Scott Hughes administrates the Philosophy Forum, which include a Philosophy of Politics Forum. Please come to the forums and discuss philosophy with us. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.
Many people wonder why governments tend to spend so much money. Almost everyone has realized that the governments spend lots of money on various projects. Governments engage in many expensive endeavors that have little use and/or have little effectiveness. For example, the United States government spends trillions of dollars every year.
Unfortunately, taxpayers have to foot the bill. Most private citizens who follow politics probably find themselves wanting to bang their heads against the wall at how stupidly and wastefully their government spends money.
It may not seem to make sense, but it actually does. Governments do not take on expensive projects despite how much the projects cost; governments take on the projects because the projects cost so much.
We can understand this more fully if we take note of the nature of spending money and the nature of humans.
Regarding the spending of money, while one person spends money another person receives money. The private citizens and taxpayers look at government spending as spending, but the people in power who the make decisions look at it as revenue. For example, if a government project costs taxpayers $5 billion, then that means the government and its business associates have received $5 billion.
Since bureaucrats, politicians, and their cronies all earn money by spending the taxpayers' money, human nature tells us that they will try to "spend" as much as possible. Expecting otherwise would be analogous to giving a person a credit card and telling that person that someone else would have to pay the bill, and then expecting the person not to charge up a huge bill. Obviously, the person would charge up a huge bill because someone else will have to pay it. And governments will similarly rack up as huge of a bill as they can because other people have to pay for it.
To make the most money for themselves and their cronies, politicians and bureaucrats take on expensive projects even when the projects have little use. For the same reason, politicians and bureaucrats try to get the government involved in futile but expensive endeavors, such as the war on drugs. By getting into these futile but expensive endeavors, they have a constant excuse to spend lots of money.
As another example, most people see the Iraq War and the current occupation of Iraq as a huge blunder. They think this even despite all the government's propaganda supporting the war and despite all the misinformation supporting the war. It makes sense that most of the taxpaying people see the war as a mistake because it will cost them trillions of dollars. But it also makes sense that the government and the involved special interest groups support the war because they will get trillions of dollars in revenue from it.
Governments want to spend money without actually fixing problems. Governments want the problems to continue so that the governments have an excuse to continue spending money.
As long as a government can spend other people's money, it will spend it as seemingly wastefully as it can. I see the only solution as stopping the government from spending money. Government spending corrupts society, and I think we can only reduce that corruption by reducing government spending. The governments obviously will not reduce it themselves, so the people have to do that. The taxpayers have to stop letting their governments spend their money.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A
- POLITICS, MAJOR ISSUE OF TODAY'S WORLD
- Reputation Management – Politics in an Online Age
- Politics: the Ugliest Fascination on Earth
- Method to Ethically Eliminate All Political Corruption
- The Politically Incorrect Tee
- The Sharp Political Humor of Will Rogers
- The Present Political Turmoil in My Country
- Surviving Office Politics at your New Job




Indiana Seeks to Limit Legalized Graft and Payola to State Legislature by J.E. Ante
By: Joseph Ante | 22/11/2009Legalized government graft and payola is too expense in these lean economic times and needs to have clear limits so big businesses can survive. A new $50 limit per reportable gift will cut in half the current $100 limit on payola to legislators.
Need to look beyond ideological issues
By: Farman Nawaz | 22/11/2009These discussions will not bring prosperity to our country. Once a Chinese leader Deng Zio Peng, who is also well-known for his ideological differences with the great Chinese leader Moa, said that it does not matter that the cat is white or black but it must catch the rat.
Government Truth Squads?
By: Ernie Fitzpatrick | 22/11/2009How embarrassing it is when a hacker gets into personal and private email accounts, especailly when the subject is global warming.
Limitless Affordable Energy without Climate Changes
By: Klaus H Hemsath | 22/11/2009A long-term energy plan is proposed that will provide clean energy for centuries. It is based on inexhaustible energy sources, accessible energy technologies, limitless energy supplies, and a reversal of atmospheric carbon dioxide accumulation. A few novel energy technologies are identified that will assure sustained growth of world economies and can provide clean energies forever without ecological damages to our Earth.
Bill Maher Tickets Where to Find Cheap Bill Maher Tickets
By: Doug Muraski | 22/11/2009Searching for Bill Maher Tickets? One of the best poltical comedians of our time. Go to a show now with the entire family.
Political Leaders are Now on the Internet
By: Network 18 | 21/11/2009Political leaders secure a very good place among us and they are those big time legends who have crafted a mark in their lives. Connect.in.com is the place that offers you an opportunity to know more and more about them.
War of rumors and realities
By: Farman Nawaz | 20/11/2009In Pakistan people can’t set apart rumors and realities. Still a lot of mysteries are undisclosed. For a very long time people were confused that whether Pakistan army is sincere in war against terror or it is just misleading the international community to get maximum funds. In fact the policy of army was compelling the people to thick like this. In different areas army started operations and local community supported Pakistan army but all of a sudden the operations were stopped and agreements w
Afghanistan – Where Men Rule and Women Are Legally Rape
By: Linda Lycett | 20/11/2009With the latest advent of the law advocating ’legal’ rape against married women, is there such a thing as democracy and women’s rights in Afghanistan. Apparently not, judging by the law that was passed on 27 July 2009 giving men ‘legal’ right to refuse maintenance to their wives if they refuse to be raped. This law is a further demoralisation for women in Afghan society.
Why Do People Fear Sex?
By: Scott Hughes | 31/03/2008 | SexualityWhy do the people in our society tend to have such negative feelings towards sexuality? Why do so many cultures throughout the globe fear and hate sex?
Personal Attacks in Philosophical Discussions
By: Scott Hughes | 18/03/2008 | PsychologyAn ad hominem argument consists of replying to a person's argument by merely attacking the character of the person making the argument.
What it Means for an Action to be Immoral
By: Scott Hughes | 07/03/2008 | PhilosophyWhat does it mean to call an action morally good or morally bad? Different people use those terms to mean very different things.
Philosophy of Politics - We Do not Need Prisons
By: Scott Hughes | 29/02/2008 | PoliticsDo prisons really protect people from violence and victimization, or do prisons just make matters worse?
Political Philosophy - Why Governments Overspend
By: Scott Hughes | 21/02/2008 | PoliticsGovernments engage in many expensive endeavors that have little use or little effectiveness. Unfortunately, taxpayers have to foot the bill.
Corporate Crime Needs More Attention
By: Scott Hughes | 19/02/2008 | PoliticsCorporations perform the most major forms of criminal victimization. Corporate crime inflicts far more damage on society than street crime.
Philosophy - Can Humans be Perfectly Happy?
By: Scott Hughes | 13/02/2008 | PsychologyMost people can probably tell you whether or not they feel happy. Nonetheless, the idea of happiness becomes very complex and interesting when we look at it from a philosophical perspective.