Rob McKay MA(Hons) is an Industrial/Organisational Psychologist and Director of AssessSystems Aust/NZ Ltd. He specialises in employee assessment for selection and development and has over 30 years of practical hands on business experience. He can be contacted on +64 9 414 6030 rob@assess.co.nz - For general information go to www.assess.co.nz - To download recruitment kits go to www.HelpMeHireRight.com - For weekly delivery of articles like the above subscribe now at - www.assessnewsletter.com
I think you’ll agree there is greater awareness these days of management incompetence. Not a week goes by without the business press reporting another large local or overseas company in trouble.
Right now we are seeing a lot of business commentary on the failure of finance companies, along with scathing accusations on the competence of their leaders. In most cases, this is highly justified. I can say this with confidence as I have personally been burnt by four of them!
I don’t think managers today are any more incompetent than they were when I entered the workforce. There is a consensus (Hogan 2007) that the increased use of climate surveys by organisations has given a greater voice for workers to highlight poor management processes.
The old saying, “The buck stops at the top” is so true. Organisations that are struggling usually have an incompetent leader. An article in a recent edition of the Harvard Business Review places the blame fairly and squarely on the shoulder of the people involved in the hiring process - usually the board of directors.
This led renowned business writer Ram Charan to quip, “It’s interesting to observe the length company directors go to doing due diligent on impending company buy-outs or mergers, yet they usually place the fate of these acquisitions in the hands of people who were appointed on a handshake.”
Fernandez and Araoz (1999) attribute executive failure, and indeed organisational collapse, on the initial recruitment process of its leader. They outline “Ten Deadly Traps” company boards (or the chairperson) fall into during the executive selection process:
1. Trying to replicate the person who just left.
2. Not being clear what the job to be filled actually is.
3. Choosing the candidate based on his or her response to your favourite questions.
4. Taking interview answers at face value.
5. Believing the reports of referees and not doing a thorough background check.
6. Hiring someone who is just like you.
7. Allowing junior personnel, or a recruitment agent to run the hiring process.
8. Hiring the person using an unstructured interview.
9. Ignoring or failing to check “under the waterline” – a psychometric profile to check personality attributes and mental ability.
10. Members of the selection committee hiring in a weaker candidate to enhance their own chances of getting ahead.
The above seems to make common sense given the criticism of the interview process. Serious flaws of personality and character coexist quite nicely with excellent social skills. About the only thing an unstructured selection interview can evaluate is social skill (Hogan 2007).
The literature is very clear that personality and leadership are closely connected – who you are determines how you lead – and the standard measures of normal personality characteristics are robust predictors of leadership performance (Hogan 2007).
So the next time you read, hear or view a commentary on an organisation in trouble take a close look at the leadership. Do you think the leader is falling short on any of Elmer’s (2003) key themes of leadership success?
- The ability to maintain self control
- They treat others with respect irrespective of the person’s level in the organisation.
- The ability to build, motivate and maintain a team(s) to a common goal.
- The ability to assert control of others to the right degree, in the right amount, at the right time.
- Integrity
It is a very easy task to translate the above themes into a language of personality and link these to specific job competencies – that is exactly what the ASSESS psychometric platform does.
In summary, failing companies are usually driven by incompetent leaders who are hired by boards of directors who fail to adhere to a structured selection process and don’t check “below the waterline”. They place all their selection weight on the candidate’s knowledge, experience and skill to lead their organisation – can they do the job?
But the bigger burning question is, “How will they do the job?” A validated psychometric assessment will answer this question. Hiring directors usually defer to gut feel in this department. First impressions can be dangerous. Just because the person is outward going, exudes self-confidence, is articulate and well presented doesn’t mean they will be exceptional leaders. It does however tell you that they are very good at interviews, and let’s face it, this is the very best you are going to see in this person.
If the candidate doesn’t have the personality, mental ability, values and motives of a leader the directors will be placing their company in the hands of another failing executive.
- Related Articles
- Related Q&A
- Laws on Leadership
- Are Leaders Born Or Made?
- Leadership Crisis and Failures in Nigeria
- Leadership and Risk Taking
- How Can We Define Leadership
- Environmental Leadership – the New Leadership Style of the not so Distant Future
- Leadership Skills and Leadership Qualities
- Be The Leader That Others Want To Follow




The Cost of Comfort, the Cost of Change
By: Jonathan Grigg | 12/11/2009This piece explores some of the pains experienced by organizations who remain in their comfort zone even though the writing may be on the wall.
