No-win-no-fee Must be Simpler

<h1>No-win-no-fee Must be Simpler</h1>Author: <a title="Saurav Dutt" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/saurav-dutt/57763.htm">Saurav Dutt</a> No-win-no fee arrangements were originally created to provide transparency and easier access for justice for claimants. Its primary aim was to play a central role in ensuring this access for genuine claims. For many consumers, it is the main way to right a perceived wrong and balance the scales of justice. In the opinion of the government-and the many critics of the system-the name no longer conjures up thoughts of justice and transparency, but confusions, unrealistic hopes of compensation and abuse. It is for these very reasons that Civil Justice Minister David Lammy has published proposals to change the no-win-no-fee system. The consultation paper is entitled ‘Making simple CFA’s a reality’ and its proposals aim to make conditional fee agreements more transparent and provide a better deal for consumers, solicitors and defendants. One of Lammy’s major concerns is that arrangements can sometimes be too complex and opaque, and that this may inadvertently lead consumers to believe that there is absolutely no cost whatever to them to incur, especially if they win a claim. This ‘read the small print’ feature of the arrangements should be eradicated and the proposals look to help consumers understand exactly where they stand regarding what kind of compensation they can look to receive if they win a claim, and how that sum is distributed at the final stage. Lammy has also stated that new draft regulations will be submitted for debate after looking at responses to last year’s consultation paper. For instance, one of the proposals is to  remove as far as possible the detailed client care and costs information requirements from the current regulations so that the main way to regulate solicitors' conduct and client care for CFAs, is through the Law Society's practice rules and supporting guidance. Indeed, working with the Law Society is seen as the most ideal way to simplify the regime. One of the revised aims is to continue to work with and support the Law Society in its development of a revised costs information guide and new model CFA agreements to support the main types of CFA to be used under the proposed new simplified regime. The overall aim of this simplification is to ensure that consumers receive more protection. By changing client care guidance and sanctioning non compliance, this sends a message out to solicitors to improve their integrity and competence in the legal profession.About the Author: Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/no-win-no-fee.aspx" title="No Win No Fee">No Win No Fee</a>, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/nowinnofee-must-be-simpler-488664.html" title="No-win-no-fee Must be Simpler">No-win-no-fee Must be Simpler</a>

No-win-no fee arrangements were originally created to provide transparency and easier access for justice for claimants. Its primary aim was to play a central role in ensuring this access for genuine claims. For many consumers, it is the main way to right a perceived wrong and balance the scales of justice.

In the opinion of the government-and the many critics of the system-the name no longer conjures up thoughts of justice and transparency, but confusions, unrealistic hopes of compensation and abuse.

It is for these very reasons that Civil Justice Minister David Lammy has published proposals to change the no-win-no-fee system. The consultation paper is entitled ‘Making simple CFA’s a reality’ and its proposals aim to make conditional fee agreements more transparent and provide a better deal for consumers, solicitors and defendants.

One of Lammy’s major concerns is that arrangements can sometimes be too complex and opaque, and that this may inadvertently lead consumers to believe that there is absolutely no cost whatever to them to incur, especially if they win a claim. This ‘read the small print’ feature of the arrangements should be eradicated and the proposals look to help consumers understand exactly where they stand regarding what kind of compensation they can look to receive if they win a claim, and how that sum is distributed at the final stage.

Lammy has also stated that new draft regulations will be submitted for debate after looking at responses to last year’s consultation paper. For instance, one of the proposals is to remove as far as possible the detailed client care and costs information requirements from the current regulations so that the main way to regulate solicitors' conduct and client care for CFAs, is through the Law Society's practice rules and supporting guidance.

Indeed, working with the Law Society is seen as the most ideal way to simplify the regime. One of the revised aims is to continue to work with and support the Law Society in its development of a revised costs information guide and new model CFA agreements to support the main types of CFA to be used under the proposed new simplified regime.

The overall aim of this simplification is to ensure that consumers receive more protection. By changing client care guidance and sanctioning non compliance, this sends a message out to solicitors to improve their integrity and competence in the legal profession.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/nowinnofee-must-be-simpler-488664.html

Article Tags: No Win No Fee, Claims, Claimants

Related Articles
Related Q&A

Latest Personal Injury Articles
More from Saurav Dutt

Sports Injuries

By: Erich Shrefler | 08/12/2009
Some sports injuries result from accidents while others are due to poor conditioning, improper training or faulty equipment. Others occur because of neglect or misleading information provided by their athletic support staff. For those who suffer serious or permanent damage from an athletic injury, their quality of life can change dramatically.

