Personal Injury Claims Need Overhaul

<h1>Personal Injury Claims Need Overhaul</h1>Author: <a title="Saurav Dutt" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/saurav-dutt/57763.htm">Saurav Dutt</a> The future of personal injury litigation and its effect of personal injury solicitors hang in the balance after The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has continued to voice its concerns over expediting a much needed overhaul of the system. The ABI published a consultation paper over a year ago and are still anxiously awaiting a substantive response from the Ministry of Justice. The ABI suggested imposing a system of fixed fees, giving insurers the job of investigating cases and increasing the limit on fast track cases from £15,000 to £25,000. The ABI is the trade association for Britain’s insurance industry. Its member companies provide over 90% of the insurance business in the UK. It represents insurance companies to the Government, and to the regulatory and other agencies, and is a powerful voice on public policy and financial services issues. ABI member companies hold up to a sixth of all investments traded on the London Stock Exchange, on behalf of millions of pensioners and savers. The research in the consultation paper contended that injury claims following a motor accident took on average two years to settle, with three years on average for workplace claims. This time span was deemed unacceptable and to help temper such problems, the ABI suggested that insurers should be able to investigate claims in the first instance, so that where they admitted liability, they could move straight away to negotiating settlement. Personal injury solicitors, in particular, were condemned for paying high referral fees to claims management companies. The report recommended that reducing legal costs was the key to delivering a fairer and more efficient system. Furthermore, it was suggested  by the ABI that it has become an increasingly worrying trend that a person who has been injured goes to a lawyer who does a vast amount of unnecessary research, before putting the claim anywhere near the insurer thus increasing the time gap. Critics of the ABI have suggested that the recommendations are simply a cost cutting exercise and will have no considerable effect Although the ABI has been impatient for news from the government as per promised changes, the government has already drawn up plans to improve the process and the ABI is keen to see them implemented, so that claims can be settled swiftly. Under the new proposals, personal injury solicitors would have five days after being contacted by a claimant in which to notify insurers of a potential claim. Insurers would have 15 days in the case of a motor claim, and 30 days for a workplace or public liability claim, to decide whether or not they are going to settle.About the Author: Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/" title="Personal Injury Claims">Personal Injury Claims</a> and other legal articles.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/personal-injury-claims-need-overhaul-446987.html" title="Personal Injury Claims Need Overhaul">Personal Injury Claims Need Overhaul</a>

The future of personal injury litigation and its effect of personal injury solicitors hang in the balance after The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has continued to voice its concerns over expediting a much needed overhaul of the system.

The ABI published a consultation paper over a year ago and are still anxiously awaiting a substantive response from the Ministry of Justice. The ABI suggested imposing a system of fixed fees, giving insurers the job of investigating cases and increasing the limit on fast track cases from £15,000 to £25,000.

The ABI is the trade association for Britain’s insurance industry. Its member companies provide over 90% of the insurance business in the UK. It represents insurance companies to the Government, and to the regulatory and other agencies, and is a powerful voice on public policy and financial services issues. ABI member companies hold up to a sixth of all investments traded on the London Stock Exchange, on behalf of millions of pensioners and savers.

The research in the consultation paper contended that injury claims following a motor accident took on average two years to settle, with three years on average for workplace claims. This time span was deemed unacceptable and to help temper such problems, the ABI suggested that insurers should be able to investigate claims in the first instance, so that where they admitted liability, they could move straight away to negotiating settlement.

Personal injury solicitors, in particular, were condemned for paying high referral fees to claims management companies. The report recommended that reducing legal costs was the key to delivering a fairer and more efficient system.

Furthermore, it was suggested by the ABI that it has become an increasingly worrying trend that a person who has been injured goes to a lawyer who does a vast amount of unnecessary research, before putting the claim anywhere near the insurer thus increasing the time gap.

Critics of the ABI have suggested that the recommendations are simply a cost cutting exercise and will have no considerable effect

Although the ABI has been impatient for news from the government as per promised changes, the government has already drawn up plans to improve the process and the ABI is keen to see them implemented, so that claims can be settled swiftly.

Under the new proposals, personal injury solicitors would have five days after being contacted by a claimant in which to notify insurers of a potential claim.

