 |
Non-compete Contracts as a Tool for Protecting Competitive Edge
Author: Enrico Schaefer  | Posted: 03-05-2007 | Comments: 0 | Views: 45 | Rating: (55)  (?) 
 We live in a highly competitive world where highly paid executives and business persons have easy access to trade, market, and consumer information. Unlike before, these executives and other employees are highly mobile, with the ability to easily move between firms, markets,and even competitors. The problem for the companies who operate within these markets is the danger that this mobility poses to their efforts to best their competition - a danger that can often be minimized through non-compete agreements. As of late, Michigan courts and the Michigan legislature have tried to deal with the realities of our 21rst century marketplace in dealing with the enforceability of non-compete agreements, and have expanded upon the rights of companies to utilize such agreements.
In Michigan, the validity of non-compete agreements is governed by section 4a of the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act, a statute passed by the Legislature in 1987, as well as the many cases interpreting that statute. Together, the statute and the case law set forth the parameters defining those agreements that are enforceable and those that are not. The statute seeks to strike a compromise between the protection of an employer’s competitive business interests and an employee’s right to earn a living. As such, courts interpreting non-compete agreements focus their analysis in four areas:
* The agreement must protect a company’s reasonable competitive business interest. Among the factors in determining whether the agreement protects a reasonable competitive business interest are the employee’s position in the company, compensation paid to that employee and the level and amount of specific competitive information acquired during employment, which may include such areas as trade secrets or special training conferred on the employee.
* The agreement must be reasonable as to the length of time the employee is prohibited from working in the line of business. Again, each case is 'fact sepcific' and numerous factors are analyzed in determine what is a reasonable length fort non-compete contract.
* The agreement must be reasonable as to the geographic area the employer seeks to prevent the employee from working in. While the employee’s immediate area of employment would most likely be upheld as a reasonable territorial restriction, wider restrictions require a greater showing that the agreement seeks to protect the employer’s reasonable competitive business interest.
* The agreement’s restrictions on the type of employment or line of business must be reasonable. Courts will look less favorably on deliberately vague, over-reaching or “blanket” agreements.
The enforcement of con-compete contracts in Michigan courts mainly occur on a case-by-case basis, with remedies that include the issuing of restraining orders or injunctions and the awarding of monetary damages.
To businesses who may be interested in utilizing non-compete agreements, it is important to note that even if one condition of a non-compete agreement is deemed unenforceable, it does not void the remainder of the agreement - leaving the rest of the contract valid and enforceable. Businesses of all types, especially those with multi-state operations, must also understand that the rules for non-compete agreements vary from state to state. What’s enforceable in Michigan may not be in one of our neighbor states. Moreover, in order to effectively face a dispute arising from a non-compete agreement, employers should not delay in acting on known breaches of such agreements. The longer an employer delays between the discovery of unlawful competition and pursuit of a legal remedy, the weaker becomes the employer’s request for injunctive relief.
Like any contract, non-compete agreements define the expectations of each party and are subject to negotiations, depending upon the bargaining strength of the parties. Employers should have legal counsel help draft these agreements to ensure that they meet the employer’s expectations and are enforceable. Employees, on the other hand, should review such agreements carefully to ensure that they understand the restrictions on future employment should they ever leave the company.
Also, be sure to remind those leaving your company of their legal obligations during any exit interview. In this way, employers will strike a favorable, yet serious business tone, while best ensuring that any non-compete agreement can be enforced, should the need arise. In an instance in which a breach is realized, a threat letter is usually the first step to ensure the parties abide by non-compete terms and avoid litigation.
Rate this Article:
Current: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s).
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/national,-state,-local-articles/noncompete-contracts-as-a-tool-for-protecting-competitive-edge-141880.html
|
Submitting articles has become one of the most popular means of generating quality backlinks and targeted traffic to your website. Join us today - It's Free! |
|
Got a Question? Ask.
Ask the community a question about this article:
Frequently Asked Questions
Buy back agreement for my car
By: cluk | 17-08-2008
My Chapter 7 341 meeting is Tuesday. My car is paid for. The attorney said that they would take my car right then and there. This seems extremely unfare since I want to buy it back at its current value. My questions is: Will I have to wait to get my car until a reaffirmation agreement is negotiated? My attorney seems extremely indifferent to my situation!!!!!
