Streamlining the Claims Process

<h1>Streamlining the Claims Process</h1>Author: <a title="Saurav Dutt" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/saurav-dutt/57763.htm">Saurav Dutt</a> In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance. The consultation paper sets out proposals for a system that will provide fair compensation in a more efficient and cost-effective way by providing that, for example, the defendant/insurer will have a set time period in which to respond, during which the claimant/lawyer will not carry out any further work unless essential. Other recommendations are that there will be set time periods for making offers and reaching settlement, and that Success fees and “After the Event” insurance should be reduced to reflect the actual amount of work and risk involved in bringing a claim. Some insurance organisations, like Accenture, believe that although the current proposals are a good start there are still additional areas that need to be debated. For example, there is the question as to how insurers will achieve the procedural improvements required to meet the new timeframes and whether existing claims management, workflow and management information systems deal with the new process requirements and timeframes. These reforms were originally projected to take place in first quarter of 2008. Although that deadline has since passed, an indication of the exact changes will no doubt be revealed come the end of the year. In the meantime, insurers need to start their preparation now and so give themselves an opportunity to overtake their competition by planning for the proposed changes before to their introduction, and to use the momentum to give a boost to the claims operation on the path toward achieving high performance. For instance, Allianz Insurance is piloting changes to its handling of personal injury claims in anticipation of reforms by the Ministry of Justice. These  changes, include fast tracking of motor and casualty claims to £25,000, and rapid liability investigations to meet the claims deadlines initially set up in the MoJ’s consultation paper last year. The firm has encouraged brokers and policyholders to help insurers reduce personal injury costs further by improving the average time to report new losses, stressing the importance for insurers to receive quick notification and to implement inquiries and measures as soon as possible after the occurrence of an accident.About the Author: Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/personal-injury.aspx" title="Personal Injury">Personal Injury</a> and other legal articles.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/streamlining-the-claims-process-489922.html" title="Streamlining the Claims Process">Streamlining the Claims Process</a>

In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance.

The consultation paper sets out proposals for a system that will provide fair compensation in a more efficient and cost-effective way by providing that, for example, the defendant/insurer will have a set time period in which to respond, during which the claimant/lawyer will not carry out any further work unless essential. Other recommendations are that there will be set time periods for making offers and reaching settlement, and that Success fees and “After the Event” insurance should be reduced to reflect the actual amount of work and risk involved in bringing a claim.

Some insurance organisations, like Accenture, believe that although the current proposals are a good start there are still additional areas that need to be debated. For example, there is the question as to how insurers will achieve the procedural improvements required to meet the new timeframes and whether existing claims management, workflow and management information systems deal with the new process requirements and timeframes.

These reforms were originally projected to take place in first quarter of 2008. Although that deadline has since passed, an indication of the exact changes will no doubt be revealed come the end of the year. In the meantime, insurers need to start their preparation now and so give themselves an opportunity to overtake their competition by planning for the proposed changes before to their introduction, and to use the momentum to give a boost to the claims operation on the path toward achieving high performance.

For instance, Allianz Insurance is piloting changes to its handling of personal injury claims in anticipation of reforms by the Ministry of Justice. These changes, include fast tracking of motor and casualty claims to £25,000, and rapid liability investigations to meet the claims deadlines initially set up in the MoJ’s consultation paper last year.

The firm has encouraged brokers and policyholders to help insurers reduce personal injury costs further by improving the average time to report new losses, stressing the importance for insurers to receive quick notification and to implement inquiries and measures as soon as possible after the occurrence of an accident.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury and other legal articles.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/streamlining-the-claims-process-489922.html

Article Tags: Solicitors, Personal Injury, Claims

Related Articles
Related Q&A

Latest Personal Injury Articles
More from Saurav Dutt

Nashville Truck Laws

By: Erich Shrefler | 24/11/2009
A number of these truck accidents are undoubtedly just unfortunate accidents. However, too many are preventable, and occur because of negligence, impaired driving, fatigue, or violation of regulations specific to commercial vehicles. These violations could be the fault of the trucking company or the driver himself.

