1. Suresh Kandulapati, MBA, M.Phil, (Ph.D.) Asst. Professor, Aurora's Scientific, Technological and Research Academy, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad-500 005, AP, India. Mobile: +91-9177391989 ksuresh448@gmail.com 2. Dr. G. Purushothamachari, M.Com, MBA, Ph.D. Professor, Aurora's Scientific, Technological and Research Academy, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad-500 005, AP, India.
THE GAP BETWEEN EXPECTED AND ACTUAL SERVICE QUALITY OF ORGANIZED RETAIL STORES IN HYDERABAD
ABSTRACT
This study assesses the gap between expected and actual service quality of retail stores in Hyderabad. Improving service quality is believed to improve profitability and enhance retail store performance. Such improvements however, require monitoring and continuous measurement of performance along service dimensions that determine standards of service quality. Majority of the retail stores in Hyderabad are operating the stores approximately up to the satisfaction level of their customers. Broadly, customers found no difference between their expected service quality and actual service quality of retail stores in Hyderabad.
INTRODUCTION
The organized retailing is growing faster in the big Tier I cities viz., Delhi, Chennai, Mumbai, Bangalore and Hyderabad, as well as in Tier II & III cities. Still, the organized retail sector in India is at a very nascent stage and its market share is around 4% of the total market. Though, organised retail look big and growing, it is lag behind the traditional stores in satisfying a customer. Street corner mom n pop store give the benefit of accessibility along with the convenience of home delivery (even for a single unit purchase), top of which it also provides petty credit to its customers. There is a sense of trust shared between the customer and shopkeeper which in some cases come over generations of purchases. Still organized retail is not able to dent into the unorganized retail market , as they still radiate a feeling of being expensive and instigating loose buying ( especially in Tier 2 & 3 cities ). Therefore the present study focused on the assessment the gap between expected and actual service quality of organized retail stores in Hyderabad.
Improving service quality is believed to improve profitability and enhance retail store performance. Such improvements however, require monitoring and continuous measurement of performance along service dimensions that determine standards of service quality. This study assesses the service quality of retail stores in Hyderabad with special reference on expected and actual service quality.
Service Quality
Juran (1999) defines customer led quality as, “feature of products which meet customer’s needs and thereby provide satisfaction”, and service quality relates to meeting customers’ needs, ‘perceived service quality’ is identified to understand the consumer. Zeithaml (1987) defined perceived quality as ‘the consumers’ judgment about an entity’s overall excellence or superiority’, which can be viewed as distinct from ‘objective’ quality in as much as it is a form of attitude, related in part to satisfaction, and resulting from a comparison of expectations with perceptions of performance.
Measuring Service Quality
Service quality is a concept that has aroused considerable interest and debate in the research literature because of the difficulties in both defining it and measuring it with no overall consensus emerging on either. There always exists an important question: Why should service quality be measured? Measurement allows for comparison before and after changes, for the location of quality related problems and for the establishment of clear standards for service delivery.
Five – Dimensions of Service Quality
Dabholkar (1996) developed the Retail Service Quality Scale (RSQS) to study retailing-related dimensions. The scale that has high construct reliability and validity in measuring service quality in a department store includes:
- Physical Aspects
- Reliability
- Personal Interaction
- Problem-Solving
- Policy
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The purpose of the study is to assess the gap between expected and actual service quality of organized retail stores of Hyderabad. Accordingly, the study has the following objectives:
- To investigate the dimensions of service quality related to the retail sector in general.
- To identify the service the service quality differences between the expected service and perceived services of retail stores in Hyderabad.
Sampling Method and Sample Size
Simple random and convenience sampling was applied. Data was collected from the customers of various retail stores in Hyderabad.
Data Collection
The primary data was collected from 100 customers by administering a structured questionnaire. The secondary data was collected from various journals, magazines, and websites. The collected data was analyzed by using statistical tools such as mean and weighted averages. The attributes of each dimension is analyzed in detail.
Methods and Statistical Tools used
The RSQS scale was applied to measure five-dimensions of service quality viz., Physical Aspects, Reliability, Personal Interaction, Problem-Solving Capacity and Empathy.
Likert five –point scale was also employed for the study. Respondents were asked to evaluate parameters on overall service quality in a five-point scale anchored at ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘strongly agree’. The questionnaire consists of 15 statements on expectations and 15 statements on perceptions. On comparing the two aspects like expectations and actual service encountered, one can know the gap. To test the hypothesis ?2-test is applied in appropriate context.
