The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

<h1>The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims</h1>Author: <a title="Saurav Dutt" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/saurav-dutt/57763.htm">Saurav Dutt</a> The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago.  This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims. The main complaint about Cherie Blair using a conditional fee agreement in her specific case is that, as a relatively wealthy individual, she is in effect abusing the CFA system in order to force the magazine or newspaper into settling claims. Defamation/libel by its nature has always had the reputation of a tort that has been left to claimants who are wealthy as the cases often run into millions. The introduction of 'no win, no fee' agreements, or conditional fee agreements (CFAs), under the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 enabled those who would otherwise be unable to fund the substantial costs involved in defamation claims to bring an action. In cases where a wealthy individual (especially a celebrity) takes a media defendant to court, these media defendants find themselves paying up to settle the claim rather than losing what could be a very large amount at trial. The criticism is that they are fenced into paying out because of this even when the claim against them may be frivolous. Defamation essentially takes places where a false statement is made about a person (or a company) that damages their reputation. The statement can be either in a permanent form (libel) or a transient form (slander). A company also has a reputation and contrary to popular belief can also be defamed. Another problem that often comes to fruition in defamation cases is the costs subsequent to proceedings. Under a CFA, lawyers are paid nothing if they lose, but are allowed to claim a 'success fee' in addition to their basic fee if they win because of the risk incurred in taking the claim. The level of the success fee is the main concern, with defamation lawyers more often than not claiming the full 100% uplift, which doubles their usual fees. If a claimant obtains 'after the event' insurance (ie, against the cost of losing and having to pay the other side's costs), an unsuccessful defendant will also have to pay a substantial insurance premium on top of the success fee. The problem that is currently plaguing defamation cases of late is that of celebrities using the CFA system to prevent the media from publishing anything controversial or critical about them, thus stifling freedom of expression. Moreover, a small publisher could well find itself out of business if it loses a CFA-funded case.About the Author: Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to <a href="http://www.accidentsdirect.com/no-win-no-fee.aspx" title="No Win No Fee">No Win No Fee</a>, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/the-story-behind-no-win-no-fee-and-defamation-claims-489928.html" title="The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims">The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims</a>

The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The main complaint about Cherie Blair using a conditional fee agreement in her specific case is that, as a relatively wealthy individual, she is in effect abusing the CFA system in order to force the magazine or newspaper into settling claims. Defamation/libel by its nature has always had the reputation of a tort that has been left to claimants who are wealthy as the cases often run into millions. The introduction of 'no win, no fee' agreements, or conditional fee agreements (CFAs), under the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 enabled those who would otherwise be unable to fund the substantial costs involved in defamation claims to bring an action. In cases where a wealthy individual (especially a celebrity) takes a media defendant to court, these media defendants find themselves paying up to settle the claim rather than losing what could be a very large amount at trial. The criticism is that they are fenced into paying out because of this even when the claim against them may be frivolous.

Defamation essentially takes places where a false statement is made about a person (or a company) that damages their reputation. The statement can be either in a permanent form (libel) or a transient form (slander). A company also has a reputation and contrary to popular belief can also be defamed.

Another problem that often comes to fruition in defamation cases is the costs subsequent to proceedings. Under a CFA, lawyers are paid nothing if they lose, but are allowed to claim a 'success fee' in addition to their basic fee if they win because of the risk incurred in taking the claim. The level of the success fee is the main concern, with defamation lawyers more often than not claiming the full 100% uplift, which doubles their usual fees. If a claimant obtains 'after the event' insurance (ie, against the cost of losing and having to pay the other side's costs), an unsuccessful defendant will also have to pay a substantial insurance premium on top of the success fee.

The problem that is currently plaguing defamation cases of late is that of

celebrities using the CFA system to prevent the media from publishing anything controversial or critical about them, thus stifling freedom of expression. Moreover, a small publisher could well find itself out of business if it loses a CFA-funded case.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Related Videos
Related Articles
Ask / Related Q&A

Play

Small Business Advice - Franchise and Royalty Fees

Play

Learn About Franchise Fees

Play

How to Avoid ATM Fees

Play

Small Claims Court Procedures

Play

Collecting Judgments

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/personal-injury-articles/the-story-behind-no-win-no-fee-and-defamation-claims-489928.html

Article Tags: No Win No Fee, Claims

Latest Personal Injury Articles
More from Saurav Dutt

To Get That Whiplash Claims Today- Is Easy Now!

By: Lindsay Nolan | 04/07/2009
Whiplash is an injury that occurs during a car accident. The sudden jerk of the vehicle makes your neck and head move forwards and backwards causing an extension in the neck muscles and tendons. Whiplash injury makes the victim in a lot of distress. Whiplash injuries can be claimed compensation. You can get that whiplash claims today. For this you need to contact a whiplash lawyer.

