Remember Me
forgot your password?

House Holds First Hearing on New Chemical Facility Security Regulations

On July 24, 2007 the House Subcommittee on Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection held their first hearings on Chemical Facility Security since the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published the final interim regulations on Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards (CFATS, 6 CFR part 27) in April. Robert B. Stephan, Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Protection, testified about the current state of efforts DHS is taking to protect chemical facilities from terrorist attack.

Stephan updated the Subcommittee on previous voluntary efforts completed by some members of the chemical industry to update their security after the attacks of 9-11-2001. These include the American Chemistry Council's Responsible Care Security Code and Cyber Security Program as well as efforts by the National Association of Chemical Distributors, American Petroleum Institute, the Chlorine Institute, the Agribusiness Security Working Group, and the National Paint and Coatings Association.

He also described a wide variety of efforts that DHS is taking in coordination with other groups. Under the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) the chemical industry has partnered with DHS and other government agencies to form a Chemical Sector Coordinating Council (CSCC). As part of the Chemical Sector Specific Plan, teams will have conducted Comprehensive Reviews of security issues in Detroit, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Northern New Jersey and the Lower Delaware River areas by August of this year. Additionally, 394 chemical plants have been made eligible for grants under the Buffer Zone Protection Program. In June the first Chemical Security Summit was held with 350 industry attendees being briefed on DHS and CSCC plans and actions to date.

DHS is also working on training programs for the chemical sector. The Chemical Security Awareness Training Program, an on-line training tool for all chemical facility employees, will come on line this fall. A Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Device Training Program is under development for security officers who will be responsible for checking vehicles for explosive devices.

Next Secretary Stephan updated the Subcommittee on actions that DHS has taken to date under the new CFATS regulation. On June 8th the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT) went live for the first time and on June 11th DHS sent out notification letters to 50 known high-risk facilities that they were required to complete an initial Top Screen filing. These 50 facilities were aided by DHS inspectors so that a live trouble shoot of the system was effectively conducted.

In coordination with the Chemical SSP and the Oil and Gas SSP, additional facilities were identified for directed Top Screen Completion. To date (July 13th, 2007) 6,096 facilities have registered in the CSAT and are in some phase of Top Screen completion. These first two groups of facility registrations will serve as a learning program for DHS and the industry and provide a chance to work out the inevitable bugs in the system. Security Vulnerability Assessments (SVA) and Site Security Plans (SSP) should be in place for most of these facilities by year end.

The next phase of facility registrations will begin when the final version of Appendix A, DHS Chemicals of Interest, is published. Then, any facility that has (or plans to have) a chemical listed in the appendix at more than the published Screening Threshold Quantity (STQ) will be required to complete a Top Screen in the CSAT system.

Assistant Secretary Robert B. Stephan's testimony provides valuable insight into the way the CSAT system is operating. The way that the system is operating at individual facility levelsw will be protected information under the Chemical Vulnerability Information (CVI) rules. This type of aggregated information will be all that the general public will ever see. It would be helpful if this subcommittee and their Senate counterparts were to hold periodic review type hearings to allow the public to keep up to date on the progress that is being made in this important area of community security.

Patrick Coyle

Patrick J. Coyle has 15 years experience with the US Army, including a stint as a Physical Security NCO in Europe. He has also spent 12 years working as a Process Chemist is a specialty chemical manufacturing company.

Further information about the new regulations concerning protecting chemical plants from terrorist attack can be found at http://www.members.aol.com/ChemPlantSec/ChemPlantSecurity.htm

Subcommittee minutes: http://hsc.house.gov/hearings/index.asp?id=74

Rate this Article: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)
Print Email Re-Publish

Add new Comment



Captcha

  • Latest Politics Articles
  • More from Patrick Coyle

Sources: Obama, Dems to sidestep GOP on health care

By: alabi ayodeji | 07/01/2010
The full House of Representatives is not scheduled to return from vacation until January 12; the Senate meets January 19. But top representatives and senators, as well as their aides, have already been discussing the issue.

US new strategy not based on ground realities

By: Farman Nawaz | 07/01/2010
Recently America has announced that there is need of negotiations with those Taliban which do not want to live under the yoke of Al-Qaeda. Now the questions arise “are there different groups in Taliban, like good and bad Taliban?” And who is supporting those so called good Taliban? If these good Taliban can survive on their own and face Al-Qaeda and Bad Taliban so why America is not able to defeat those bad Taliban? And what is the difference in the policies of these two kinds of Taliban?