How can I get this code enforcement officer off my back and still maintain my right to personal property?
By: Jesse | 16-08-2008
I am being harassed by a code enforcement officer in Garden Grove California. She insist that I am running a garage door business out of my home. I install garage doors and receive phone calls from contractors needing my services and I do have certain garage door related materials at my home but I do not conduct business out of my home nor do I have the kind of activity going on that would be consistant with someone running a business out their home. This Code Enforcement officer has been seen by my neighbors snoping and trespassing on people's property and comes by my home at least 1-2 times per month taking pictures of my truck and anything that is visible on my property. How can I get this person off my back. She threatens me with her obtaining a warrent and going to the state attorney to prosecute me if I don't call her to make an appointment so that she can inspect my property.
Subject/verb agreement with parentheses
By: Marilyn | 15-08-2008
In the following sentence, should the verb be singular or plural (I'm inclined to singular)? "The author (and her husband) is/are very popular." Thanks!
What are some concerns of a sale-and-lease-back ...
By: Mdeboer | 12-08-2008
What are some concerns of a sale-and-lease-back contract?
Copies of signed agreement
By: Brunel Uni | 06-08-2008
If a joint tenancy agreement has been signed by four people, should they all recieve a copy?
Filing a judgement
By: Stacy | 04-08-2008
What type of attorney do I contact to file a judgment due to noncompliance of a marital settlement agreement? Any particular firm for recommendation?
Q&A Powered by: 
More from Enrico Schaefer
The Acpa: Trademark Violations in Domains
By: Enrico Schaefer | 17/05/2007 | Intellectual Property
Defendants are often confused by lawsuits that come from trademark holders who are seeking to have domains that correspond to their trademarks transferred to themselves. This confusion arises from the fact that registrars do little to nothing to validate the legal right of a registrant to a domain during registration.
On the other side, the ACPA protects the rights of many trademark holders when it comes to the use of that trademark in top-level domains.
Domain Name Dispute Resolution: Choosing your Forum
By: Enrico Schaefer | 15/05/2007 | Internet Law
Whereas a civil or ciminal case must be arbitrated in a specified court, domain name dispute cases are resolved through service providers such as WIPO and NAF, providers which serve the same purpose but should not be selected at random.
Udrp Panels: What you Should Know
By: Enrico Schaefer | 10/05/2007 | Intellectual Property
Just as a trial attorney never enters a courtroom without researching his judge, those who arbitrate before a UDRP Panel need to be aware of the views of the panelists, and the rights granted in the UDRP that can be used to shield hostile panelists.
Preventing Domain Name Theft: Beyond the Udrp
By: Enrico Schaefer | 07/05/2007 | Domain Names
While the UDRP is an efficient method for achieving the transfer of domain names that violate trademarks, it has no method for preventing their violation in the first place. Luckily, with some help and active prevention, it is possible to prevent any run-ins with the UDRP.
Pornosquatting: a Domain Name Theft Nightmare
By: Enrico Schaefer | 07/05/2007 | Domain Names
When facing a stolen domain name, or having intended visitors sent over to sites filled with obscene material rather than your own, it is often the most important time to get legal advice and fight to have your trademark restored.
Non-compete Contracts: the Employer Perspective
By: Enrico Schaefer | 02/05/2007 | Strategic Planning
Non-compete and non-solicitation contracts, along with the legal basis upon which they rest, are complex issues that face both employees and their employers and should be totally understood in order to ensure the rights of both parties are protected in the case of a dispute.
The Michigan Sales Represetatives Commission Act: Protecting yourself
By: Enrico Schaefer | 30/04/2007 | National, State, Local
With the Michigan Supreme Court yet to make a decision following the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals one, the specifics of the enforcement of the SRCA has grown more unclear. However, there are things that a producer can do before they face the severe penalties for what the SRCA deems "improper" withholding of sales representative commissions.
Stolen Domain Names: How to Know if you are a Victim
By: Enrico Schaefer | 27/04/2007 | Domain Names
Are you losing visitors to your domain? Are your search engine rankings still yours?
|
|
Law 
