How to Apply the Three Acid Tests of Persuasive Writing
by Philip Yaffe
"If you don't know what you are looking for, you are unlikely to find it, even if it's right in front of your nose." -- Anon
We all write in hopes that our readers will understand what we are saying with minimum effort and maximum pleasure. But how can we be certain that they will?
We can't. However we can greatly improve the odds by abandoning subjective ideas of what constitutes effective writing and replacing them with quasi-objective criteria.
During my 40-year career, I have relied on three such criteria, or "acid tests", that have served me very well. Not just for writing myself, but equally for evaluating the writing of others.
Many people don't actually do much writing themselves, but frequently may have to critique the writing of others. It is of very little use to tell someone that a text isn't "good enough", "interesting enough", or "just doesn't feel right". So work on it. Such fuzzy criticism is not only unhelpful; it can be positively demoralizing.
I am reminded of the story of a junior executive who presented a document he had written to his superior. He was told, "Make it more interesting". Being conscientious (and somewhat fearless), he replied: "Sir, this is the best text I know how to write based on the information I have. Unless you tell me exactly what you are looking for, any way l change it will only make it worse."
Fortunately, the man's superior recognized the wisdom of the comment. In other words, in order to critique usefully, it is necessary to be explicit. This is exactly what my three criteria allow you to do
Actually, it is incorrect to call them "criteria", because they are more than that. They are fundamental principles in the form of formulas that provide step-by-step instructions for producing recognizably well written texts, whatever the format or subject.
If you are the originator, they tell you:
1) How to write your text in the first place
2) How properly to edit it when you have finished
If you are the critic, they tell you:
1) What the text should contain
2) What needs to be done to improve it
Before looking at them in detail, let's first agree what we mean by a well written text. For most people, it has at least two principal characteristics; it must be both "clear" and "concise".
Unfortunately, both of these are "weasel words". They mean different things to different people, as well as different things at different times. This is why we need quasi-objective test, to be certain that these words will mean essentially the same thing to all people all the time.
There is a third aspect of a well written text called "density", for which we also have a quasi-test.
Test for Clarity
According to the Clarity Principle, to be clear a text must do three things:
1. Emphasize what is of key importance.
2. De-emphasize what is of secondary importance.
3. Eliminate what is of no importance.
In short: Cl = EDE
If you follow the formula, when you evaluate a text (yours or someone else's), the first thing you should look for is: Do the key ideas fully stand out?
Key ideas are the concepts and conclusions the writer wants the readers to take away from text. Too many writers shy away from the hard work of defining the key ideas. It is far simpler to say that everything is of key importance, so they put in everything they have. However, unless the writer does the job of defining what he really wants the readers to know, they won't do it for him. They will simply get lost in your text and either give up or come out the other end not knowing what they have read.
Second, check that the text de-emphasizes everything that is of secondary importance. Why? Because if you want readers to recognize and retain the key ideas, then you don’t want them getting lost in the details. Details (information of secondary importance) explain and support the key ideas; they must never overwhelm them.
Finally, you must ruthlessly eliminate everything of no importance. These are bits of information that are neither a key idea nor explain or support a key idea. Nothing in is neutral. Whatever doesn't add to the text, subtracts from it. And so must be deleted.
Test for Conciseness
According to the Conciseness Principle, a well written text should be as:
1. Long as necessary
2. Short as possible
In symbols: Co = LS
"As long as necessary" means covering all the key ideas you identified under “clarity”, and all the information of secondary importance needed to explain and support them. Note that nothing is said here about the number of words, because it is irrelevant. If it takes 500 words to be "as long as necessary", then 500 words must be used. If it takes 1500 words, then this is all right, too.
"As short as possible" means staying as close as you can to the minimum. Not because people prefer short texts. "Long" and "short" are weasel words; in the abstract they have no meaning because what is "long" in one circumstance is "short" in another.
The important point is: All words beyond the minimum tend to damage clarity. Subconsciously, readers will continually be trying to understand why those words are there. And will be continually failing because they serve no purpose.
