Remember Me
forgot your password?

I'm an Angry Californian ! How do I vote on California Proposition 1A ?

I'm an Angry Californian ! How do I vote California Proposition 1A ?
by Spencer Holly,angrycalifornian-com

I’m a long time resident of California; I’ve been paying all my taxes for 40+ years. I’ve always paid my way, and I’ve never had to use any State social services, etc, etc. I’m just an average Californian that is stung by the mess that we are in.

So, should I vote FOR or AGAINST, Prop 1A ?

Prop 1A (see complete text at the end of this article) is a California ballot initiative that is supposed to solve all of our financial problems, and prevent the same problems from occurring in the future. Of course, that is all pie in the sky, but, never the less,  every voter needs to decide on whether or not to support it.

This is a tough decision for me.

My initial instinct was to vote No; I was angry about the situation, as a whole, and at our so-called lawmakers, and Governor Schwarzenegger.

I was angry that California is in this spot, in the first place. It's disgraceful that a State that has always been touted as having the 7th largest economy in the World, is now on the verge of bankruptcy. And the fault lies squarely on the shoulders of our lawmakers, and our Governor. It was their extravagant spending, and poor and inept management that have put the whole State in the hole.

(And it also torques my jaw, that an overwhelming majority of Californians/Americans who have worked hard, saved their money, paid their taxes, have been good citizens, and contributed in a thousand positive ways, are being forced to bail-out the greedy degenerates among us.. but that is for another rant)

It's bad enough that we are in this spot, but, for months, our lawmakers were unable to find any solutions, and finally, with much fanfare, they shirk their duty, and responsibility, and come up with a 'solution' in the form of Prop 1A.

Our lawmakers are cowards, and there isn't a leader among them; (if anyone knows of one, please, please, let me know !). Prop 1A is the cornerstone of their solution; of their 'compromise’. If California voters do not approve it, then the whole mess will fall back into their laps.

For them, the failure of Prop 1A will essentially be a mandate to pass even harder hitting tax increases. And their response to the public outcry will be that it's not THEIR fault, it's the FAULT of the California voters who did not vote for Prop 1A.

On the other hand, if Prop 1A passes, and it fails to solve our financial problems, then, again, the fault will be with the voters, and not with our lawmakers.

It stinks !

What a deal; they win either way. Our lawmakers are obviously brilliant, and intelligent people, and they obviously all had to be of the same mind in order to cook-up such a masterful scheme, so why can’t they use that same intellect to find the solutions, no matter how difficult ?

So, where am I at, NOW ? I’m still on the fence.

Going-off half-cocked, and making an emotionally inspired angry choice, is not a responsible option. Coolness, and thoughtfulness needs to prevail.

I think some people who are against Prop 1A, are assuming that, if it fails, that lawmakers will be forced to make cuts in order to solve our financial woes. I guess they figure the State will simply lay-off  a million workers, and curtail services, and, poof, all our problems are solved.

And maybe that is true, but I haven’t seen any evidence that that will happen; it fact, like I said earlier, the failure of Prop 1A will probably be seen as a mandate for our legislators to raise taxes.

If Prop 1A does not pass, then what happens next ? More tax increases from the legislature ? Mass firings of State employees, and the shut-down of non-essential services, in the interest of maintaining essential services such as police and fire ?

Will the State go bankrupt, and what does that mean ? What happens when a State is bankrupt ?
Will our lifestyle degrade ? Will our roads become unusable ?

I don’t know the answers. If anyone does, please tell me... it’ll help me decide on which way to vote.

============================================
The official text of California Proposition 1A


PROPOSITION 1A
STATE BUDGET. CHANGES CALIFORNIA BUDGET PROCESS.
LIMITS STATE SPENDING. INCREASES “RAINY DAY” BUDGET STABILIZATION FUND.
OFFICIAL TITLE AND SUMMARY


STATE BUDGET. CHANGES CALIFORNIA BUDGET PROCESS.
LIMITS STATE SPENDING. INCREASES “RAINY DAY” BUDGET STABILIZATION FUND.


* Increases size of state “rainy day” fund from 5% to 12.5% of the General Fund.
* A portion of the annual deposits into that fund would be dedicated to savings for future economic downturns, and the remainder would be available to fund education, infrastructure, and debt repayment, or for use in a declared emergency.
* Requires additional revenue above historic trends to be deposited into state “rainy day” fund, limiting spending.