Dimensions
The following sub-dimensions were included in the questionnaire:
Physical Aspects
-
- This store has modern-looking equipment and fixtures.
- The physical facilities at this store are visually appealing.
- Materials associated with this store’s service (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing.
- This store has clean, attractive, and convenient public areas (restrooms, fitting room).
- The store layout makes it easy for customers to find what they need.
- The store layout makes it easy for customers to move around the store.
Reliability
- When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so.
- This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records.
Personal Interaction
- Employees in this store give prompt service to customers.
- Employees in this store are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests.
- Employees in this store are consistently courteous with customers.
Problem-Solving Capacity
- When a customer has a problem, this store shows a sincere interest in solving it.
- Employees of this store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately.
Empathy
- This store offers high quality merchandise.
- This store gives customers individual attention.
Hypothesis
The current study presumed that there is no significant difference between the expected and actual service quality of retail stores in Hyderabad. Further it is assumed that there is no significant difference between expected physical aspects, reliability, personal interaction, problem solving and empathy and actual physical aspects, reliability, personal interaction, problem solving and empathy.
Demographic Profile of Respondents
Gender
The majority of respondents (86%) were male (Table 1).
Gender
Frequency
Percentage
Male
86
86%
Female
14
14%
Total
100
100%
Table 1: Gender Figure 1: Gender
Source: Primary data
Income Status
The respondents were from all income groups (Table 2). The majority of respondents (52%) were from the income group of 10001-20000.
Table 2: Income Status
Income Range
Male
Female
Total
Up to Rs. 5000
12
2
14
Rs. 5001-10000
16
2
18
Rs. 10001-15000
20
6
26
Rs. 15001-20000
24
2
26
Rs. 20001-25000
10
0
10
Above Rs. 25000
4
2
6
Total
86
14
100
Source: Primary data
Figure 2: Income Status
Physical Aspects
Table 5 shows that materials associated with retail store’s services (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing. The respondents feel that modern-looking equipment and fixtures, physical facilities, the ambience and store layout are up to the mark.
Table 3: Expected physical Aspects
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
The store has modern-looking equipment and fixtures (A)
0
10
26
42
22
100
The physical facilities at this store are visually appealing (B)
0
12
14
62
12
100
Materials associated with this store’s service (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing (C)
2
12
34
40
12
100
The store has clean, attractive, and convenient public areas (restrooms, fitting room) (D)
2
12
20
42
24
100
The store layout at this store makes it easy for customers to find what they need (E)
6
2
28
46
18
100
The store layout at this store makes it easy for customers to move around the store (F)
0
6
24
42
28
100
Total
10
54
146
274
116
600
Source: Primary data
Figure 3: Expected physical Aspects
Table 4: Actual physical Aspects
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
The store has modern-looking equipment and fixtures (A)
0
10
40
40
10
100
The physical facilities at this store are visually appealing (B)
0
22
18
54
6
100
Materials associated with this store’s service (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing (C)
6
4
36
42
12
100
The store has clean, attractive, and convenient public areas (restrooms, fitting room) (D)
6
22
30
24
18
100
The store layout at this store makes it easy for customers to find what they need (E)
0
8
36
42
14
100
The store layout at this store makes it easy for customers to move around the store (F)
2
12
32
42
12
100
Total
14
78
192
244
72
600
Source: Primary data
Figure 4: Actual physical Aspects
Table 5: Physical Aspects
Parameters
Expected service (E) (weighted average)
Actual Service (A) (weighted average)
Difference
(E-A)
(weighted average)
The store has modern-looking equipment and fixtures (A)
3.76
3.50
0.26
The physical facilities at this store are visually appealing (B)
3.74
3.44
0.30
Materials associated with this store’s service (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing (C)
3.48
3.50
-0.02
The store has clean, attractive, and convenient public areas (restrooms, fitting room) (D)
3.74
3.26
0.48
The store layout at this store makes it easy for customers to find what they need (E)
3.68
3.62
0.06
The store layout at this store makes it easy for customers to move around the store (F)
3.92
3.50
0.42
Source: Primary data
Figure 5: Physical Aspects
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between expected and actual physical aspects.