Insurers would have 15 days in the case of a motor claim, and 30 days for a workplace or public liability claim, to decide whether or not they are going to settle.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/personal-injury-claims-need-overhaul-446987.html

Article Tags: Solicitors, Personal Injury, Claims

Related Articles
Related Q&A

Latest Personal Injury Articles
More from Saurav Dutt

New headrest that could prevent whiplash injuries

By: catherine | 31/12/2009
Free Accident claims advice from Personal injury lawyers, we Guarantee 100% Compensation to all clients under a no win no fee claim.

Multi Car Accident Near Santa Paula, California Leaves Twelve Injured

By: Joel Mclaughlin | 31/12/2009
A serious multi-car accident took place on highway 126 near Santa Paula recently which was thought to be caused by unsafe speeds and reckless driving. Alex Rojas, a Santa Clarita resident, apparently lost control of the SUV he was driving as he attempted to pass a vehicle ahead of him.

Florida Lawyer Answers Auto Accident Question

By: Joseph M. Maus | 30/12/2009
Q & A - An expert answer by a Florida auto accident lawyer.

A Review of LGN Prosperity

By: Jeannette Nixon | 30/12/2009
LGN Prosperity is changing the way that people build businesses. Before LGN anyone wishing to start a business online would have to invest hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars getting a business together...

Deaths From Tasers: Some Taser Wrongful Death Lawsuits

By: Danon law | 30/12/2009
Deaths from tasers: High, belligerent and unruly. The police use the taser to get the situation under control and...

It Happened Again! Aging Trucker in Deadly Accident in Michigan When Are We Going to Insist on Mandatory Retirement at Age 65? We Do For Pilots

By: Terry Cochran | 30/12/2009
If we are concerned about trucking accident fatalities we should give serious consideration to a mandatory retirement age for truckers. Airline pilots and others have mandatory retirement requirements; why not truckers also?

7 Reasons To File A Car Accident Related Personal Injury Lawsuit

By: Euan McConnell | 30/12/2009
If you are curious if this applies to you, here are seven reasons to file a car accident related personal injury lawsuit.

3 Common Types Of Premises Injury Lawsuits

By: Euan McConnell | 30/12/2009
For more information on premise injury lawsuits, here are 3 common types.

Whiplash not a Bogus Injury

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With accusations of a ‘compensation culture’ and ‘ambulance chasers’ being banded around liberally, people can often lose sight of the fact that whiplash injuries are a whole lot more serious than they are given credit for. Whiplash claims are often perceived to be the result of overactive imaginations by people who have suffered ‘just’ a small neck injury.

To Claim or not to Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After suffering an injury because of an accident that is not your fault, instinct often tells us that we should seek redress immediately, and why not. However the road to battling an insurance company to get some kind of compensation all the way to the courtroom can often be a painful and disappointing venture. The litigation process can really eat up a lot of your time, money and effort. Therefore, it’s sometimes better to settle for less prior to trial than to go through the whole process and

The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The Nature of No-win-no-fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With constant criticisms of the no-win-no-fee system prevalent in almost every news story associated with the scheme, this article aims to underline and explain the essential features and benefits that were originally aimed to help people gain easier access to justice. Despite accusations of the scheme being used for purposes for which it was not created, various incidental features of it were introduced for a good reason and still help many clients in the UK.

The Advantage of No Win No Fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
No win no fee claims are an essential means of achieving access to justice. After an accident, no win no fee provides an easy way to litigate for compensation, thus keeping companies accountable as well as receive some mitigation for the negative circumstances that have been thrust on you.

Taking the Initiative at Work

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
All too often organisations only feel the need to take proactive intervention to reduce accidents at work when the fear of censure or criticism from the powers that be are looming. To that end, too many companies feel compelled to do something when the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) steps in to investigate.

Streamlining the Claims Process

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance.

Smoothening the Road to a Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 18/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After an accident, seeking legal redress often seems a necessary evil. Makin a personal injury claim is the natural step but the myriad of legal complications can often seem like a herculean task if you’re still trying to recover from the accident in question. There are ways to make the whole process as smooth as possible and ensure that getting reimbursed for the physical or psychological harm suffered is not as time consuming and costly as it seems.