Rick Neifeld is a Ph.D. (in Physics) patent attorney and managing partner and President of Neifeld IP Law, PC, whose URL is www.Neifeld.com. Neifeld IP Law is located near the USPTO, and it specializes in U.S. and international patent protect ion, licensing, advise, and counseling, and specialty matters at the USPTO. Rick is also a patent interference practitioner, former Chair of the Interference Committee of the AIPLA, and co-owner of the patent related services provided at www.PatentValuePredictor.com.
A Supplemental Note on the Medical Practitioner's Act
Bijel Dholakia sent in these questions via the PIUG Web Site Comments and Questions form:
1. What are some good patent search tips / techniques when searching for surgical processes or methods?
2. Are there any good training seminars / courses on how to search medical patents that you recommend? Who runs them?
Edward T. Mickelson, Ph.D., Patent Agent, replied stating in part "bearing in mind that such processes and methods are not patentable in Europe and are essentially meaningless in the US, as physicians are immune from infringement suits regarding surgical/medical processes and methods."
Ed was referring to the Medical Practitioner's Act codified at 35 USC 287(c)(4) (See the AIPA enacted in 1999). However, there are a LOT of twists to that statute. Medical practitioners licensed by a State or Territory of the U.S. are immune from liability of a patented method, as is their "related health care entity" such as the hospital in which they practice the patented method if they have a professional affiliation with the hospital.
However, amongst other things, that immunity from liability from patent infringement DOES NOT apply (1) to PATENTS issued from an application having an "effective filing date" prior to September 30, 1996 and (2) to ENTITIES engaged in "commercial development, manufacture, sale, importation,..." etc. where such ACTIVITIES are "directly related to commercial development, manufacture, sale, importation..." etc that are "regulated [by a variety of U.S. government agencies like the FDA].
What does this mean? Generally speaking, it means that old U.S. medical method patents are enforceable against physicians, and that all U.S. medical method patents are enforceable against manufacturers or regulated products. Generally, because there may be exceptions to the exceptions. Read 35 USC 287 in detail, and perhaps Gerry Mossinghoff's article in the JPTOS on the subject. My understanding is that Gerry was central to the drafting of this provision.
For those interested, I discussed the AIPA, and the meaning of "effective filing date" prior to September 30, 1996 in my article on the AIPA, now posted at http://www.neifeld.com/advart4.html
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A
Can I really sell my idea?
By: Russell Williams | 06/11/2009Yes; however, it is important to understand what you need to have in place to increase your odds of success. As you move your idea through the invention and patent process, your odds of success increase as your idea becomes more tangible and real.
Company Incorporation -The Procedure for Incorporating A Company in India
By: chaman | 28/10/2009Company incorporation is the act of making an official application to Companies House to create a company, which is well known the process of formation or process of incorporation. Full company name, the officers of the company and the principal address of the company on the register of companies held at Companies House are required to formalize the formation of a company.
Will Riches Come From Your Invention Submission
By: Oli Osorhan | 27/10/2009Overcome the barriers of making money from your revolutionary idea. The 4 barriers that stand in your way of obtaining a patent and selling it.
What is the difference between an idea and an invention and how do I properly document my idea?
By: Russell Williams | 26/10/2009The dictionary defines an invention as “a device, contrivance or process originated after study and experiment.” An idea is defined as “a formulated thought or opinion.”
What do I need to think about first in taking my idea to market?
By: Russell Williams | 21/10/2009Many inventors believe that they need to spend tens of thousands of dollars developing and manufacturing their ideas on their own to succeed, which is why you read so many stories about inventors who spent their life savings chasing an invention. While manufacturing is one option for certain inventors, it is not the most common option and certainly not the least risky.
Supreme Court of India adjudicates on dichotomy introduced for the first time by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, in the Patent Law
By: Sudhir Kumar | 20/10/2009Supreme Court of India in its civil appellate jurisdiction adjudicated on a Patent dispute titled J. Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd. versus Asst. Controller of Patents & Design. & Ors.The Supreme Court granted the leave and directed the High Court to adjudicate the matter in interest of justice for only two appeals of such kind were pending in the High Courts. The special circumstances arises because of dichotomy introduced for the first time by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005
How to get a Patent
By: NoroIP | 19/10/2009A quick guide to the patent process. Includes important terms. While fairly straightforward, the technical terms and legal aspects of filing a patent application can be confusing. I’ve attempted to outline the patent process step-by-step and include simple explanations of patent terminology you will encounter along the way. It should be noted that getting a Trademark or Copyright follows a very different process.
Tips for preparing a great patent resume
By: NoroIP | 19/10/2009While general rules for preparing a resume also apply to those in the IP field, there are some basic additions that can help you create a great patent resume.
The CAFC Decision in Tafas v. Doll (Fed. Cir. 3/20/2009)
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 19/07/2009 | PatentsOn March 20, 2009, a panel of the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") decided the USPTO's appeal of the District Court decision enjoining the USPTO's rules limiting applicants’ rights to file claims, continuations, and Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs). However, the panel was fractured, with a two panel member majority opinion (Judges Prost and Bryson), a concurrence (Judge Bryson), and a concurrence in part and dissent in part (Judge Radar).
The Decision on Rehearing in Amgen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGS) -
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 03/07/2009 | PatentsThe Decision on Rehearing in Amgen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGS) - Interference 105,613 - Teaching Points on Interference Practice
Can you Sue "the State" for Patent Infringement?
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/05/2007 | Intellectual PropertyReview of case law regarding protecting patents from infringement by the state.
Strategies for Preparing for a Patent Interference
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsPreparing for a successful patent interference and clues one winning.
Comments on United States Patent Assignment Information
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsThe text below is a copy of an email that I sent the Patent Interference User's Group (PIUG) on November 4, 2003, regarding United States Patent Assignment Information. My email was in response to a chain of emails discussing contents and accuracy of assignment information provided by the commercial database providers.
A Supplemental Note on the Medical Practitioner's Act
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patentsimmunity from liability from patent infringment
Patent Valuation From a Practical View Point, and Some Interesting Patent Value Statistics From the Patentvaluepredictor Model
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsA review of how to treat patents from a financial and tax reporting standpoint.