Remember Me
forgot your password?

Can you Use a Patent Application Filing in Order to Obtain a Foreign Filing License for "technical Data" ?

Can You Use a Patent Application Filing in Order to Obtain a Foreign Filing License for "technical data" ? - YES! - By Richard Neifeld, Ph.D., Patent Attorney, Neifeld IP Law, PC www.Neifeld.com
United States laws provide restrictions on exporting "technical data" outside the U.S. Obtaining a license to export that data through conventional channels may be time consuming and relatively expensive. A patent application can rapidly and inexpensively effect a license to export certain "technical data". U.S. patent laws and regulations provide for such a procedure, as follows. Unites States patent code section 35 USC 184 states as follows:
35 USC 184 - Filing of application in foreign country
Except when authorized by a license obtained from the Commissioner of Patents a person shall not file or cause or authorize to be filed in any foreign country prior to six months after filing in the United States an application for patent or for the registration of a utility model, industrial design, or model in respect of an invention made in this country. A license shall not be granted with respect to an invention subject to an order issued by the Commissioner of Patents pursuant to section 181 of this title without the concurrence of the head of the departments and the chief officers of the agencies who caused the order to be issued. The license may be granted retroactively where an application has been filed abroad through error and without deceptive intent and the application does not disclose an invention within the scope of section 181 of this title. The term "application" when used in this chapter includes applications and any modifications, amendments, or supplements thereto, or divisions thereof. The scope of a license shall permit subsequent modifications, amendments, and supplements containing additional subject matter if the application upon which the request for the license is based is not, or was not, required to be made available for inspection under section 181 of this title and if such modifications, amendments, and supplements do not change the general nature of the invention in a manner which would require such application to be made available for inspection under such section 181. In any case in which a license is not, or was not, required in order to file an application in any foreign country, such subsequent modifications, amendments, and supplements may be made, without a license, to the application filed in the foreign country if the United States application was not required to be made available for inspection under section 181 and if such modifications, amendments, and supplements do not, or did not, change the general nature of the invention in a manner which would require the United States application to have been made available for inspection under such section 181.
United States patent regulation 37 CFR 5.11 states as follows:
37 CFR 5.11 - License for filing in a foreign country an application on an invention made in the United States or for transmitting international application
(a) A license from the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks under 35 U.S.C. 184 is required before filing any application for patent including any modifications, amendments, or supplements thereto or divisions thereof or for the registration of a utility model, industrial design, or model, in a foreign patent office or any foreign patent agency or any international agency other than the United States Receiving Office, if the invention was made in the United States and:

1) An application on the invention has been filed in the United States less than six months prior to the date on which the application is to be filed, or
2) No application on the invention has been filed in the United States.
(b) The license from the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks referred to in paragraph (a) would also authorize the export of technical data abroad for purposes relating to the preparation, filing or possible filing and prosecution of a foreign patent application without separately complying with the regulations contained in 22 CFR parts 121 through 130 (International Traffic in Arms Regulations of the Department of State), 15 CFR part 779 (Regulations of the Office of Export Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce) and 10 CFR part 810 (Foreign Atomic Energy Programs of the Department of Energy). [49 FR 13461, Apr. 4, 1984; paras. (a) and (e), 56 FR 1924, Jan. 18, 1991, effective Feb. 19, 1991; paras. (b), (c), and (e)(3) revised, 62 FR 53131, Oct. 10, 1997, effective Dec. 1, 1997]
Thus, you can rapidly obtain a license for "technical data" by filing a U.S. patent application. That can be far more cost effective than by the alternative of complying with 22 CFR and 15 CFR. Moreover, it can be a lot faster.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will in most applications provide a foreign filing license, and will do so within a few weeks of the filing of the patent application. However, the USPTO also makes even more expedited service is available. While getting patent applications issued into patents may take years, getting a foreign filing license does not!

Richard A. Neifeld

Rick Neifeld is a Ph.D. (in Physics) patent attorney and managing partner and President of Neifeld IP Law, PC, whose URL is www.Neifeld.com. Neifeld IP Law is located near the USPTO, and it specializes in U.S. and international patent protect ion, licensing, advise, and counseling, and specialty matters at the USPTO. Rick is also a patent interference practitioner, former Chair of the Interference Committee of the AIPLA, and co-owner of the patent related services provided at www.PatentValuePredictor.com.

