The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

<h1>The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims</h1>Author: <a title="Saurav Dutt" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/saurav-dutt/57763.htm">Saurav Dutt</a> The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago.  This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims. The main complaint about Cherie Blair using a conditional fee agreement in her specific case is that, as a relatively wealthy individual, she is in effect abusing the CFA system in order to force the magazine or newspaper into settling claims. Defamation/libel by its nature has always had the reputation of a tort that has been left to claimants who are wealthy as the cases often run into millions. The introduction of 'no win, no fee' agreements, or conditional fee agreements (CFAs), under the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 enabled those who would otherwise be unable to fund the substantial costs involved in defamation claims to bring an action. In cases where a wealthy individual (especially a celebrity) takes a media defendant to court, these media defendants find themselves paying up to settle the claim rather than losing what could be a very large amount at trial. The criticism is that they are fenced into paying out because of this even when the claim against them may be frivolous. Defamation essentially takes places where a false statement is made about a person (or a company) that damages their reputation. The statement can be either in a permanent form (libel) or a transient form (slander). A company also has a reputation and contrary to popular belief can also be defamed. Another problem that often comes to fruition in defamation cases is the costs subsequent to proceedings. Under a CFA, lawyers are paid nothing if they lose, but are allowed to claim a 'success fee' in addition to their basic fee if they win because of the risk incurred in taking the claim. The level of the success fee is the main concern, with defamation lawyers more often than not claiming the full 100% uplift, which doubles their usual fees. If a claimant obtains 'after the event' insurance (ie, against the cost of losing and having to pay the other side's costs), an unsuccessful defendant will also have to pay a substantial insurance premium on top of the success fee. The problem that is currently plaguing defamation cases of late is that of celebrities using the CFA system to prevent the media from publishing anything controversial or critical about them, thus stifling freedom of expression. Moreover, a small publisher could well find itself out of business if it loses a CFA-funded case.About the Author: Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/no-win-no-fee.aspx" title="No Win No Fee">No Win No Fee</a>, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/the-story-behind-no-win-no-fee-and-defamation-claims-489928.html" title="The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims">The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims</a>

The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The main complaint about Cherie Blair using a conditional fee agreement in her specific case is that, as a relatively wealthy individual, she is in effect abusing the CFA system in order to force the magazine or newspaper into settling claims. Defamation/libel by its nature has always had the reputation of a tort that has been left to claimants who are wealthy as the cases often run into millions. The introduction of 'no win, no fee' agreements, or conditional fee agreements (CFAs), under the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 enabled those who would otherwise be unable to fund the substantial costs involved in defamation claims to bring an action. In cases where a wealthy individual (especially a celebrity) takes a media defendant to court, these media defendants find themselves paying up to settle the claim rather than losing what could be a very large amount at trial. The criticism is that they are fenced into paying out because of this even when the claim against them may be frivolous.

Defamation essentially takes places where a false statement is made about a person (or a company) that damages their reputation. The statement can be either in a permanent form (libel) or a transient form (slander). A company also has a reputation and contrary to popular belief can also be defamed.

Another problem that often comes to fruition in defamation cases is the costs subsequent to proceedings. Under a CFA, lawyers are paid nothing if they lose, but are allowed to claim a 'success fee' in addition to their basic fee if they win because of the risk incurred in taking the claim. The level of the success fee is the main concern, with defamation lawyers more often than not claiming the full 100% uplift, which doubles their usual fees. If a claimant obtains 'after the event' insurance (ie, against the cost of losing and having to pay the other side's costs), an unsuccessful defendant will also have to pay a substantial insurance premium on top of the success fee.

The problem that is currently plaguing defamation cases of late is that of

celebrities using the CFA system to prevent the media from publishing anything controversial or critical about them, thus stifling freedom of expression. Moreover, a small publisher could well find itself out of business if it loses a CFA-funded case.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/the-story-behind-no-win-no-fee-and-defamation-claims-489928.html

Article Tags: No Win No Fee, Claims

Related Videos
Related Articles
Ask / Related Q&A

Play

Small Business Advice - Franchise and Royalty Fees

Play

Learn About Franchise Fees

Play

How to Avoid ATM Fees

Play

Small Claims Court Procedures

Play

Collecting Judgments

Latest Personal Injury Articles
More from Saurav Dutt

Rhode Island Personal Injury Lawyer Written Article: Automobile - Car Accident - Damages - Pain & Suffering

By: david slepkow | 05/12/2009
Rhode Island Personal Injury law: auto - car - motorcycle accident frequently asked questions with answers written by RI personal Injury attorney. :

What To Do If You Get In A Car Accident

By: George Manty | 04/12/2009
This article explains the things you should know if you get into an car accident.