Storytelling and Leadership
By: Latest Business Report/voice Of News | 12/11/2009A journey of dots with colors of told and untold stories of known and unknown stories. I should be known long with my stories with passing wave & time”, Robin Trehan
Appian FORUM09 Conference Recap
By: Market Wire | 09/11/2009Largest BPM Vendor Event of the Year Highlights New Product, New Services and New Community
Ensuring cohesion between management and employees
By: Christina Pomoni | 09/11/2009Ensuring cohesion in the organization is a fundamental performance and efficiency issue. On the shoulders of cohesion rests the heavy load of ensuring the strategic direction of an organization is known, understood and, most importantly, acted on.
Management As A System
By: Craig Nathanson | 09/11/2009A management system also has many processes on multiple levels. They all contribute to the health of the management system.
Personalities I admire: Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam
By: hasan yahya | 07/11/2009Muhammad,(pbuh), the Prophet, the state person, the most influential in history to make change, the man, the leader and most beloved among Muslims. This article is an attribute to this great person which the author admired.
Leadership at Peace and War in Islam
By: hasan yahya | 07/11/2009This is a glimpse of Islamic history during the Prophet’s life and after in terms of leadership in peace and war times. Which is critical for human rights included later in the UN codes on war and peace times.
Change, Plan, Execute - This is your paradigm speaking
By: Jonathan Grigg | 07/11/2009A brief discussion piece highlighting why organisational change programs often produce less than satisfactory results and how to overcome this.
The 7 Bases to Cover When Hiring New People
By: Robin McKay | 10/09/2009 | Human ResourcesOn our ‘Tips for Hiring’ website we ask subscribers “What is the most burning question you have When Hiring New Employees?” In most cases the questions are very similar, however yesterday we got an interesting one that I would like to share with you. Diane du Preez from South Africa asked: “What are the top ten obvious things I should look out for to let me know the candidate is not right for me?”
When Hiring, What Are the Most Import Attributes to Look For?
By: Robin McKay | 01/04/2009 | Human ResourcesSeveral years ago, two well respected organisational psychologists, Bartram and Lindley, conducted a survey of managers (n=875) and graduate students (n=150). The purpose was to measure the attributes that these people considered the most important when it comes to selecting new employees or applying for a new position - what attributes do these managers/graduates see as critical “must haves” to be successful in the role?
Why are Traditional Hiring Interviews so Unreliable?
By: Robin McKay | 01/02/2009 | Human ResourcesWhy do employees - hired by the same methods, doing the same job, and managed by the same person - perform so differently? Dependency on the traditional one-on-one unstructured interview is a prime reason.
Voluntary Commitment, a Powerful Influencer
By: Robin McKay | 13/11/2008 | Managementfter many years of research, social psychologist Robert Cialdini has identified six powerful and universal principles of persuasion. In nearly every influence situation we encounter there will be at least one of these six waiting for us to use.
The Big 5 - Animals and Personality
By: Robin McKay | 01/10/2008 | Human ResourcesI recently travelled to South Africa on business and took a few days off to do a walking safari to see the Big 5. Even in the African bush it's hard to forget work as the Big 5 is also an acronym for the theory of personality.
Time is Money - We Always Underestimate the Cost of our Personal Time
By: Robin McKay | 11/09/2008 | ManagementThe old saying “time is money” originated with the Greeks and dates back to 430 BC. So, if “time is money” then exactly how much?
Sex, Lies and Video Tapes - Identify Bad Attitude Before You Hire it
By: Robin McKay | 03/09/2008 | ManagementAs managers, our fundamental principle is to ensure a profit (or least of which, ensure break-even for non-profit organisations) and protect the assets - plain and simple. Everything we do should be centred on this core mantra. It amazes me how many times in business (and political) processes; this fundamental charge is ignored or even wilfully violated.
The Accuracy of Psychometric Tests - How Much Testing is Too Much?
By: Robin McKay | 24/08/2008 | Human ResourcesAddressing a recent HR conference last week, I was asked, "How much testing is too much?" A Good question. The answer is not clear cut, but one thing is for sure, I believe anything over a couple of hours is overkill and a waste of time and money. In this article I have also outline different types of selection profiles and their correlation to job performance. I think this will help you made a sensible decision that won't break the bank or drive your candidates to the edge of despair!