By applying Chi-square test, the table value for 5 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is 11.07. The calculated value of ?2 0.9996 is much lower than the table value. Hence, the result of the experiment supports the hypothesis. We can thus conclude that, “There is no significant difference between actual and expected physical aspects”.
Reliability
Table 8 shows that there is no remarkable difference between expected and actual reliability with reference to time management and error-free sales transactions and records by the retail stores.
Table 6: Expected Reliability
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so (A)
4
4
26
40
26
100
This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records (B)
2
8
20
44
26
100
Total
6
12
46
84
52
200
Source: Primary data
Figure 6: Expected Reliability
Table 7: Actual Reliability
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so (A)
10
18
34
32
6
100
This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records (B)
2
10
42
36
10
100
Total
12
28
76
68
16
200
Source: Primary data
Figure 7: Actual Reliability
Table 8: Reliability
Parameters
Expected service (E) (weighted average)
Actual Service (A) (weighted average)
Difference (E-A)
(weighted average)
When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so (A)
3.80
3.06
0.74
This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records (B)
3.84
3.42
0.42
Source: Primary data
Figure 8: Reliability
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between actual and expected reliability by customers.
By applying Chi-square test, the table value for 1 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is 3.841. The calculated value of ?2 0.663 is much lower than the table value. Hence, the result of the experiment supports the hypothesis. We can thus conclude that, “There is no significant difference between actual and expected reliability”.
Personal Interaction
From Table 11 it is clear that the customers feel that employees are consistently courteous with customers. 26 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that the employees in the stores give prompt service to customers. Similarly, 26 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that the employees in the stores are consistently courteous with customers. 28 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that employees in the stores are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests.
Table 9: Expected Personal Interaction
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
Employees in this store give prompt service to customers (A)
4
4
24
42
26
100
Employees in this store are consistently courteous with customers (B)
2
12
22
38
26
100
Employees in this store are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests (C)
0
12
20
40
28
100
Total
6
28
66
120
80
300
Source: Primary data
Figure 9: Expected Personal Interaction
Table 10: Actual Personal Interaction
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
Employees in this store give prompt service to customers (A)
2
16
20
48
14
100
Employees in this store are consistently courteous with customers (B)
2
10
38
36
14
100
Employees in this store are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests (C)
2
18
26
34
20
100
Total
6
44
84
118
48
300
Source: Primary data
Figure 10: Actual Personal Interaction
Table 11: Personal Interaction
Parameters
Expected service (E) (in terms weighted average)
Actual Service (A) (in terms weighted average)
Difference (E-A)
(in terms weighted average)
Employees in this store give prompt service to customers (A)
3.82
3.56
0.26
Employees in this store are consistently courteous with customers (B)
3.74
3.50
0.24
Employees in this store are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests (C)
3.84
3.52
0.32
Source: Primary data
Figure 11: Personal Interaction
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between actual and expected personal interaction of executives with customers.
By applying Chi-square test, the table value for 2 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is 5.991. The calculated value of ?2 0.971 is much lower than the table value. Hence, the result of the experiment supports the hypothesis. We can thus conclude that, “There is no significant difference between actual and expected personal interaction of executives with customers”.
Problem-Solving Capacity
Table 14 shows that sales persons are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately. 48% of the respondents are strongly agreed that employees of the store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately. 34% of the respondents are agreed that when a customer has a problem, the store shows a sincere interest in solving it.
Table 12: Expected Problem-Solving Capacity
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
When a customer has a problem, this store shows a sincere interest in solving it (A)
2
4
28
34
20
100
Employees of this store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately (B)
0
8
10
34
48
100
Total
2
12
38
68
68
200
Source: Primary data
Figure 12: Expected Problem-Solving Capacity
Table 13: Actual Problem-Solving Capacity
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
When a customer has a problem, this store shows a sincere interest in solving it (A)
6
16
26
32
20
100
Employees of this store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately (B)
4
32
12
26
26
100
Total
10
48
38
58
46
200
Source: Primary data
Figure 13: Actual Problem-Solving Capacity
Table 14: Problem-Solving Capacity
Parameters
Expected service (E) (weighted average)
Actual Service (A) (weighted average)
Difference (E-A)
(weighted average)
When a customer has a problem, this store shows a sincere interest in solving it (A)
3.90
3.44
0.46
Employees of this store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately (B)
4.22
3.70
0.52
Source: Primary data
Figure 14: Problem-Solving Capacity
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between actual and expected customer problem solving capacity to store executives.