Test for Density
"Density" is a less familiar concept than clarity and conciseness, but it is equally important. According to the density principle, a text should contain:
1. Precise information
2. Logically linked
In other words: D = PL
Using precise information rather than wishy-washy weasel words aids clarity. For example, if you say it is a “hot” day, what do you mean? One reader might interpret hot as 24° C while another might interpret is as 36° C. However, if you say the temperature outside is 28° C, there is no room for interpretation -- or misinterpretation.
Using precise information also generates confidence, because it tells the reader that the writer really know what he is talking about. This helps to hold the reader’s attention and makes it easier to get key points across.
However, precise data (facts) by themselves are insufficient. To be meaningful, data must be organized to create “information”. There are two important tests to apply when converting data into information.
A. Relevance
Is a particular piece of data really needed? As we have seen, unnecessary data damages clarity and ultimately confidence. Therefore, any data that do not either aid understanding or promote confidence should be rigorously deleted.
B. Misconceptions
The logical link between data must be made explicit to prevent readers from coming to false conclusions. Example: A singular occurrence may be misinterpreted as part of a broad pattern; a general policy may be misinterpreted as applying only in specific circumstances, etc.
To ensure that a logical link is clear, the two pieces of data should be placed as close to each other as possible, preferably right next to each other. When data are widely separated, their logical link is masked. If the writer doesn't make the logical connection, it is unrealistic to expect readers will do so for themselves.
So there they are -- three fundamental "acid tests" for clear, concise, dense writing. Although quasi-objective, these tsts are not a panacea. They require you to think; in fact, they force you to think. And that is their strength, because they guide your thinking to precisely what you should be thinking about.
To repeat the adage at the beginning of this article:
"If you don't know what you are looking for, you are unlikely to find it, even if it's right in front of your nose."
Now you know.
Philip Yaffe is a former reporter/feature writer with The Wall Street Journal and a marketing communication consultant. He currently teaches a course in good writing and good speaking in Brussels, Belgium. His recently published book In the “I” of the Storm: the Simple Secrets of Writing & Speaking (Almost) like a Professional is available from Story Publishers in Ghent, Belgium (storypublishers.be) and Amazon (amazon.com).
For further information, contact:
Philip Yaffe
Brussels, Belgium
Tel: +32 (0)2 660 0405
phil.yaffe@yahoo.com, phil.yaffe@gmail.com
(ArticlesBase SC #465231)
Article Tags:
public speaking
,Business Writing
,Writing Tips
,Effective Writing
,Persuasive Writing
,Clear Writing
,Concise Writing
How Your LSAT Writing Sample is Scored
Find out more about how the written sample part of the LSAT is scored in order to best prepare for the Law School Admission Test. (00:25)
Who Writes the SAT
Laura Rheinauer explains who writes the SAT exam itself, and describes all the steps necessary to prepare for and ace the SAT. (01:17)
The New SAT Writing Section
What is the new writing section about? (01:00)
The Format of the GRE
Find out more about the format and structure of the GRE, or Graduate Record Examinations, a test measuring verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, critical thinking and analytical writing skills. (01:43)
How to Register for the GRE
Find out how you can register for the GRE, or Graduate Record Examinations, a test measuring verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, critical thinking and analytical writing skills. (00:28)
Web traffic is the lifeblood of any internet business! But web traffic with minimal to zero conversions is as good as useless. Thus it is in your interest to ensure that your hard worked for web traffic actually converts into sales. How do you do that? Simple! Use the very best tools at your disposal to achieve such a goal. And those tools are none other than your words. Words are actually the most potent weapon you have in your internet business arsenal so use them to devestating effect!
In today’s world, where the survival of the fittest is the norm, it has become imperative to sharpen one’s technical skills, and more importantly, one’s soft skills. Technical skills can be learnt, applied and measured to an established degree.
Mankind has been plagued by several problems ever since he was created. Almost all the problems could be traced to our dissonance for unity. Unity in our lives could work mirackes for us.
This is a brief description of someone's face I saw on the bus to the office. The girl was not very good looking, but her face was somewhat different from anyone's I had seen till then.
