Iraky War: United States Can Afford to Deny It?

John Mc Cain, the rough warrior with the accomplice attractive damsel Sarah Palin or the renovator and pacific Barack Obama with the experienced Joe Biden?

It's not the matter!

The matter in this presidential election is the soul of the United States: their ethical aspect on the world. The sacrificial offer on the altar of the history? Should not be!

Usually who risk to do wrong is who act and after the second world war the ball of the history has passed to the United States. Two thousand years ago the ball had been by the Romans...  (so they rest since long time!) Sometimes the Spaniards has. More recently the English... now the Americans!

The iraky war had a complicated beginning, because have been decided to begin her only if the weapons of mass destruction would have been found and Saddam would have refused those to deliver.
This was instead the functional trap that turn her into an inevitable fact.

why? Not found didn't mean that there were not!
If the weapons had been found, would have brought elsewhere and all would have been resolved.
But they didn’t find those!

For the United States would have been a negligible matter:they stay in the other side of the planets! For Israel instaed, it turned into a nightmare.

The doubt that Saddam Hussein had well put back its chemical weapons and the geographical proximity, created a terrible risk for the small one and demografically assembled Jewish state! An surprise strike would easily have destroyed the whole population.

In that days I observed the events and I noticed a strange silence in the Jewish government. Appraising the delicate political context, I imagined what the leaders of the respective government were tolking ich other. Not a lot..."You make it or I do!" "I beg you not to move, I make it!"

I propose the riddle... who said and what? (Difficult? ...don't warry!)

Let's value shortly the circumstance.Israel would certainly have attached the Irak. Could not be else! Saddam Hussein had already used the chemical weapons against the Kurdish populations. It was not a shin bone of saint and it doesn't need of further tests.

Immediately after, Egipt and Siria would have attached Israel and probably followed from all other Arabic nation, because at that time it was diffused among the Moslems, the opinion that striking together would have gotten the destruction of the Jewish state before the United States or the Europa could help.

Obviously the scenery contemplates the following intervention of the United States! The logical conclusion of this analysis was that it was more sensible to avoid the explosion of the whole middle east by engaging a limited war, but enough to hold under control the dictator Saddam Hussein.

In the facts, beginning a war that today it comes still misunderstood, the United States chose the smaller evil. Correct or not to attack Irak? Difficulty to answer. What can define instead sure, is that without the intervention of the United States our present would be different. Really, dramatically different!

A middle east destroyed four years ago would have already realized probably the more atypical dream of every Bin Laden: a disastrous and total fall of the stock markets that would have dissuaded the western world from the middle east business. So much to leave the moslem free hands to definitely resolve to them way, the matter Palestinian Israel!

The United States also, serenely choose their president, but don't allow him to annihilate the tempering of the nation. The American pax, as two thousand years ago was the Roman pax, can be controversial but always better than a barbaric planet.

United States can't afford to deny iraky war, it would be a political suicide and useless wound for his soul! Can't! Even not for a presidential election...

Ulisse Di Bartolomei