By applying Chi-square test, the table value for 1 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is 3.841. The calculated value of ?2 0.731 is much lower than the table value. Hence, the result of the experiment supports the hypothesis. We can thus conclude that, “There is no significant difference between actual and expected customer problem solving capacity to store executives”.
Empathy
According to Table 17, the qualities of merchandise are up to mark and employees are giving individual attention to the customers. 34% of the respondents are agreed that the store offers high quality merchandise. Similarly, 34% of the respondents also agreed that the store gives customers individual attention.
Table 15: Expected Empathy
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
The store offers high quality merchandise (A)
6
8
34
34
18
100
This store gives customers individual attention (B)
2
18
26
34
20
100
Total
8
26
60
68
38
200
Source: Primary data
Figure 15: Expected Empathy
Table 16: Actual Empathy
Parameters
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Total
Number of Respondents
The store offers high quality merchandise (A)
6
10
34
46
4
100
This store gives customers individual attention (B)
8
18
24
32
18
100
Total
14
28
58
78
22
200
Source: Primary data
Figure 16: Actual Empathy
Table 17: Empathy
Parameters
Expected service (E) (in terms weighted average)
Actual Service (A) (in terms weighted average)
Difference (E-A)
(in terms weighted average)
The store offers high quality merchandise (A)
3.50
3.32
0.18
This store gives customers individual attention (B)
3.52
3.34
0.18
Source: Primary data
Figure 17: Empathy
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between actual and expected store empathy.
By applying Chi-square test, the table value for 1 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is 3.841. The calculated value of ?2 0.892 is much lower than the table value. Hence, the result of the experiment supports the hypothesis. We can thus conclude that, “There is no significant difference between actual and expected store empathy”.
FINDINGS- The materials associated with retail store’s services (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing. The respondents feel that modern-looking equipment and fixtures, physical facilities, the ambience and store layout are up to the mark. It can also found that there is no significant difference between actual and expected physical aspects.
- There is no remarkable difference between expected and actual reliability with reference to time management and error-free sales transactions and records by the retail stores. Further it is found that there is no significant difference between actual and expected reliability.
- The customers feel that employees are consistently courteous with customers. 26 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that the employees in the stores give prompt service to customers. Similarly, 26 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that the employees in the stores are consistently courteous with customers. 28 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that employees in the stores are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests. It can also found that there is no significant difference between actual and expected personal interaction of executives with customers.
- Sales persons are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately. 48% of the respondents are strongly agreed that employees of the store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately. Similarly, 34% of the respondents are agreed that when a customer has a problem, the store shows a sincere interest in solving it. Further it is also found that there is no significant difference between actual and expected customer problem solving capacity to store executives.
- The qualities of merchandise are up to mark and employees are giving individual attention to the customers. 34% of the respondents are agreed that the store offers high quality merchandise. Similarly, 34% of the respondents also agreed that the store gives customers individual attention. It is also found that there is no significant difference between actual and expected store empathy.
Though, the current study revels that organized retail stores are operating up to the desired level of its customers, still they are lag behind the traditional stores in attracting and satisfying a customer. Some of the main tips for the modern retail sector to attract all types of customers are:
i. Small sized retail stores along with more accessibility and convince of home delivery even for a single unit purchase.
ii. The employees and management should be well versed with local language, they should give common attention towards the customers irrespective of their economic and social status.
iii. The direction and information boards should be written in local language.
iv. The stores should take steps to minimize the waiting time of the customers before the billing line and delivery line etc.
v. The employees should pay attention always while inviting customer to enhance the sense of trust shared between the customer and the store, which in some cases come over generations of purchases.
THE GAP BETWEEN EXPECTED AND ACTUAL SERVICE QUALITY OF ORGANIZED RETAIL STORES IN HYDERABAD
Please note that this research is being conducted purely in the interests of academic research and is not funded by any institute. Respondent’s details or responses will be analyzed; information will not be forwarded to any for commercial purposes. Personal data provided by respondents will be processed and kept confidential.
