deeply considered. Firstly provided you don't desire to lose you must find out skillful break up lawyer who will defend your privileges. Just fancy what may happen in a case you'll find out Bad Attorney! You'll simply don't reac...

Law firms planning for the good times ahead

By: Martindale-Hubbell | 10/11/2009
History tells us that all economic downturns are invariably followed by another period of sustained growth – typically lasting between seven to ten years. . Stock markets always run ahead of the real economy. They are an indicator of what will happen in the next six to nine months. Marketing managers of law firms should make use of this understanding of the economic cycle when planning and timing their firm’s future marketing spend.

Legal Q&A

By: isfaq | 10/11/2009
Am I Entitled To A Deposit Return When Landlords Change? My landlord sold the building to someone else and i need to know if I'm entitled to the security deposit pay for even if I'm still staying in the apartment. It all depends on the agreement between your landlord and the unusual buyer. Basically,...

Fight Against Accident Benefit Fraud

By: Martha Vasquez | 10/11/2009
One type of insurance fraud that has been steadily increasing is accident benefit fraud. Auto accident fraud is when one makes a claim to collect money from insurance companies for Motor Vehicle Collisions they did not receive, or repairs that did not take place. Auto accident fraud costs insurers billions...

Divorce Lawyer

By: George Sandler | 10/11/2009
Unlike many other types of lawyers, divorce lawyers are called to deal with a possible emotional breakdown of a relationship and, as such, if you use one must be sure they are reliable competent in their field and have the right attitude. Regarding experience, should be able to demonstrate that at least half of their work involves divorce and have the bargaining power of divorce as well. However, none of this will be something good without absolute confidence in their abilities.

Life in the UK Test: What is it and Why do I Need to Take It?

By: Gazala Rashid | 09/11/2009
If you intend to be naturalized as a British Citizen or to apply for indefinite leave to remain in the UK, you might need to take a Life in the UK Test. The test was first introduced in November 2005 and comprises of 24 multiple-choice questions based on specific knowledge...

Piltdown Man : the Revenge

By: Sammy Beanard | 20/07/2008 | Science
The Piltdown Man is an infamous fake "missing link", a forged ancestor of all mankind. This article discusses his fall from grace.

Individual Blame or Societal Irresponsibility?

By: Sammy Beanard | 13/07/2008 | Politics
A look at how society itself can have a share of blame in crime.

A Lesson in Welfare - My Own Story

By: Sammy Beanard | 08/06/2008 | Cyber Law
I know what it is like to lie awake at night and worry about not having health care and health insurance for my babies. I know how hard it is to find good, dependable child care.

How Investigations are Sometimes Comprimised by the Law

By: Sammy Beanard | 22/05/2008 | Cyber Law
Sometimes the law can act as a barrier to a criminal investigation. This article gives examples.

The Drug Enforcement Agency and the Freedom of Information Act

By: Sammy Beanard | 22/05/2008 | Cyber Law
The DEA undertook a detailed analysis of the effect of the Freedom of Information Act on DEA's investigative operations. This article covers some of their findings.

Deteriorating Police Relations Caused by the Freedom of Information Act

By: Sammy Beanard | 22/05/2008 | Cyber Law
As a result of the Freedom of Information Act, police are finding it harder to get the information they need from various companied and organisation.

Specific Problems With the Freedom of Information Act

By: Sammy Beanard | 22/05/2008 | Cyber Law
The freedom of information act has made it possible for all of us to enjoy a greater degree of freedom, but the act is not without its downsides.

Cable Television and Local Telephone Providers

By: Sammy Beanard | 20/05/2008 | Law
Cable television and local telephone service are the most obvious markets where more competition is necessary. Both are currently monopolized by existing providers, prompting government regulation to protect consumers from excessive rates.