Why Gandhi Stagemanaged His Own Death

WHY GANDHI STAGEMANAGED HIS OWN DEATH
Gandhi is regarded as being an anarchist and therefore it would have spoiled Gandhi’s reputation if he had become part of a government. And now, as the existence of God is proven, and as it is realised that God’s power given to the political state, true anarchism now has a real meaning, true anarchism has now come into its own so to speak.

And with my philosophy, true socialism has been liberated from phoney socialism. 

True anarchism does not seek to abolish the state but seeks freedom from the state, by the aspiration to attain independent power and therefore be free of the state.. The assertion by phoney anarchism that the state could be abolished was always in a sense puzzling, as the state obviously provides useful services for people, such as social welfare, education, hospitals etc, and it can be analysed that it is appropriate for the state as a system of administration to provide these services.

But true anarchism now has a real meaning, as the existence of God has been proven, and God has shared his power with the state and capitalism. 

A fundamental principle of true socialism has now been declared, that true socialism never desires to attain or seeks to attain the control of state power.

It would have been an inspiration for anarchist consciousness if Gandhi had of lived and had refused to be part of the government. No politician wants to refuse to be part of a state government with the apparatus of God’s state power. Therefore there is no inspiration for true anarchist consciousness among figures of stature such as politicians. It would have been an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness therefore to see Gandhi live and refuse to be part of the government.

Gandhi obviously thought about this idea and was thoughtful of whether he should refuse to be part of the government and leave that as an inspiration in history for true anarchist consciousness. But is it not true that Gandhi was not really a true anarchist but a statist pretending to be an anarchist, and that he didn’t want to be an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness by refusing to be part of the government.

You can imagine therefore that Gandhi decided that he didn’t want to refuse to be part of the government. But also, he realised that if he did become part of the government that would spoil his anarchist reputation. Therefore, Gandhi must have decided that he had to stagemanage his own death.

It could have been an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness. To be a true inspiration for true anarchist consciousness, Gandhi, in first of all making the effort of a peaceful initiative, would then have to have had, after the attainment of the Indian state, refused to have been part of a government that had a military army. 

Obviously the formation of the State of India would probably have to have had an military army, as is the nature of statism. It is possible that Gandhi, realising that it would be an inspiration that existed in history for true anarchist consciousness if he refused to be part of the government, could possibly have took a seat in parliament whilst refusing to be part of the government in charge of a military army. That could have been inspiring if he made the effort to do that, to refuse to be part of the government in accordance with peaceable anarchist ideology.

This would have been an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness and why not. After all, are there not enough politicians who willingly desire to be part of a state government, that has a military army . They have statist minds and they don't mind being part of a government. Why shouldn't there have been one such as Gandhi who in the interests of making an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness would have refused to have been part of a government that was in charge of a military army. Whilst logically, as it is the nature of statism, the State of India had to have had a military army I suppose, why shouldn't Gandhi have made the inspiration, as it would have existed as an inspiration in history for true anarchist consciousness. by refusing to be part of the government.

A question is, was Gandhi really a statist, and stage-managed his own death because he was aware of this idea, and didn't want to be an inspiration to true anarchist consciousness by refusing to be part of the government.

Obviously Gandhi had God's power, and obviously was not killed, obviously. Therefore, it must be so, that Gandhi agreed to the stagemanaging of his own death because he was a statist and didn't want to leave the inspiration for true anarchist consciousness. Whilst upon logical deduction, it must be so that Gandhi was a statist, but that hasn't been clarified, so I think this needs to be clarified. It would have been an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness if Gandhi had of lived and refused to be part of a government in appreciation of the need for the inspiration of true anarchist consciousness.

For anarchistsocialist consciousness to be free, it is also necessary for true anarchistsocialist consciousness to have its own power and the necessary amount of economic developments independently of the state and capitalism.

As I say that it would have been an inspiration for true anarchist consciousness to have known that Gandhi would have lived and in living refused to be part of the government because he appreciated the need for the inspiration of true anarchist consciousness, and therefore I say that this needs to be clarified.