Section A: Demography of Respondent
- Name: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Gender: i. Male ( ) ii. Female ( )
- Age: -----------------------------------
- Marital Status: i. Married ( ) ii. Unmarried ( )
- Occupation:
- Income Category:
- Up to Rs. 5,000
- Rs. 5,001-10,000
- Rs. 10,001-15,000
- Rs. 15,001-20,000
- Rs. 20,001-25,000
- Above Rs. 25,000
Section B: Please express your opinion on the following questions regarding a ‘More Retail Store’ by marking an appropriate number.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
1. The store has modern-looking equipment and fixtures.
1
2
3
4
5
2. The physical facilities at the store are visually appealing.
1
2
3
4
5
3. Materials associated with store’s service (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) are visually appealing.
1
2
3
4
5
4. The store has clean, attractive, and convenient public areas (try rooms, fitting room)
1
2
3
4
5
5. The store layout makes it easy for customers to find what they need.
1
2
3
4
5
6. The store layout makes it easy for customers to move around the store.
1
2
3
4
5
7. When the store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so.
1
2
3
4
5
8. The store insists on error-free sales transactions and records.
1
2
3
4
5
9. Sales person in the store give prompt service to customers.
1
2
3
4
5
10. Sales person in the store are consistently courteous with customers.
1
2
3
4
5
11. Sales person in the store are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests.
1
2
3
4
5
12. The store offers high quality merchandise.
1
2
3
4
5
13. The store gives customers individual attention.
1
2
3
4
5
14. When a customer has a problem, the store shows a sincere interest in solving it.
1
2
3
4
5
15. Sales person of the store are able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately.
1
2
3
4
5
Section C: Please express your opinion on the following questions regarding a Retail Store by marking an appropriate number.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
1. A Retail store should have modern-looking equipments and fixtures.
1
2
3
4
5
2. The physical facilities at a Retail store should be visually appealing.
1
2
3
4
5
3. Materials associated with a Retail store’s service (such as shopping bags, catalogs, or statements) should be visually appealing.
1
2
3
4
5
4. A Retail store must have cleaned, attractive, and convenient public areas (try rooms, fitting room).
1
2
3
4
5
5. The store layout at a Retail store should make it easy for customers to find what they need.
1
2
3
4
5
6. The store layout at a Retail store should make it easy for customers to move around the store.
1
2
3
4
5
7. When a Retail store promises to do something by a certain time, it should do so.
1
2
3
4
5
8. A Retail store must insist on error-free sales transactions and records.
1
2
3
4
5
9. Sales persons in a Retail store should give prompt service to customers.
1
2
3
4
5
10. Sales persons in Retail store should never too busy to respond to customer’s requests.
1
2
3
4
5
11. Sales persons in a Retail store should be consistently courteous with customers.
1
2
3
4
5
12. A Retail store should give customers individual attention.
1
2
3
4
5
13. A Retail store should offer high quality merchandise.
1
2
3
4
5
14. When a customer has a problem, Retail store’s person must show a sincere interest in solving it.
1
2
3
4
5
15. Sales person of Retail store should be able to handle customer complaints directly and immediately.
1
2
3
4
5
References
- Dr. S. V. Pathak, Aditya P. Tripathi (2009), “Customer Shopping Behavior Among Modern Retail Formats: A Study of Delhi & NCR”, Indian Journal of Marketing, February, 2009, pp. 3 – 12.
- Dabholkar P A, Thorpe D I and Rentz J O (1996), “A Measure of Service Quality for Retail Stores: Scale Development and Validation”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 24, No. 1.
- Edvardsen B, Tomasson B and Ovretveit J (1994), Quality of Service: Making it Really Work, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Garvin D A (1983), “Quality on the Line”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 61, pp. 65-73.
- Gronroos C (1982), Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsingfors.
- Hjorth-Anderson C (1984), “The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11, pp. 708-718.
- Holbrook M B and Corfman K P (1985), “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaldrus Rides Again”, in Jacoby J and Olson J (Eds.), Perceived Quality, Lexington Books, MA.
- Juran J M (1999), “How to Think About Quality”, in Juran J M and Godfrey A B (Eds.), Juran’s Quality and Book, 5th Edition, pp. 2.1-2.3, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Nikhil Chandra Shil, Dr. Bhagaban Das (2009), “Analysis of Gap In Service Quality Through SERVQUAL: A Case of Deposit Service Provided By a Bank in Bangladesh”, Indian Journal of Marking, June 2009, pp. 3 – 11.