Personal Injury Attorneys - The Experts in Tort Law

By: Caitlina Fuller | 03/07/2009
A personal injury lawyer is an expert in Tort law. This means that they specialize in cases that pertain to injuries whether they harm an individual physically or emotionally.

Personal Injury Lawyers – Making the Right Choice

By: Caitlina Fuller | 03/07/2009
Personal injury lawyers are lawyers who will fight for your rights as a victim of negligence. Negligence on the part of a company or an individual can cause serious harm to you or a family member. If you have fallen victim you may want to seek representation from a law firm that specializes in injury cases.

Atomic Test Veterans Given The Go Ahead For Case

By: Arti | 03/07/2009
Veterans who had been affected by atomic bombs have been allowed to take their cases to court so they can receive compensation after their heath had been seriously affected.

Women May Need To Watch Their Step

By: Darren | 03/07/2009
A woman received a compensation sum after falling and injuring herself in a high street store. This comes after reports state that women are more likely to be injured in public than men.

Car Accident Information-What To Do In an Accident

By: sofie777 | 03/07/2009
Car accidents are a leading cause of unnecessary deaths and therefore the number one source of personal injury claims. Many of the accidents occur due to negligence on the part of one of the drivers involved.When a car accident is caused by another party's negligence, people who are harmed are often eligible for compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering as well as other damages.

Falling Furniture Can Cause Severely Hurt Children

By: Joel Mclaughlin | 02/07/2009
Unknown to many is the fact that as flat-screen televisions become more popular in the United States, the number of accidents in which children are injured increases as well. This is because there have already been hundreds of cases reported in which children have been injured by flat-screen TV’s that have fallen from off the wall or the entertainment unit on which they sit.

Negligence

By: Nick Parkin | 02/07/2009
The legal definition of Negligence was first seen in English law with the case of Donoghue vs Stevenson. Negligence is described as an act or omission which results in damage to the claimant.

Whiplash not a Bogus Injury

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With accusations of a ‘compensation culture’ and ‘ambulance chasers’ being banded around liberally, people can often lose sight of the fact that whiplash injuries are a whole lot more serious than they are given credit for. Whiplash claims are often perceived to be the result of overactive imaginations by people who have suffered ‘just’ a small neck injury.

To Claim or not to Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 20/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After suffering an injury because of an accident that is not your fault, instinct often tells us that we should seek redress immediately, and why not. However the road to battling an insurance company to get some kind of compensation all the way to the courtroom can often be a painful and disappointing venture. The litigation process can really eat up a lot of your time, money and effort. Therefore, it’s sometimes better to settle for less prior to trial than to go through the whole process and

The Story Behind No Win No Fee and Defamation Claims

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
The recent controversy about Cherie Blair using a no win no fee firm for her libel case in the courts has highlighted what is perceived as the latest abuse of the system which was created to provide access to justice ten years ago. This article aims to highlight the relationship between no win no fee arrangements (otherwise known as conditional fee agreements) and defamation claims.

The Nature of No-win-no-fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
With constant criticisms of the no-win-no-fee system prevalent in almost every news story associated with the scheme, this article aims to underline and explain the essential features and benefits that were originally aimed to help people gain easier access to justice. Despite accusations of the scheme being used for purposes for which it was not created, various incidental features of it were introduced for a good reason and still help many clients in the UK.

The Advantage of No Win No Fee

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
No win no fee claims are an essential means of achieving access to justice. After an accident, no win no fee provides an easy way to litigate for compensation, thus keeping companies accountable as well as receive some mitigation for the negative circumstances that have been thrust on you.

Taking the Initiative at Work

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
All too often organisations only feel the need to take proactive intervention to reduce accidents at work when the fear of censure or criticism from the powers that be are looming. To that end, too many companies feel compelled to do something when the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) steps in to investigate.

Streamlining the Claims Process

By: Saurav Dutt | 19/07/2008 | Personal Injury
In light of the changes as to how personal injury claims should be handled, the widespread implications are not just to streamline the claims process as the Ministry of Justice envisages, but also to provide an incentive for insurers to make changes to systems, processes and organisational models in order to achieve high performance.

Smoothening the Road to a Claim

By: Saurav Dutt | 18/07/2008 | Personal Injury
After an accident, seeking legal redress often seems a necessary evil. Makin a personal injury claim is the natural step but the myriad of legal complications can often seem like a herculean task if you’re still trying to recover from the accident in question. There are ways to make the whole process as smooth as possible and ensure that getting reimbursed for the physical or psychological harm suffered is not as time consuming and costly as it seems.