Who is Entitled to Workers Compensation Benefits?

By: Erich Shrefler | 08/12/2009
Almost all employees are covered by Workers’ Compensation, but having a job does not necessarily mean that you are an employee. Independent contractors, for instance, are not employees. Additionally, your employer may be exempt from the Workers’ Compensation Act if he or she does not regularly employee at least three people.

Defective/Dangerous Drugs

By: Erich Shrefler | 08/12/2009
It can be very difficult to tell the difference between a defective drug case which is a product liability case and a medication error case which is usually a medical malpractice case. In some types of defective drug lawsuits you will have both a product liability case against the drug maker and a malpractice case against the doctor, hospital, or health care provider that was responsible.

Know Just How to Find the Top Miami Personal Injury Lawyer

By: Mark Ferrer | 08/12/2009
The Miami personal injury lawyer can definitely help you seek compensation and justice from the negligence you’ve fallen victim for. But finding the right legal representation can be frustrating if you don’t know the qualifications that can consider one a top personal injury lawyer. So to make it easier for you to find the attorney you need for your case, here are some considerations that you can use to set your qualifications.

Compensation Claims – For the 'Do It Yourself' People

By: Mrunmai | 08/12/2009
It could be because of all those lawyer jokes doing the round of text messages and emails. It could also be the horror stories people like to repeat when it comes to their experiences with lawyers. Or it could be the movies. For whatever reason, many people dislike lawyers.

Airbag Accidents

By: Erich Shrefler | 08/12/2009
Airbag injuries can be confusing for victims because the injury was caused by something designed to protect them. It can also be hard to separate the effects of the accident itself and the results of airbag deployment.

Tory Leader’s pledge may hurt people most in need of making compensation claims

By: Sean Butcher | 08/12/2009
Conservative leader David Cameron has made the headlines by declaring he will crack down on a ‘compensation culture’ that he believes is gripping the nation.

Hire a personal injury attorney for getting justice and compensation you deserve

By: Adolphpaul | 08/12/2009
Those injured in an accident for no fault of theirs are entitled to compensation by law. But getting justice and fair compensation is not an easy task without availing valuable legal assistance. Under the New York Personal Injury Law, if you are injured due to negligence of some individual or authority, you can file a compensation claim. There are different types of compensation claims including those for personal injury caused due to medical negligence.

Whiplash not a Bogus Injury

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With accusations of a ‘compensation culture’ and ‘ambulance chasers’ being banded around liberally, people can often lose sight of the fact that whiplash injuries are a whole lot more serious than they are given credit for. Whiplash claims are often perceived to be the result of overactive imaginations by people who have suffered ‘just’ a small neck injury.

To Claim or not to Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After suffering an injury because of an accident that is not your fault, instinct often tells us that we should seek redress immediately, and why not. However the road to battling an insurance company to get some kind of compensation all the way to the courtroom can often be a painful and disappointing venture. The litigation process can really eat up a lot of your time, money and effort. Therefore, it’s sometimes better to settle for less prior to trial than to go through the whole process and

The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The Nature of No-win-no-fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With constant criticisms of the no-win-no-fee system prevalent in almost every news story associated with the scheme, this article aims to underline and explain the essential features and benefits that were originally aimed to help people gain easier access to justice. Despite accusations of the scheme being used for purposes for which it was not created, various incidental features of it were introduced for a good reason and still help many clients in the UK.

The Advantage of No Win No Fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
No win no fee claims are an essential means of achieving access to justice. After an accident, no win no fee provides an easy way to litigate for compensation, thus keeping companies accountable as well as receive some mitigation for the negative circumstances that have been thrust on you.

Taking the Initiative at Work

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
All too often organisations only feel the need to take proactive intervention to reduce accidents at work when the fear of censure or criticism from the powers that be are looming. To that end, too many companies feel compelled to do something when the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) steps in to investigate.

Streamlining the Claims Process

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance.

Smoothening the Road to a Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 18/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After an accident, seeking legal redress often seems a necessary evil. Makin a personal injury claim is the natural step but the myriad of legal complications can often seem like a herculean task if you’re still trying to recover from the accident in question. There are ways to make the whole process as smooth as possible and ensure that getting reimbursed for the physical or psychological harm suffered is not as time consuming and costly as it seems.