Remember Me
forgot your password?

Has the Palestine Liberation Organisation Lost the Plot - or Missed the Boat?

Instead of immediately entering into negotiations with Israel - the promised outcome of the recent Annapolis meeting called by President Bush - the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) has wasted the past two weeks demanding Israel totally cease all current building activities in the West Bank as a condition of those negotiations proceeding.

This delaying tactic has failed in the past and failed again this time. Jews have every right to settle in the West Bank in international law and Israel has made it clear it will not agree to totally waive that right as a pre-condition to the conduct of negotiations.

Regrettably the Arabs have never stopped making such unrealistic and politically unattainable territorial demands for the last 90 years. Had they accepted proposals made by the international community 60-70 years ago, they would have had a flourishing and thriving State today in an area of former Palestine far greater than size they are now demanding.

Many similar opportunities have presented themselves since then but have been allowed to pass - by rejection or default. Some occurred before - and some after - the founding of the PLO in 1964. One was created in 2003 with the formulation of the Roadmap proposed by America, Russia, the United Nations and the European Union - the Quartet - but remains unimplemented in the smallest detail.

The PLO has actually gone backwards in political influence since the Roadmap was unveiled. It has lost political control in Gaza. It lacks the authority to enforce security and root out terrorism in the West Bank and Gaza - essential conditions for the Roadmap to have any chance of success. It is now but one of many political groups vying for power amongst the Palestinian Arabs.

Yet - ironically - it continues to receive substantial international financial assistance and diplomatic support despite continuing to make the following longstanding and non negotiable territorial - and in some cases abhorrently racist - demands that it knows can never be achieved in any negotiations:

1. That Jews be denied the right to settle in any part of the West Bank - part of the ancient biblical and internationally sanctioned Jewish homeland approved by the League of Nations and the United Nations

2. That all 450000 Jews currently living in the West Bank be uprooted from their homes and businesses located there.

3. That the West Bank become a Jew free zone.

4. That the Palestinian Arabs be granted sovereignty and statehood in all of the West Bank

5. That millions of Palestinian Arabs or their descendants be given the unconditional right to go and live in Israel.

These conditions are completely unacceptable to Israel. President Bush has made it clear he supports Israel’s position. The PLO knows this - yet it still pursues - and persists with - these impossible demands.

Two principal reasons underscore why these demands continue to be made:

1. They ensure that no resolution of the conflict will be possible thereby keeping alive the 43 year old PLO dream of driving all the Jews out of Palestine as the only solution.

This paranoia has been the stumbling block that has prevented the Arabs accepting any proposals over the past 70 years for the territorial division of Palestine between Jews and Arabs. The PLO agreed to amend its Charter in 1993 to reflect it had abandoned that position - yet has failed to do so to this day.

The PLO shares common ground in pursuing this goal with Islamic Jihad whose spokesman - Abu Hamza - stated in the Washington Post on 27 December:

"We will continue to bring terror and destruction and death among the Zionists until we uproot them from our land"

Hamas - the PLO’s main political rival - has declared that any negotiations "are valueless and weightless and would not serve the national cause of our people and would undermine its higher interests." KUNA - 27 December.

For Hamas that national cause is also the destruction of Israel.

So the tactic continues for the PLO to conduct Mickey Mouse negotiations whilst chipping away at the edges to secure some territorial or other advantage either before or during those negotiations such as freezing any building or settlement activity by Israel, trying to stop completion of the security barrier and procuring prisoner releases.

2. Continuing negotiations postpone the Arab League accepting the primary responsibility for ending the refugee status of the Palestinian Arabs living outside the boundaries of former Palestine - a status directly created by the invasion of Palestine by the armies of six Arab League members in 1948 and disgracefully and inhumanely perpetuated by the Arab League ever since.

The power inherent in the PLO being a negotiating partner is no doubt exhilarating. Travelling the world capitals and being received by Heads of State makes for the good life for those lucky enough to be part of it. But any chance of gaining statehood is an impossibility whilst these unrealistic demands continue to be made.

The PLO shows no signs of making any concessions and so is destined to continue to walk the path of statelessness - whilst the territory available for any such state is further diminished by new facts created on the ground that makes the likelihood of such a state in the future a territorial impossibility.

This position has arisen because the PLO has in reality never lost the plot - to create an Arab state in the whole of former Palestine over the ashes of Israel.

The post-Annapolis negotiations will ultimately be dubbed as “the negotiations to nowhere” resulting in the demise of the PLO as Israel’s negotiating partner. Once again the PLO will have missed the boat - probably the last boat it can ever hope to catch before it sinks into political oblivion.



david singer
David Singer is a foundation member of the International Analysts Network established in 2007 and the Convenor of Jordan is Palestine International established in 1979 which advocates the division of sovereignty of the West Bank and Gaza between Egypt, Jordan and Israel.
Rate this Article: 5 / 5 stars - 1 vote(s)
Print Email Re-Publish

Add new Comment



Captcha

  • Latest Politics Articles
  • More from david singer

Red Alert for Indian Nuclear Arsenal

By: Mohammad Mansoor Ali Ansari | 24/11/2009
Growing Naxals/Maoists insurgency has proved that Indian Nuclear Installations and its Arsenal are the soft targets for the Militants.