Summary of Legislative Analyst’s Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact:

* Higher state tax revenues of roughly $16 billion from 2010—11 through 2012—13 to help balance the state budget.
* In many years, increased amounts of money in state “rainy day” reserve fund.
* Potentially less ups and downs in state spending over time.
* Possible greater state spending on repaying budgetary borrowing and debt, infrastructure projects, and temporary tax relief. In some cases, this would mean less money available for ongoing spending.

===============================================================

Learn more about Prop 1A.

Learn more about Prop 1A

The End

Spencer Holly, AngryCalifornian

Spencer Holly

Spencer Holly is a long time resident of California, and has considered himself lucky to live in one of the most beautiful places on Earth, in terms of it's natural beauty, and it's people and lifestyle, and he is angry about the prospect that his utopia has become a laughing stock to the rest of the country, and the World. He is disgusted by all the baloney that is going on, and he's going to have his say.

Rate this Article: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)
Print Email Re-Publish

Add new Comment



Captcha
0
1. Ralph Delgado (07:40, 08.05.2009)
California has been spending much more than it has been taking in for quite a number of years. Despite claims to the contrary, our state is losing population and with the next census will likely see a decrease in representation in Congress. California has become too business hostile and too tax addicted thanks to the entrenched special interests. I too am a native Californian of over 50 years and we will be leaving the state soon to greener pastures.

Current times seem very similar to the time of proposition 13, people know the only way to stop, or at least, slow the spending spree is to deny more tax receipts for the out of touch politicians. The state's agenda has been hijacked by the public employee unions, whose benefits are bankrupting us.

Virtually at every election we see demands and cries for more money for the teachers (to help the children) and various other public employees unions (firefighters, police, etc, etc) imploring for more money. Each time they receive more money and there is no demonstrable benefit, then next election they demand more money; personally I have reached the breaking point.

If, or when, the state goes into bankruptcy (can't pay its creditors and bills) it will have to restructure it's debt with the lenders (and probably the bond holders will suffer) and it will be forced to pay more for new debt issuance. At that point the state will have no option left but to decrease out of control benefits.

Cheers,

Ralph
0
2. Spencer Holly (01:04, 12.05.2009)
Thanks for you comment, Ralph. It does make sense; the so-called entitlements are a great burden when times are tough.

These times are not similar to Prop 13. They were actually prosperous times, but Californians were angry because the State was receiving huge windfall profits because of the inflation in the housing market. The State was actually sitting pretty. The tax revolt was against the unfair tax hikes, and the fact that the State basically ignored the voters.

Times are different, now, because we are nearly bankrupt. I see anger, now, that is similar to the Prop 13 anger, but it seems like it is a little irrational vote against these propositions simply out of anger.

I suppose that if the State were forced into bankruptcy, then we could go back to ground zero, and renegotiate union contracts, and other so-called entitlements, and
get a fresh start, but bankruptcy should be a last resort, not an intended outcome.

It would make more sense, to me, to vote for the propositions, and get our economy back on track, and then vent our anger by putting our energies into fighting the entitlements, and such.

I'm still on the fence...

  • Latest Politics Articles
  • More from Spencer Holly

All Hail Janet Napolitano Secretary Of Homeland Security

By: Nui Kahuna | 01/01/2010
There are those who will say that it isn’t poor little Janet’s fault that she can’t find her ample ass with four sets of eyes and three pair of hands. She has the damnable itch that just won’t go away, the itch being those quirky jihadists that are seemingly immune to every powder, cream, and lotion the Obama administration wants to use in order to make everything soothingly calm.

Bhalessa exposes tall claims of successive governments

By: Sadaket Malik | 31/12/2009
India is striving to achieve the slogans like of “Health for All Food and Water for All, the government has had claimed progress and achievement of such programmes in rural areas, but when one go deep in the rural areas, the picture exposes the claims of the authorities as there are thousands of areas without health facilities, food, water and basic amenities.

