The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

<h1>The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims</h1>Author: <a title="Saurav Dutt" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/saurav-dutt/57763.htm">Saurav Dutt</a> The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago.  This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims. The main complaint about Cherie Blair using a conditional fee agreement in her specific case is that, as a relatively wealthy individual, she is in effect abusing the CFA system in order to force the magazine or newspaper into settling claims. Defamation/libel by its nature has always had the reputation of a tort that has been left to claimants who are wealthy as the cases often run into millions. The introduction of 'no win, no fee' agreements, or conditional fee agreements (CFAs), under the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 enabled those who would otherwise be unable to fund the substantial costs involved in defamation claims to bring an action. In cases where a wealthy individual (especially a celebrity) takes a media defendant to court, these media defendants find themselves paying up to settle the claim rather than losing what could be a very large amount at trial. The criticism is that they are fenced into paying out because of this even when the claim against them may be frivolous. Defamation essentially takes places where a false statement is made about a person (or a company) that damages their reputation. The statement can be either in a permanent form (libel) or a transient form (slander). A company also has a reputation and contrary to popular belief can also be defamed. Another problem that often comes to fruition in defamation cases is the costs subsequent to proceedings. Under a CFA, lawyers are paid nothing if they lose, but are allowed to claim a 'success fee' in addition to their basic fee if they win because of the risk incurred in taking the claim. The level of the success fee is the main concern, with defamation lawyers more often than not claiming the full 100% uplift, which doubles their usual fees. If a claimant obtains 'after the event' insurance (ie, against the cost of losing and having to pay the other side's costs), an unsuccessful defendant will also have to pay a substantial insurance premium on top of the success fee. The problem that is currently plaguing defamation cases of late is that of celebrities using the CFA system to prevent the media from publishing anything controversial or critical about them, thus stifling freedom of expression. Moreover, a small publisher could well find itself out of business if it loses a CFA-funded case.About the Author: Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/no-win-no-fee.aspx" title="No Win No Fee">No Win No Fee</a>, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/the-story-behind-no-win-no-fee-and-defamation-claims-489928.html" title="The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims">The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims</a>

The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The main complaint about Cherie Blair using a conditional fee agreement in her specific case is that, as a relatively wealthy individual, she is in effect abusing the CFA system in order to force the magazine or newspaper into settling claims. Defamation/libel by its nature has always had the reputation of a tort that has been left to claimants who are wealthy as the cases often run into millions. The introduction of 'no win, no fee' agreements, or conditional fee agreements (CFAs), under the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 enabled those who would otherwise be unable to fund the substantial costs involved in defamation claims to bring an action. In cases where a wealthy individual (especially a celebrity) takes a media defendant to court, these media defendants find themselves paying up to settle the claim rather than losing what could be a very large amount at trial. The criticism is that they are fenced into paying out because of this even when the claim against them may be frivolous.

Defamation essentially takes places where a false statement is made about a person (or a company) that damages their reputation. The statement can be either in a permanent form (libel) or a transient form (slander). A company also has a reputation and contrary to popular belief can also be defamed.

Another problem that often comes to fruition in defamation cases is the costs subsequent to proceedings. Under a CFA, lawyers are paid nothing if they lose, but are allowed to claim a 'success fee' in addition to their basic fee if they win because of the risk incurred in taking the claim. The level of the success fee is the main concern, with defamation lawyers more often than not claiming the full 100% uplift, which doubles their usual fees. If a claimant obtains 'after the event' insurance (ie, against the cost of losing and having to pay the other side's costs), an unsuccessful defendant will also have to pay a substantial insurance premium on top of the success fee.

The problem that is currently plaguing defamation cases of late is that of

celebrities using the CFA system to prevent the media from publishing anything controversial or critical about them, thus stifling freedom of expression. Moreover, a small publisher could well find itself out of business if it loses a CFA-funded case.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/the-story-behind-no-win-no-fee-and-defamation-claims-489928.html

Article Tags: No Win No Fee, Claims

Related Videos
Related Articles
Ask / Related Q&A

Play

Small Business Advice - Franchise and Royalty Fees

Play

Learn About Franchise Fees

Play

How to Avoid ATM Fees

Play

Small Claims Court Procedures

Play

Collecting Judgments

Latest Personal Injury Articles
More from Saurav Dutt

Depositions – Understand How It Works

By: Thomas Ajava | 10/11/2009
Every lawsuit is based on the evidence presented in it. That is a rather obvious statement. The procedure for these lawsuits calls for a period of discovery. As the name suggests, this is the time when the parties find out what each other have in regards to evidence and generate testimony from the parties and witnesses regarding the events of the dispute. This testimony is gained through the deposition process.

