Richard Neifeld, Ph.D.
Patent Attorney
Email address: general @ neifeld.com
Education
J.D. The George Washington University Law School 1994 Ph.D. Rutgers University (Solid State Physics) 1985 B.S./B.A. University of Rochester (Physics and Mathematics)
(Cum Laude and Honors) 1980
Experience
Neifeld IP Law P.C. - 2002
Partner in the IP law firm of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, PC. - 1996
Patent Attorney - 1994
Patent Agent - 1992
Patent Technical Consultant - 1990
Staff Scientist for the U.S. Army's Laboratory Command - 1986
Post-doctoral Fellow, Rutgers University - 1985-1986
Former chair of the Interference Committee and current chair of the Services Subcommittee of the Interference Committee of the American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association (AIPLA). Member of the AIPLA, American Bar Association, Maryland Patent Lawyers Association, and the Patent Information Users Group. Extensive experience in "specialty matters" in the U.S. patent office, such as appeals, petitions, reexaminations, reissues, public protests, and extensive experience in foreign prosecution, and interferences and related litigation. Extensive experience in due diligence work, including investigations, database searching, and opinions.
Admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Virginia State Courts, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
Widely published in IP law publications, frequent lecturer to patent attorneys on patent law topics, and an active member of the patent bar associations. Founder and moderator for the popular "patentinterference" group on the groups.yahoo.com/group/patentinterference web site, which is a forum for general information on patent law and practice with a focus on patent interference issues.
Co-founder of the www.PatentValuePredictor.com automated patent valuation service, co-inventor of the underlying macro-economic model for valuing patents, and programmer of some of the code powering the automated valuations.
Five years of scientific research in applied physics areas of electro-optics, III-V materials, microwaves, vacuum deposition technology, superconductors, and electronics directed towards the U.S. Army's electronics, communication, and signal processing needs.
"Intellectual Property (IP) 101"
IP includes patents, trademarks, and copyrights. A patent provides an exclusive right to an invention. A trademark provides an exclusive right to an indication of source of a product. A copyright provides an exclusive right to an original work. A service mark provides an exclusive right to a service or origin of a service.
United States copyrights accrue automatically, but a work must be registered with the United States Copyright Office to perfect the federal copyright. Trademark rights can also accrue without a federal registration, but those rights are weaker, and a federal registration is preferred in almost all situations.
United States patents and trademarks are obtained by filing an application in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). An examiner in the USPTO examines the application for compliance with all statutory requirements. The USPTO issues complying applications and rejects non-complying applications. Often, a non-complying application can be amended, thereby placing it in condition for allowance. It is helpful to discuss possible amendments with the examiner in charge of the application prior to filing an amendment. Discussions with the examiner on how best to amend an application increase the chance that the amendment will result in allowance.
Trademarks and service marks identify your business to the purchaser of your product or service. Your mark allows a consumer to come back to you if he or she likes what you provide. If you have a trademark right, using your trademark prevents someone else from using a similar mark that is likely to confuse the public into buying goods from them instead of you.
Patents provide a limited monopoly on your company’s product or process. Monopoly translates into high profit margins due to exclusion of competition. Patents can be obtained on any invention that complies with the statutory requirements, which are that the invention is useful, novel, and non-obvious. The prevailing case law allows patents on just about anything, for example, it allows patents on computer implemented methods of calculating useful results, and on computer implemented methods of doing business.
Obtaining United States patents and trademark rights is expensive, primarily due to the amount of high hourly rate attorney time required to prepare an application and guide it through the USPTO. For patents, part of that cost can be deferred by initially filing a relatively simple provisional patent application. The filing date of a provisional application is prima facie (evidence legally sufficient to establish a fact unless subsequently disproved by additional evidence) proof of the date of invention. A provisional patent application protects for one year the right to pursue patent protection on the novel aspects of a product or process at a very low cost. However, provisional applications do not issue into patents. They simply preserve the filing date for an invention for up to one year. Within one year of the filing date of the provisional application, it must be followed by filing a more formal US application and any foreign applications in foreign countries in which protection is sought. If the formal applications are not filed, the benefit of the early filing date of the provisional application is lost.
Who Owns Your Invention?
Who owns your invention? Who owns your employee’s invention? Invention ownership disputes occur all too frequently. However, invention ownership disputes are easily avoidable with the proper foresight and knowledge.
Our legal system presumes that the inventor is the owner of the exclusive rights in his or her invention. How then, does someone other than the inventor obtain the rights to the inventor’s invention? The answer to that question is by an assignment. The assignment can be an express assignment, which is typically a written document evidencing a contract between the inventor and the assignee in which the inventor sells the rights to the invention to the assignee. However, that type of assignment is not what leads to ownership disputes. Ownership disputes occur when there is no express assignment and both the inventor and his or her employer think that they own the invention. This is because the presumption that the inventor owns the invention is incorrect in certain situations, even without an express assignment.