- Olshavsky R W (1985), “Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision-Making: An Integrated Theoretical Perspective”, in Jacoby J and Olson J (Eds.), Perceived Quality, Lexington Books, MA.
- Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V A and Berry L L (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, pp. 41-50.
- Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V A and Berry L L (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multi-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of the Service Quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 12-40.
- Sasser W E Jnr., Olsen R P and Wyckoff D D (1978), “Management of Service Operations: Text and Cases”, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
- Sunayna Khurana (2008), “Customer Expectation and Perception: A Study of Retail Sector of Haryana State”, The Icfai University Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. III, No. 3, pp. 47-58.
- Wisniewski M (2001), “Using SERVQUAL to Assess Customer Satisfaction with Public Sector Services”, Management Service Quality, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 380-388.
- Zeithaml V A (1987), “Defining and Relating Price, Perceived Quality and Perceived Value”, Report No. 87-101, Cambridge, MA.
- Zeithaml V A, Parasuraman A and Berry L L (1990), “Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations”, The Free Press, New York.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A
- THE GAP BETWEEN EXPECTED AND ACTUAL SERVICE QUALITY OF ORGANIZED RETAIL STORES IN HYDERABAD
- Reliance Retail Limited Launches Its First Jewellery Specialty Store, Reliance Jewels, in Bangalore
- Retail Industry in India:challenges Opportunties and Strategies
- Reliance Retail Launches Its Own Brands – Reliance Footprint
- Reliance Retail Launches Reliance Super in Haryana
- Reliance Super - Reliance Retail Achieves Another Milestone in Haryana
- Retail Store Advertising Boosts Profits By 25K In 30 Days Increase Sales With Business Lists
- Development of Shopping Centers in Ukraine




What Research Says About Selecting the Best Business Name For Your Company
By: Marcia Yudkin | 03/12/2009High-priced branding consultants who huddle together for months to concoct a new company name would like the public to think that effective naming involves secrets revealed only to those who earned a Ph.D. in linguistics, speak 17 languages or learned advertising through working their way up the ranks at a...
Better Business Naming: Does Your Proposed New Company Name Open the Door to Ridicule?
By: Marcia Yudkin | 03/12/2009People who intensely dislike your company or feel wronged by you will always find some way to complain. However, a lack of attention during the naming process can inadvertently make it easier for comedians, protesters and whiners to poke fun at your company. Before finalizing your new company name, run it...
Want a Catchy Company Slogan or Tag Line? Avoid These Five Tragic Mistakes
By: Marcia Yudkin | 03/12/2009A tag line is the little slogan that follows a business name on a web site, in ads, on company stationery and elsewhere. A prime branding opportunity, it presents one of the biggest challenges in marketing. You want something that's catchy, appropriate, appealing and distinctive. The tag line should say...
Crowdsourcing: Three Ways to Find a Great New Company or Product Name Free or at Low Cost
By: Marcia Yudkin | 03/12/2009Increasingly popular, "crowdsourcing" involves inviting a large number of people to perform a task, with a prize promised to the person or team whose work is selected as the winner. Specialized web sites now exist where you can ask people to compete by creating designs for T-shirts, logos or ads....
Five Ideas To Get Advertising-Free
By: Diana White | 03/12/2009When you enter to the Web arena as affiliate marketer, you will soonest realize that Google Adwords is not only easily approached and offers good earnings, but you cannot pay for something inexpensive but not free, which is more than you have in hands. You really need to make money...
How to make money online writing articles and get 10 free web traffic tips
By: Stavros Georgiadis | 03/12/2009Make money online writing articles could be beneficial from many aspects. Why someone should spend time writing articles and how could articles be a top making money way? We discuss some ideas to earn money with articles.
Customer relationship management
By: sheela.s | 03/12/2009Customer service, like any aspect of business, is a practiced art that takes time and effort to master. Treat your customers like your friends and they'll always come back. Customers are the lifeblood of any organization be it a global corporation with thousands of employees and a multi-billion turnover, or a sole trader with a handful of regular customers.
Gel Ink Pens Soar in Sales in the Latter Half Year of 2009
By: cloriswong | 03/12/2009Onccc visited the stationery products & office supplies wholesale market in Yiwu International Trade Mart, and found that the sales of gel ink pens have entered the peak period since December.