Remember Me
forgot your password?

Dhs Publishes Top Screen Requirements – Flammable Chemicals

Late on Friday, June 8, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published the guidelines that organizations will need to follow to submit the Top Screen information to the DHS Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT). The information submitted through this secure web site will be used by DHS to determine if the chemical facility is a high-risk facility requiring further regulation under 6 CFR part 27, Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS).

The first people that will be required to submit information to the Top Screen module will be those facilities previously identified by DHS as probably being high-risk facilities. These organizations will be contacted by direct letters from DHS or by a notice being published in the Federal Register.

Two PDF documents show up on the DHS Top Screen instruction page, CSAT Top Screen Questions and CSAT Top Screen Users Manual. While both of these documents are rather long (80 pages and 66 pages respectively), it is obvious that DHS has worked hard to make this data collection effort as painless as possible. Facilities that will be required to submit information to the Top Screen Module will certainly want to print out the Top Screen Questions document and use it to record the information that they will be required to submit. This will help them to collect and organize the information in a way that will be easily accessible when they go online.

To make things easier to enter the necessary data on the chemicals of interest, DHS has taken the 300+ chemicals listed in Appendix A and grouped them into nine groups. Those groups are:

1. Toxic Chemicals.

2. Flammable Chemicals.

3. Explosive Chemicals.

4. Improvised Explosive Device (IEP) Precursor Chemicals.

5. Weapons of Mass Effect (WME) Chemicals.

6. Chemical Weapons/Chemical Weapon Precursor (CW/CWP) Chemicals.

7. Sabotage/Contamination Chemicals.

8. Mission Critical Chemicals.

9. Economically Critical Chemicals.

Each of these nine groups of chemicals will require responses to different kinds of questions based on they types of chemicals. In each category, however, there will be a preliminary list of chemicals from Appendix A for that category, with Yes and No checkbox beside the chemical. The default response will be No. The submitter will check the Yes box only for those chemicals on site or that had been on site within the last 12 months. Subsequent questions will only be asked for those chemicals marked Yes.

When determining how much of a chemical is considered to be on site, the Facility Submitter must take into consideration how much is in storage tanks, other containers, process equipment, and piping and in rail cars, both on site and on sidings immediately adjacent to the site. If there are documented procedures limiting the quantity on site, those can be taken into account. If there are no documented procedures, the maximum quantity possible in the various containers will be used to determine how much may be on site.

The Top Screen guidance introduces another concept that they use to evaluate the hazard associated with chemicals on site, the AHQ (Area of Highest Quantity). The AHQ tries to take into account the fact that if a chemical is distributed over a wide area in a facility it will probably be less of a risk during a terrorist attack, because it will be harder to release all of that chemical. To determine the AHQ you must determine where the largest concentration of the chemical is within a circle of a diameter of 170 feet. Thus, if there were a number of storage tanks on site, but were widely scattered you would use the largest tank or combination of tanks that would be in a single 170 foot diameter circle to determine the AHQ amount.

There are 89 chemical on the Flammable Chemicals list. These chemicals made the list because DHS believes that, if released, they will form a vapor cloud and, if ignited, have the potential for significant acute adverse consequences for human life or health due to explosion and fire. After selecting which flammable chemical(s) the facility has on site at or above the STQ limit the Top Screen will require the Submitter to provide the maximum amount on site and the maximum amount within the AHQ for each chemical identified. No other questions will be asked about flammable chemicals.

This will be a time consuming process to complete all of the Top Screen information, but it will not have to be done at a single sitting. The incomplete information will be saved between multiple sessions. Many facilities will not have to complete the entire 80 page process. There are many places, where depending on the answers to various questions, the Top Screen will notify the Submitter that the facility is not a high-risk facility and no further action is needed under 6 CFR part 27 until something changes at the facility. Some facilities will be told at the end of the submission that they are preliminarily designated a high-risk facility and must complete a Security Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) within 90 days. Most facilities, however, will have to complete the entire Top Screen only to be told that they might be declared a high-risk facility, but that determination will be made after further review at DHS. Those facilities will have to wait for a letter telling them what the preliminary out come will be.

Patrick Coyle

Patrick J. Coyle has 15 years experience with the US Army, including a stint as a Physical Security NCO in Europe. He has also spent 12 years working as a Process Chemist is a specialty chemical manufacturing company.

Further information about the new regulations concerning protecting chemical plants from terrorist attack can be found at http://www.members.aol.com/ChemPlantSec/ChemPlantSecurity.htm

DHS Top Screen Guidelines: http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/programs/gc_1169501486197.shtm

Rate this Article: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)
Print Email Re-Publish

Add new Comment



Captcha

  • Latest Politics Articles
  • More from Patrick Coyle

Indo-Pak relations

By: arif shafi | 04/01/2010
relation between Pakistan and India....

The Real Reason for the Afghanistan Occupation

By: Carlos Navarro | 04/01/2010
Economic interests, not national security, is what the war in Afghanistan is about

2009 Year Review - The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly From The American Political Class

By: Bruno Korschek | 03/01/2010
This article does a year end review of the good, the bad, and the ugly antics and initiatives of the American political class in 2009 using numerous and specifc examples of inane comments, flagrant conflicts of interest, wasteful spending and the few incidents of politicians doing good deeds.