Gardasil

By: Erich Shrefler | 24/11/2009
Chronic human papillomavirus infection is associated with the development of cervical cancer and Gardasil was the first vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer.

Compensation In Plastic Surgery

By: Ayesha Salim | 24/11/2009
Plastic surgery is a very private and invasive procedure, one that is not taken flippantly by most. In addition to costing a lot of money, it can be a perilous procedure and can lead to unwanted results if not performed correctly.

Procedures Involving Failed Vasectomy and Failed Sterilisation

By: Ayesha Salim | 24/11/2009
Many folks in the UK are undergoing vasectomy or sterilisation measures as a way of avoiding pregnancy. There may be other reasons implicated, however it all depends on those concerned.

Truck Accidents: Garbage Trucks

By: Erich Shrefler | 24/11/2009
Accidents involving garbage trucks or “trash trucks” are not always at the top of our minds, because they do not happen as frequently as other types of truck accidents in the U.S. But that does not make these types of accidents any less dangerous for the general public.

Truck Accidents: Lowboy Trucks

By: Erich Shrefler | 24/11/2009
Tractor-trailer accidents can be some of the most serious accidents on U.S. highways, simply due to the massive size and weight of these types of vehicles. Lowboy trucks, in particular, pose several specific safety concerns.

Liability in a Car Accident when a Car is Defective

By: Erich Shrefler | 23/11/2009
Dangerous automobiles can cause unnecessary injury in a car accident by failing to operate as designed, or by being poorly designed. Hundreds of accidents involving defective safety restraints and airbags that fail to deploy result in unnecessary injuries every year.

Wrongful Death Claims – A Lawsuit By Another Name

By: Thomas Ajava | 23/11/2009
The concept of wrongful death is unique in the law because it is what is known as a bootstrap law. While someone may file a wrongful death lawsuit, the legal claims in that lawsuit are actually based on other legal theories that exist regardless of whether a person died or not.

Whiplash not a Bogus Injury

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With accusations of a ‘compensation culture’ and ‘ambulance chasers’ being banded around liberally, people can often lose sight of the fact that whiplash injuries are a whole lot more serious than they are given credit for. Whiplash claims are often perceived to be the result of overactive imaginations by people who have suffered ‘just’ a small neck injury.

To Claim or not to Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After suffering an injury because of an accident that is not your fault, instinct often tells us that we should seek redress immediately, and why not. However the road to battling an insurance company to get some kind of compensation all the way to the courtroom can often be a painful and disappointing venture. The litigation process can really eat up a lot of your time, money and effort. Therefore, it’s sometimes better to settle for less prior to trial than to go through the whole process and

The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The Nature of No-win-no-fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With constant criticisms of the no-win-no-fee system prevalent in almost every news story associated with the scheme, this article aims to underline and explain the essential features and benefits that were originally aimed to help people gain easier access to justice. Despite accusations of the scheme being used for purposes for which it was not created, various incidental features of it were introduced for a good reason and still help many clients in the UK.

The Advantage of No Win No Fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
No win no fee claims are an essential means of achieving access to justice. After an accident, no win no fee provides an easy way to litigate for compensation, thus keeping companies accountable as well as receive some mitigation for the negative circumstances that have been thrust on you.

Taking the Initiative at Work

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
All too often organisations only feel the need to take proactive intervention to reduce accidents at work when the fear of censure or criticism from the powers that be are looming. To that end, too many companies feel compelled to do something when the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) steps in to investigate.

Streamlining the Claims Process

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance.

Smoothening the Road to a Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 18/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After an accident, seeking legal redress often seems a necessary evil. Makin a personal injury claim is the natural step but the myriad of legal complications can often seem like a herculean task if you’re still trying to recover from the accident in question. There are ways to make the whole process as smooth as possible and ensure that getting reimbursed for the physical or psychological harm suffered is not as time consuming and costly as it seems.