Bhalessa unsung politicians' kashmir Policy

By: Sadaket Malik | 31/12/2009
The history of the state lacks absurdly the evidence of viewpoints made by majority of unsung heroes of the state on the trouble torn Kashmir. Their Kashmir policy, handling the situation of communal disharmony over time, the pages of history are absurdly lacking the mention of such epitomes of peace who played acted as a catalyst for the cementing Hindu Muslim amity during a course of time.

Niaz put Bhalessa on drivers' seat: A historical Analysis

By: Sadaket Malik | 31/12/2009
Gone are the days when area like of Bhalessa witnessed a tumultuous days. Of late, there was a paucity of community leadership on the one hand and sacracity of a membership in assembly to represent the improvised terrain of Bhalessa on the other.

Bhalessa: A saparate political identity imperative

By: Sadaket Malik | 31/12/2009
Of late, the people in governance are in favor of creation of separate constituency under the pretext of wazir Commission report. Administrative reforms are already in place. The recent changes seemed to be happened.

Get Latest Steering News of India in One Simple Click

By: NancyDante | 31/12/2009
Zopag.com is leading Live Breaking News web portal includes Live Breaking News from India, World, Entertainment, and Lifestyle for 24x7. Exclusive Breaking News of India, Latest Breaking News in India.

Obama Wasn't Kidding About Being The Education President

By: sanajai | 31/12/2009
If President Obama has his way, next summer’s public school vacation may be sharply reduced. The president believes that American kids spend too little time in school, and this puts them at a disadvantage with other students around the globe.

Facts about the Vietnam War

By: Samus Bendwan | 31/12/2009
The Vietnam war was a milestone moment in world history. Much of the Earth today is shaped by the events from this crucial war.

Cap and Trade is Cap and Tax and Tax and Tax

By: Spencer Holly | 30/06/2009 | Politics
The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, H.R. 2454, better known as cap and trade, passed the House on June 26th. The vote was 219, to 212. The Cap and Trade bill, which is a massive tax increase, exploits the good intentions of environmentally conscience individuals by masquerading as a solution the global warming.

Senator Boxer Should Work to Bring the Gitmo Detainees to California

By: Spencer Holly | 03/06/2009 | Politics
In an interview with CNN, our California Senator, Barbara Boxer, made the following statement when asked about housing the Gitmo prisoners in California:

Diane Feinstein is Right about Gitmo

By: Spencer Holly | 27/05/2009 | Politics
According to news reports, Senator Dianne Feinstein is championing the unpopular notion that the detainees currently housed in Guantanamo (Gitmo), can and should be moved to American soil. I agree one hundred percent.

The Federal Government Should Offer Early Retirement to Baby Boomers

By: Spencer Holly | 15/05/2009 | Economics
In attempting to reduce high unemployment rates, the conventional wisdom is that unemployment is caused by a lack of jobs. That makes sense, until you analyze the size of the employed workforce. The reality is, if you reduce the size of the employed workforce, you will effectively decrease the unemployment rate. It is a fact that workers who drop out of the workforce will decrease unemployment

We Need to Legalize Retroactive Abortions

By: Spencer Holly | 14/05/2009 | Humor
Do you have trouble controlling your teenager ? This proposal will absolutely resolve all teenager issues, and you will have a new child who is kind, and helpful, and loving.

An Angry Californian Wants to Know Why Nancy Pelosi lied

By: Spencer Holly | 12/05/2009 | Politics
Nancy Pelosi's denial and lie regarding her knowledge of U.S. torture policy, is so blatant, that it is hard to believe that she really knew what she was doing, or she just figured she was beyond reproach, and that no one would check her story. It is a mystery to me.

I'm an Angry Californian ! How do I vote on California Proposition 1A ?

By: Spencer Holly | 29/04/2009 | Politics
I've been a California resident for over 30 years, and I've never been ashamed of my State until now. Because of massive mismanagement, and massive ineptness, and, frankly, cowardice, we've gone being the 7th largest economy in the world, to an economy is near bankruptcy, and political environment that is bankrupt.

American Era History Book Review: The Civil War Through The Camera

By: Spencer Holly | 04/03/2009 | History
Over 600,000 Americans died during the Civil War. This book tells that story in the fine dramatic prose of the post-Victorian era. This is a comprehensive textual work that is supported by hundreds of actual battlefield photographs.

Submit Your Articles Free: Signup
Article Categories




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.19, 1, w3)