Rate this Article: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)
Print Email Re-Publish

Add new Comment



Captcha

  • Latest Patents Articles
  • More from Richard A. Neifeld

Trying to “Sell” Your Idea

By: Russell Williams | 30/12/2009
“Going to market” refers to the process of trying to “sell” your idea. Now, if your goal is to manufacture and market your invention on your own, then “going to market” means approaching retailers to sell your finished product to them or perhaps setting up a website where consumers can place their orders directly with you.

Biopiracy

By: Kripalini Nesakumar | 28/12/2009
Biopiracy or stealing of indigenous knowledge from biodiversity rich developing countries is an exploding issue in Asia. Often plants developed over centuries by the methods of traditional agriculture in the third world are used by first world corporations as the basis of inventions. This is worrisome for India since patents, which were supposed to prevent piracy, have now become legitimized process for thievery of their traditional knowledge making it an exclusive property of multinationals.

Paedophile register UK

By: Dominic Ericsson | 19/12/2009
Info on staying safe online and a new online UK paedophile register.

Marketing your Invention

By: Russell Williams | 11/12/2009
When inventors contact my company, InventionHome.com about Due Diligence I like to explain the concept with a simple example.

Patent Pending - How to Protect Your Ideas and Inventions With a Patent

By: Natalia Harrison | 09/12/2009
Understanding how to protect your ideas with a patent may sound difficult but the process is real easy. A patent is a license given to an investor like you for a particular period of time. It will keep your ideas safe.

Recommended Desktop Computers

By: anthony turner | 03/12/2009
Recommended Desktop Computers: With technology stirring up new innovations every day, computers have taken a large part in most peoples lives, both young and old. There are many options.

How to Patent and Idea

By: Russ Williams | 25/11/2009
Learning how to patent an idea is often the first step in the invention and patent process for new inventors. When inventors contact my company, InventionHome.com about the patent process and learning how to patent an idea, we believe they should start by learning about provisional patent applications vs. utility (non-provisional) patent applications.

The answers to all your prototype questions!

By: Russell Williams | 18/11/2009
In this article I will discuss the three most popular questions I receive when it comes to a prototype. What is a prototype? Should I develop a prototype? Reasons to develop a prototype.

The CAFC Decision in Tafas v. Doll (Fed. Cir. 3/20/2009)

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 19/07/2009 | Patents
On March 20, 2009, a panel of the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") decided the USPTO's appeal of the District Court decision enjoining the USPTO's rules limiting applicants’ rights to file claims, continuations, and Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs). However, the panel was fractured, with a two panel member majority opinion (Judges Prost and Bryson), a concurrence (Judge Bryson), and a concurrence in part and dissent in part (Judge Radar).

The Decision on Rehearing in Amgen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGS) -

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 03/07/2009 | Patents
The Decision on Rehearing in Amgen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGS) - Interference 105,613 - Teaching Points on Interference Practice

Can you Sue "the State" for Patent Infringement?

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/05/2007 | Intellectual Property
Review of case law regarding protecting patents from infringement by the state.

Strategies for Preparing for a Patent Interference

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patents
Preparing for a successful patent interference and clues one winning.

Comments on United States Patent Assignment Information

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patents
The text below is a copy of an email that I sent the Patent Interference User's Group (PIUG) on November 4, 2003, regarding United States Patent Assignment Information. My email was in response to a chain of emails discussing contents and accuracy of assignment information provided by the commercial database providers.

Electronic Notebooks and the Requirements to Prove Date of Invention in Patent Interferences

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patents
This paper contains an excerpt of an email I sent to the PIUG (Patent Information User's Group) email distribution list on November 30, 2003.

A Supplemental Note on the Medical Practitioner's Act

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patents
immunity from liability from patent infringment

Patent Valuation From a Practical View Point, and Some Interesting Patent Value Statistics From the Patentvaluepredictor Model

By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patents
A review of how to treat patents from a financial and tax reporting standpoint.

Submit Your Articles Free: Signup
Article Categories




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.28, 1, w3)