Car Accident Compensation – Making a Claim after an Accident on the Road

By: Sean Butcher | 10/11/2009
If you are involved in a car accident, one of the last things that would cross your mind would be how to go about making a claim for car accident compensation. The experience is scary enough by itself, without the daunting thought of having to deal with solicitors and all the expense that comes with it.

Pursuing A Spinal Injury Claim

By: Ayesha Salim | 10/11/2009
The full impact of a spinal injury can be life changing. Not only must you deal with the physical and psychological scars of the injury, but also witness the affects of it on the loved ones around you. Most likely, other major areas of your life will be affected too.

Slip and Fall Accidents in West Virginia

By: Erich Shrefler | 10/11/2009
Public facilities must meet certain access criteria on their grounds to ensure easy access for everybody. The Americans with Disabilities act requires business serving the public to conform to the standards they have codified. Wheel chair ramps must have a certain pitch to them for example. Failure to provide adequate access not only violates the disabilities act, but it may make walking surfaces unsafe to handicapped and even non-handicapped pedestrians.

Lawsuit Cash Advances - Lawsuit Loans and Plaintiff Loans

By: Michael Jefferson | 10/11/2009
Lawsuit cash advances are non recourse loans that help plaintiffs with pending lawsuits get justice. Advances are available to all plaintiffs who are involved in a personal injury lawsuit.

How to Choose a Good Family Lawyer

By: Benard Worseley | 10/11/2009
Handling family issues is often not as easy as talking things over dinner. It may require the aid and legal advice of a family lawyer. Such legal matters include divorce, child custody, child support, division of properties, domestic violence, rights on properties, adoption and a lot more. Family issues are generally wide in categories but complicated in nature, that's precisely the reason why they require legal assistance to be able to deal with them properly.

Slip and Fall Injuries

By: Erich Shrefler | 09/11/2009
If your slip and fall injury was caused by the negligence of a property owner or manager, you have the right to hold that person responsible through legal action. When a visitor to a property suffers a preventable injury, the law of premises liability determines responsibility and is applicable to both residences and businesses.

Personal Injury Attorney Knoxville - How to Get Help

By: Jackson Le | 09/11/2009
If you've been injured in an accident in Knoxville that was caused by another person, it's likely that you're entitled to fair compensation from the other party or their insurance company. Accidents can cause harm to us in many ways. Not just physical pain, but mental or even emotional distress. Families and friends can be affected as well, the mental anguish for them being almost as traumatic as it is for you. You are entitled to claim for loss of earnings as well as compensation f...

To Claim or not to Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After suffering an injury because of an accident that is not your fault, instinct often tells us that we should seek redress immediately, and why not. However the road to battling an insurance company to get some kind of compensation all the way to the courtroom can often be a painful and disappointing venture. The litigation process can really eat up a lot of your time, money and effort. Therefore, it’s sometimes better to settle for less prior to trial than to go through the whole process and

The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The Nature of No-win-no-fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With constant criticisms of the no-win-no-fee system prevalent in almost every news story associated with the scheme, this article aims to underline and explain the essential features and benefits that were originally aimed to help people gain easier access to justice. Despite accusations of the scheme being used for purposes for which it was not created, various incidental features of it were introduced for a good reason and still help many clients in the UK.

The Advantage of No Win No Fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
No win no fee claims are an essential means of achieving access to justice. After an accident, no win no fee provides an easy way to litigate for compensation, thus keeping companies accountable as well as receive some mitigation for the negative circumstances that have been thrust on you.

Taking the Initiative at Work

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
All too often organisations only feel the need to take proactive intervention to reduce accidents at work when the fear of censure or criticism from the powers that be are looming. To that end, too many companies feel compelled to do something when the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) steps in to investigate.

Streamlining the Claims Process

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance.

Smoothening the Road to a Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 18/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After an accident, seeking legal redress often seems a necessary evil. Makin a personal injury claim is the natural step but the myriad of legal complications can often seem like a herculean task if you’re still trying to recover from the accident in question. There are ways to make the whole process as smooth as possible and ensure that getting reimbursed for the physical or psychological harm suffered is not as time consuming and costly as it seems.