Red Alert for Indian Nuclear Arsenal

By: Mohammad Mansoor Ali Ansari | 24/11/2009
Naxals/Maoists are in full control of 45% of the Indian territory and their presence in the important cities where key nuclear installations are located raise huge alarm for India and nations around this huge country

Red Alert for Indian Nuclear Arsenal

By: Mohammad Mansoor Ali Ansari | 24/11/2009
Naxals/Maoists have now completely controlled 45% of India and they have their strong presence in the cities where key Nuclear Installations are located. The world cannot bear any catastropeh

Japanese Translation Workers Report More Trouble in Iraq

By: Pete Detlef | 23/11/2009
When it comes to Iraq, it seems like deadlines were meant to be broken and then broken again. According to Japanese Translation workers, the election may prevent US troops from coming home until August 2010.

Foreign students

By: ali | 23/11/2009
Pakistani students in the United Kingdom: “Pakistani students were favoured by USA aftermath of 9/11 have been discouraged. On the other side UK Universities insisted Pakistani students because of high academic and intellectual calibre and fluency in English which is helpful”. (June29, 2009 the Times) There is beyond a shadow of doubt, foreign students’ plays pivotal role in boosting up the economy of the UK ev

President Obama’s Green Initiative

By: Jonathan Gal | 23/11/2009
President Obama has set forth multiple bills which are designed to move the country, and thus the world, toward a completely different future in the way that we create, pay for, and utilize the energy resources that we need. Solar power is one of the key factors moving forward in this crusade, offering backup resources and a fine-tuned safety net for the research and design of our future power plants and advanced technologies.

Health care reform or government take over?

By: Schuyler Paul Johnson | 23/11/2009
Health care reform - good or bad? Will it increase or decrease costs? Is it fair and does its type work in other parts of the world?

The Callaway Wood And Your Golf Bag

By: Carole Rosenblum | 23/11/2009
A Callaway wood is an important investment to consider.

Palestine - Perpetual Pantomime Pursues Peace

By: david singer | 22/02/2009 | Politics
Benjamin Netanyahu's invitation to try and form Israel's next Government will see a cast of new faces - and some old ones - taking lead roles in the world's longest running pantomime trying to solve one of the world's longest running problems - what to do with the 6% of Palestine that belongs to no one.

Palestine - the Lieberman Factor

By: david singer | 13/02/2009 | Politics
Israel's biggest winner in the recent elections - Avigdor Lieberman - is not the ogre the media make him out to be.

Palestine - Obama Quicksteps Into the Quicksand

By: david singer | 06/02/2009 | Politics
President Obama is treading on dangerous ground in appearing to believe the two state option is still a possibility.

Palestine - George Mitchell Munches on Middle East Lunches

By: david singer | 01/02/2009 | Politics
President Obama's Middle East envoy - George Mitchell - has set off on his first trip to the Middle East under his new boss. What the boss had to say will need to be listened to very carefully by those with whom Mr Mitchell lunches.

Gaza - Cranky Ban Ki Engages in Hanky-panky

By: david singer | 23/01/2009 | Politics
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon seems intent on rebuilding Gaza and rehabilitating its citizens when the likelihood is that it will all be destroyed again whilst Hamas remains in occupation and political control. Giving the population the right to seek safe haven either permanently or temporarily in other countries until the political situation in Gaza is stabilised would seem a much wiser option to pursue.

Palestine - Bye Bye Bush, Onwards Obama

By: david singer | 19/01/2009 | Politics
President-elect Obama should learn from the failures of past Presidents to end the 130 years old Arab-Jewish conflict over Palestine and realize the best he can do at the present time and in the current circumstances is attempt to effectively manage - not resolve -the conflict.

Egypt and Jordan - Lifelines to Gaza and West Bank

By: david singer | 14/01/2009 | Politics
John Bolton, former US Ambassador to the United Nations and leading international analyst Daniel Pipes have both proposed independently of each other and within the space of a few days that Egypt re-enter Gaza and Jordan re-enter the West Bank to resume the roles they played in those regions between 1948-1967. This option to the failed Roadmap process is now starting to take root and could be the policy approach that President-elect Barack Obama could do well to fully consider.

Gaza - Oust Hamas or Surrender to Terror

By: david singer | 05/01/2009 | Politics
Hamas must be removed from Gaza if there is to be any hope of reconciliation between Jews and Arabs.Anything less will be surrendering to terror.

Submit Your Articles Free: Signup
Article Categories




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (1.19, 6, w1)