Chronic Disease of Provincialism and Ethnocentrism in Pakistan

By: M.AKRAM KHAN NIAZI | 07/01/2010
Promotion of Provincialism and Ethnocentrism by President of Pakistan is highly deplorable, and is against the Constitution of Pakistan, in which it is the basic Policy principle of Constitution of Pakistan which directs to make efforts against provincialism but our president is trying to promote provincialism and ethnocentrism.

How to avoid racial attacks in Australia?

By: C Vishy | 07/01/2010
Racial attacks in Australia have often been given a wrong intonation. This article looks at how Indians can avoid these racial attacks.

The hunt for Bin Laden continues

By: sanajai | 07/01/2010
I am not a big news fan to be honest I watch it mainly for the weather. To me it just seems every

Should Gordon Brown have used the 'C' Word?

By: Phil Marks | 06/01/2010
The high UK tax burden (more than 40% and growing) has been brought into sharp focus in the last few of months in the UK, but is really in the spotlight now as the General Election campaign gets underway, January week 1, 2010. The main UK election battle ground between the political parties is the massive mountain of debt facing Great Britain and how it is to be reduced. Gordon Brown has avoided using the word 'Cuts' - could it have cost him the Labour Party Leadership?

How many times the Sword is mentioned in Bible and Quran?

By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 06/01/2010
It is interesting that the sword is mentioned more than 400 times in the Bible (a year is 365 days!). On the other hand, the sword is never ever mentioned in the entire Quran.

After 1 Year, Obama vs. Reagan

By: Rex Camposagrado | 06/01/2010
How is President Barack Obama doing as we approached the end of his first year in office? Obama clearly inherited a difficult situation economically and only Reagan's time in office in the modern era came even remotely close.

House Holds First Hearing on New Chemical Facility Security Regulations

By: Patrick Coyle | 28/07/2007 | Politics
Assistant Secretary Robert B. Stephan testified before the House on Transportation Security and Infrastructure Protection about actions that the Department of Homeland Security has taken to protect the chemical sector from terrorist attack. These are the first such hearings since the new CFATS regulations were published.

Update on Revisions of Appendix A, 6 Cfr Part 27

By: Patrick Coyle | 09/07/2007 | Politics
From comments made by Director Lawrence Stanton, Chemical Security Compliance Division at the recent Chemical Sector Security Summit, it appears that there are going to be substantial changes to Appendix A, Chemicals of Interest, to 6 CFR part 27, the new chemical facility security regulations. Publication of the final version is expected in the near future.

Iowa Senators Upset About Propane Security Rules

By: Patrick Coyle | 29/06/2007 | Politics
Iowa Senators take objection to new chemical security regulations affects on Iowa farmers. They miss the fact that large propane tanks are a potential terrorist target depending on where they are located. Some simple measures will get most farmers, who are not terrorist targets, through the requirements of the new DHS regulations.

Marking Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information Documents

By: Patrick Coyle | 26/06/2007 | Politics
Recently published DHS rules require chemical facilities to submit various types of information to DHS for the purposes of protecting high-risk chemical facilities from terrorist attack. That information contains sensitive Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI) that must be protected against unauthorized release. Properly marking CVI documents is an integral part of that protection.

What Chemical Facilities Need to Do to Protect Cvi

By: Patrick Coyle | 18/06/2007 | Politics
Each chemical facility that is required to submit a Top Screen to DHS as part of the Chemical Facility Anti-terrorismn Security (CFATS) regulation will have to establish a program to protect Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI) that they will be producing, receiving and maintaining files of. These types of information security will be new to most chemical facilities that have not worked with DOD or DOE security regulations.

Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information Security Requirements

By: Patrick Coyle | 15/06/2007 | Politics
DHS has established a information security classification, Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information (CVI), to help protect information submitted by chemical facilities under the new security regulations for chemical facilities from being released to business competitor or terrorist. The rules that go along with protecting CVI will place some new information security requirements on these facilities.

6 Cfr Part 27 Appendix a Changes not Being Made?

By: Patrick Coyle | 12/06/2007 | Politics
DHS recently published two guidance documents for completing the Top Screen Module in the Chemcial Security Assessment Tool. These documents reflect the exact same Screening Threshold Quantities listed in the proposed Appendix A, Chemical of Interest, to 6 CFR part 27 published in April, 2007. It seems that the complaints of the propane industry and university/medical labs did not result in the changes that they were looking for.

Dhs Publishes Top Screen Requirements – Flammable Chemicals

By: Patrick Coyle | 11/06/2007 | Politics
DHS just published the guidelines to be used for submitting information to the Top Screen Module of CSAT. Flammable chemical on the DHS list will require specific information on the amount of chemicals present on site.

Submit Your Articles Free: Signup
Article Categories




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (1.65, 6, w3)