Demand for Adult Services Should be Supplied Legally

By: Pat Boardman | 03/01/2010
The rules have changed for young people in today's world of recession and hard times. There are a plethora of beautiful women especially who can't face the prospect of humiliating small-town jobs at minimum wage. This article explores the possible benefits of legalizing prostitution in Canada.

A Career as a Senator - StudentScholarships.org

By: Drew Backley | 03/01/2010
Senators have probably the most important job in the whole political system of our democracy. They have to work with forty nine of their peers to make the government keep turning. They decide state and federal laws, as well as, set the bar year after year for the next generation. I want to be there. I want to work with forty nine of my equals and see what they think of our country and work with them on improving it.

Was Fort Hood Shooting About Jihad Or Indicative Of How Broken Our Mental Health System Is?

By: Kelly Burris, PhD | 02/01/2010
Nidal Hasan needs to be thoroughly investigated and prosecuted for this despicable crime at Fort Hood but it is important not to use him as yet another excuse for the incredible incompetence of the mental health industry. The most important information from the Generals and mental health professionals about the...

All Hail Janet Napolitano Secretary Of Homeland Security

By: Nui Kahuna | 01/01/2010
There are those who will say that it isn’t poor little Janet’s fault that she can’t find her ample ass with four sets of eyes and three pair of hands. She has the damnable itch that just won’t go away, the itch being those quirky jihadists that are seemingly immune to every powder, cream, and lotion the Obama administration wants to use in order to make everything soothingly calm.

Bhalessa exposes tall claims of successive governments

By: Sadaket Malik | 31/12/2009
India is striving to achieve the slogans like of “Health for All Food and Water for All, the government has had claimed progress and achievement of such programmes in rural areas, but when one go deep in the rural areas, the picture exposes the claims of the authorities as there are thousands of areas without health facilities, food, water and basic amenities.

House Holds First Hearing on New Chemical Facility Security Regulations

By: Patrick Coyle | 28/07/2007 | Politics
Assistant Secretary Robert B. Stephan testified before the House on Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection about actions that the Department of Homeland Security has taken to protect the chemical sector from terrorist attack. These are the first such hearings since the new CFATS regulations were published.

Update on Revisions of Appendix A, 6 Cfr Part 27

By: Patrick Coyle | 09/07/2007 | Politics
From comments made by Director Lawrence Stanton, Chemical Security Compliance Division at the recent Chemical Sector Security Summit, it appears that there are going to be substantial changes to Appendix A, Chemicals of Interest, to 6 CFR part 27, the new chemical facility security regulations. Publication of the final version is expected in the near future.

Iowa Senators Upset About Propane Security Rules

By: Patrick Coyle | 29/06/2007 | Politics
Iowa Senators take objection to new chemical security regulations affects on Iowa farmers. They miss the fact that large propane tanks are a potential terrorist target depending on where they are located. Some simple measures will get most farmers, who are not terrorist targets, through the requirements of the new DHS regulations.

Marking Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information Documents

By: Patrick Coyle | 26/06/2007 | Politics
Recently published DHS rules require chemical facilities to submit various types of information to DHS for the purposes of protecting high-risk chemical facilities from terrorist attack. That information contains sensitive Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI) that must be protected against unauthorized release. Properly marking CVI documents is an integral part of that protection.

What Chemical Facilities Need to Do to Protect Cvi

By: Patrick Coyle | 18/06/2007 | Politics
Each chemical facility that is required to submit a Top Screen to DHS as part of the Chemical Facility Anti-terrorismn Security (CFATS) regulation will have to establish a program to protect Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI) that they will be producing, receiving and maintaining files of. These types of information security will be new to most chemical facilities that have not worked with DOD or DOE security regulations.

Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information Security Requirements

By: Patrick Coyle | 15/06/2007 | Politics
DHS has established a information security classification, Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI), to help protect information submitted by chemical facilities under the new security regulations for chemical facilities from being released to business competitor or terrorist. The rules that go along with protecting CVI will place some new information security requirements on these facilities.

6 Cfr Part 27 Appendix a Changes not Being Made?

By: Patrick Coyle | 12/06/2007 | Politics
DHS recently published two guidance documents for completing the Top Screen Module in the Chemcial Security Assessment Tool. These documents reflect the exact same Screening Threshold Quantities listed in the proposed Appendix A, Chemical of Interest, to 6 CFR part 27 published in April, 2007. It seems that the complaints of the propane industry and university/medical labs did not result in the changes that they were looking for.

Dhs Publishes Top Screen Requirements – Flammable Chemicals

By: Patrick Coyle | 11/06/2007 | Politics
DHS just published the guidelines to be used for submitting information to the Top Screen Module of CSAT. Flammable chemical on the DHS list will require specific information on the amount of chemicals present on site.

Submit Your Articles Free: Signup
Article Categories




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.57, 6, w2)