Undergoing Laser Eye Surgery

By: Ayesha Salim | 03/12/2009
Laser eye surgery is a smart option for those that wish to stop wearing their spectacles. If the surgery is carried out correctly than it can lead to great results for the patient concerned. The patient's self-assurance and quality of life will be enhanced and the surgery itself should not take very long.

Medical Negligence Occurring In Dentistry

By: Ayesha Salim | 03/12/2009
Many of us tremble at the thought of going to the dentist, as the very consideration of someone drilling into our tooth opens up a house of horrors. However, it is well acknowledged that going for a check-up is good for your health and we know that we should put great faith into the professionals that are taking heed of us.

The Finest San Diego Elder Abuse Attorneys Available

By: Berman & Riedel, LLP | 02/12/2009
If you are an elderly person and feel you have been abused, or perhaps your elderly friend or relative has been abused, San Diego elder abuse attorneys can assist you and provide a level of support needed. Unfortunately, elder abuse can occur anytime: in an individual’s home, in doctor’s office, in assisted living care or even in reputable institutions. It is essential to know and understand how you can help yourself or someone you know who is experiencing such terrible adversity.

Landmark MRGO Lawsuit Decision A Win for Hurricane Katrina Flooding Victims

By: Laurie Villanueva | 01/12/2009
A landmark ruling in a Hurricane Katrina lawsuit means that thousands of Louisiana flood victims could be eligible for compensation from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The ruling involved the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, also known as MRGO.

How To Get Ex Back

By: Jo Carreg | 01/12/2009
Look around and you will see lots of couple going through break-ups and patch-ups. What is more surprising is that a lot of these patch-ups are actually temporary and if you visit them after some

Cancer Misdiagnosis

By: Ayesha Salim | 01/12/2009
Cancer is a disease that cannot be pinned down to one solitary origin. There are a variety of factors which may help amplify the likelihood of an individual developing the disease. Your genes, general lifestyle, or even the surroundings may all donate to increasing the chances of budding the disease.

Whiplash not a Bogus Injury

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With accusations of a ‘compensation culture’ and ‘ambulance chasers’ being banded around liberally, people can often lose sight of the fact that whiplash injuries are a whole lot more serious than they are given credit for. Whiplash claims are often perceived to be the result of overactive imaginations by people who have suffered ‘just’ a small neck injury.

To Claim or not to Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After suffering an injury because of an accident that is not your fault, instinct often tells us that we should seek redress immediately, and why not. However the road to battling an insurance company to get some kind of compensation all the way to the courtroom can often be a painful and disappointing venture. The litigation process can really eat up a lot of your time, money and effort. Therefore, it’s sometimes better to settle for less prior to trial than to go through the whole process and

The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The Nature of No-win-no-fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With constant criticisms of the no-win-no-fee system prevalent in almost every news story associated with the scheme, this article aims to underline and explain the essential features and benefits that were originally aimed to help people gain easier access to justice. Despite accusations of the scheme being used for purposes for which it was not created, various incidental features of it were introduced for a good reason and still help many clients in the UK.

The Advantage of No Win No Fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
No win no fee claims are an essential means of achieving access to justice. After an accident, no win no fee provides an easy way to litigate for compensation, thus keeping companies accountable as well as receive some mitigation for the negative circumstances that have been thrust on you.

Taking the Initiative at Work

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
All too often organisations only feel the need to take proactive intervention to reduce accidents at work when the fear of censure or criticism from the powers that be are looming. To that end, too many companies feel compelled to do something when the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) steps in to investigate.

Smoothening the Road to a Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 18/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After an accident, seeking legal redress often seems a necessary evil. Makin a personal injury claim is the natural step but the myriad of legal complications can often seem like a herculean task if you’re still trying to recover from the accident in question. There are ways to make the whole process as smooth as possible and ensure that getting reimbursed for the physical or psychological harm suffered is not as time consuming and costly as it seems.