You can get paid to write a book. It's easily possible to make a fast £10,000, or even a six figure amount. You could even make seven figures --- over a million pounds for twenty pages of text. It sounds incredible, but a fast seven figures is certainly possible if you have a HOT, hot idea or have had an experience that hundreds of thousands of people want to read about
Some people have criticised my article as an expression of my frustration and insecurity. This is really a way of saying to the world that I need someone to help me out of the tough situations of life. The article also finds mention of my daughter, Zeenat, who is a hypothetical abstract entity I have created as an escape from the tremors of ordinary life.
The article focusses on the theme that world unity education is the greatest need of the hour. It can change the flow of time, it can work miracles in our lives. We ought to strive for unity in all walks of life, for unity could make our lilves beautiful.
Peace is a prerequisite for justice fo prevail in the world. Things would be quite different if only we had justice in all the countries of the world. It is the absence of justice that creates terrorists, and if we want the world to be free from terrorism, we must ensure justice for one and all.
The most critical yea-nay time in a non-fiction book's existence is that final, objective reading before it is sent to print or to the last, pre-press proofing. That's where Gordon Burgett has reviewed them since 1980, and in this short article he offers 10 points where those books needing rejection or changes most often err. They provide an excellent review checklist for self-publishers or for new editors acting as the court of last print resort!
The Presbyterian Church USA has a hospital in Haiti and just recently that denomination announced: “Hôspital Sainte Croix (Holy Cross Hospital) and an affiliated nursing school in Léogâne, Haiti, have been approved to receive a $200,000 grant from Louisville-based Presbyterian Disaster Assistance (PDA).” In a specific way, denominations work together. The grant request was sent to PDA, and the much-needed funds were approved within two hours. The hospital and nursing school are ministries of
Author Philip Yaffe, who is now approaching the biblical three score and ten years of age, is still seeking answers to some fundamental questions, notable regarding what appear to be factual and moral discrepancies in the Bible. Could someone help him find the answers?
American writer Gertrude Stein spent most of her life in France. She wrote novels, plays, stories, libretti, and poems, but is best remembered for a line from a 1913 poem, "A rose is a rose is a rose." She was noted for her sometimes arcane observations formulated in "pithy prose". These are quotations that say more in one or two sentences than could be expressed in a thousand-word treatise. They are like pouring a liter of liquid into a half-liter bottle.
Over the past 40-plus years as a journalist and marketing communication consultant, I have frequently been told that I am an exceptionally good writer by teachers, friends, colleagues, and clients. But I wasn’t always a good writer; in fact, I used be a very bad one. So what happened to bring about this monumental change?
Simone Veil (born July 13, 1927), a survivor of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp, has served French Minister of Health and President of the European Parliament. She is a survivor of the Auschwitz concentration. She is particularly noted for his insightful observations formulated in "pithy prose". These are quotations that say more in one or two sentences than could be expressed in a thousand-word treatise. They are like pouring a liter of liquid into a half-liter bottle.
It hard to realize that the 50th anniversary of the election of John Fitzgerald Kennedy in November 1960 is rapidly approaching. It is equally hard to realize that the 50th anniversary of JFK's death in November 1963 is also now rapidly approaching. The recent election of Barack Obama has stirred strong memories of this short, dramatic period in world history.
Mark Twain famously said: "The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug." Of course he was absolutely right -- and partially wrong. In speaking, using exactly the right word is crucial. In speaking, it is important, but not crucial. Too much concern about finding the lightning rather than the lightning bug can be seriously detrimental.
Friedrich Schiller (1759 - 1805) was a leading German dramatist, poet, and essayist. His poem "Ode to Joy", which Beethoven set to music, is today the anthem of the 27-nation European Union. Schiller was particularly noted for his keen observations formulated in "pithy prose". These are quotations that say more in one or two sentences than could be expressed in a thousand-word treatise. They are like pouring a liter of liquid into a half-liter bottle.
Medical research may seem a rather dull, tedious occupation; however, some of the people who engage in it have extraordinary tales to tell. Dr. Wolf Szmuness, who helped develop the first hepatitis B vaccine, is an outstanding example. The story of how he came to New York City from Poland to carry out his life-saving work reads like high fiction.
0