An employer of one who is "hired to invent" owns the rights to the inventor’s inventions. The Supreme Court came to that conclusion in the Standard Parts Co. v. Peck case in 1924. However, that is the extreme case, since the vast majority of employees are not employed to invent. What about an employee employed to design or construct, such as an engineer? An employee employed in a field of endeavor in order to design or construct is not equivalent to an employee employed for the purpose of invention. That was the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Dubilier Condenser Corp. in 1933. However, that conclusion leaves open the question of who owns the invention made by the engineer. The outcome in each ownership case depends on the relationship between the employee, the employer, and the circumstances of the invention.
Even if it turns out that the employee owns his or her invention, if the employee used the employer’s materials or equipment during working hours to make the invention, the law grants the employer a nonexclusive license to the invention. That has been the law ever since the Supreme Court Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke case in 1893.
It should be apparent that the best way to avoid an ownership dispute is to reduce to a written contract between the employee and the employer who owns the rights to any inventions made by the employee, and that agreement should be defined as early as possible in the employee employer relationship.
Substantial information on patents and trademarks is provided at the USPTO’s website at http://www.uspto.gov.
Copyright Richard A. Neifeld, President, Neifeld IP Law, PC
If you have any other questions or need further information please feel free to contact us via email at http://www.neifeld.com.
- Related Articles
- Related Q&A
- patent trademark copyright
- copyright legislation
- copyright cases
- An Orange County, Fullerton and Riverside California Trademark Lawyer’s Humorous Take on Trademark Infringement
- Trademark for the picture of deity: Serious prejudice to religious freedom
- How to Register a Trademark - Use a Lawyer to Defend Your Trademark or Copyright
- Trademarks And Copyrights And His Orchestra
- How Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights can increase the value of your business




Patent Attorneys: What They Do
By: Marlon Dirk | 06/07/2009Patent attorneys act as legal counselors of companies. When an inventor submits his invention, the patent attorney gets to start his work. The patent attorney reviews the invention and decides whether it is fit to be patented or not. It is his responsibility to evaluate if the invention is useful, unique, and relevant. Then based on his evaluation, he recommends to the client whether or not to submit a patent application for the invention.
The Decision on Rehearing in Amgen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGS) -
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 03/07/2009The Decision on Rehearing in Amgen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGS) - Interference 105,613 - Teaching Points on Interference Practice
Drug Safety: What Is it Worth?
By: PBR | 24/06/2009What country is so ruled by its desire for profits over people that it would sanction or condone the manufacture and distribution of unsafe pharmaceuticals to its own citizens, or by dumping them upon unsuspecting physicians, hospitals, and citizens of other nations? Under the category of global enterprise, nothing is more dangerous than to have too little protectionism and ineffective negotiations with governments and their medical management associations and regulatory agencies.
PATENT FILING REQUIREMENTS IN INDIA
By: Sudhir Kumar | 16/06/2009To minimize the cost of Patent filing and prosecution in India, there are number of things an attorney should take in to account. In the event you are filing a PCT national phase application, provide your associate in India following information:
How to obtain patent in India?
By: Senthil Kumar | 15/06/2009If you are an inventor or budding inventor, you might be having lot of questions in your mind before marketing your invention, such as how to obtain patent for my invention? Is my invention patentable? Can I file patent by myself? etc. There are certain basic guidelines are already known to the patent practitioners to help the inventors.
Finding and Choosing a Right Attorney
By: Aplgeal | 11/06/2009Finding and Choosing an Right Attorney - Before you decide which attorney you are going to hire, you might want to contact several of those that are in your area to help you choose one that can give you the affordable services that are best for you.
All About Candles
By: Fred Wild | 22/05/2009Candles used to be a primary light source many years ago, now they are used primarily for visual and fragrant value in your home. Candles are also used in many religions. For candle resources, visit
Can you Sue "the State" for Patent Infringement?
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/05/2007 | Intellectual PropertyReview of case law regarding protecting patents from infringement by the state.
Strategies for Preparing for a Patent Interference
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsPreparing for a successful patent interference and clues one winning.
Comments on United States Patent Assignment Information
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsThe text below is a copy of an email that I sent the Patent Interference User's Group (PIUG) on November 4, 2003, regarding United States Patent Assignment Information. My email was in response to a chain of emails discussing contents and accuracy of assignment information provided by the commercial database providers.
Electronic Notebooks and the Requirements to Prove Date of Invention in Patent Interferences
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsThis paper contains an excerpt of an email I sent to the PIUG (Patent Information User's Group) email distribution list on November 30, 2003.
A Supplemental Note on the Medical Practitioner's Act
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | Patentsimmunity from liability from patent infringment
Patent Valuation From a Practical View Point, and Some Interesting Patent Value Statistics From the Patentvaluepredictor Model
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsA review of how to treat patents from a financial and tax reporting standpoint.
What Any Decision Maker Needs to Know About Patent Protection
By: Richard A. Neifeld | 24/04/2007 | PatentsThis paper explains the basic information a decision maker needs to know regarding patents. There are certain concepts the understanding of which is a prerequisite for this topic.