Why Do We Trust Politicians?

<h1>Why Do We Trust Politicians?</h1>Author: <a title="Tim Bryce" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/tim-bryce/6018.htm">Tim Bryce</a> I was looking over some political polls recently and noticed the approval ratings of Congress are dismally low, 13-37% depending on the poll you read.  Offhand, this would indicate we do not believe they are doing the job we elected them to do, and a violation of our trust.  But America is not alone in this regards; in the reports I read, politicians around the world are generally not trusted.  In one report I read, used car salesmen were judged to have better integrity than politicians, and they may very well be on to something here. We may like to grumble about politicians but I tend to believe we trust them a lot more than we think.  After all, how were they elected to office to begin with and why do we keep reelecting them term after term?  Is it because there are no other qualified candidates to do the job?  Is the pay and benefits bad?  I don't think so.  Actually, I think the public's outrage is gone and, knowing this, our government officials feel free to do whatever they want. We elect government officials to uphold the interests of their constituents and for the common good.  Hopefully, the politicians will have the same interests and moral values as the people they represent, but somewhere along the way the politicians inevitably get their priorities mixed up and forget what they were elected to do. After a politician has promised the voter the world on a platter, he is basically free to make decisions and vote as he sees fit, regardless of pertinent opinion polls.  In fact, politicians are probably more interested in what the lobbyists have to say than their own constituents.  This means accountability is really what is at the core of the issue here. It has been my experience that voters tend to gloss over the politician's record while in office.  As an employer, I tend to keep track of employee punctuality, absenteeism, and decisions and mistakes made.  Conversely, voters should be made aware of their elected official's actions in office, such as attendance at meetings, and voting record.  Since we periodically prepare evaluation reports for employees, what's wrong with producing a similar report for our officials on a routine basis, such as annually?  After all, who works for who here?  Aside from implanting electrodes in the politician's head, I know of no other way to rebuild trust than to routinely review the official's work.  If it works in business, why not in government? Perhaps the biggest fear we have as voters is political corruption, and the temptation to become such can be irresistible to even the best of us.  Far too many politicians have become exceedingly rich and powerful due to kickbacks in support of lobbyists.  Interestingly, I cannot seem to find this in the job description for any government official.  Years ago, Milton Eisenhower pointed out the President of the United States has the power to call for a Continental Congress whereby our governing rules can be reexamined and amended accordingly.  Such a Congress has not been held for over 200 years.  Think about it, this would be a golden opportunity to revise our electoral process, rethink the role of lobbyists, and determine performance evaluations for our officials, among other things.  Regrettably, there is nobody on the horizon with the political fortitude to do this.  Only the American people can put forth the necessary political pressure to call for such a Congress, but unfortunately, the public isn't that strong or sophisticated, consequently, the politicians will continue on their merry way and the taxpayers will continue to distrust their officials. Next time you find yourself upset about politicians violating the public trust, ask yourself how outraged you are and what you are willing to do about it.About the Author: Tim Bryce is a writer and management consultant located in Palm Harbor, Florida.
<a href="http://www.phmainstreet.com/timbryce.htm"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.phmainstreet.com/timbryce.htm">http://www.phmainstreet.com/timbryce.htm</a></a>

He can be contacted at: <a href="mailto:timb001@phmainstreet.com">timb001@phmainstreet.com</a>

Copyright © 2009 Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/why-do-we-trust-politicians-847392.html" title="Why Do We Trust Politicians?">Why Do We Trust Politicians?</a>

I was looking over some political polls recently and noticed the approval ratings of Congress are dismally low, 13-37% depending on the poll you read. Offhand, this would indicate we do not believe they are doing the job we elected them to do, and a violation of our trust. But America is not alone in this regards; in the reports I read, politicians around the world are generally not trusted. In one report I read, used car salesmen were judged to have better integrity than politicians, and they may very well be on to something here.

We may like to grumble about politicians but I tend to believe we trust them a lot more than we think. After all, how were they elected to office to begin with and why do we keep reelecting them term after term? Is it because there are no other qualified candidates to do the job? Is the pay and benefits bad? I don't think so. Actually, I think the public's outrage is gone and, knowing this, our government officials feel free to do whatever they want.

We elect government officials to uphold the interests of their constituents and for the common good. Hopefully, the politicians will have the same interests and moral values as the people they represent, but somewhere along the way the politicians inevitably get their priorities mixed up and forget what they were elected to do. After a politician has promised the voter the world on a platter, he is basically free to make decisions and vote as he sees fit, regardless of pertinent opinion polls. In fact, politicians are probably more interested in what the lobbyists have to say than their own constituents. This means accountability is really what is at the core of the issue here.

It has been my experience that voters tend to gloss over the politician's record while in office. As an employer, I tend to keep track of employee punctuality, absenteeism, and decisions and mistakes made. Conversely, voters should be made aware of their elected official's actions in office, such as attendance at meetings, and voting record. Since we periodically prepare evaluation reports for employees, what's wrong with producing a similar report for our officials on a routine basis, such as annually? After all, who works for who here? Aside from implanting electrodes in the politician's head, I know of no other way to rebuild trust than to routinely review the official's work. If it works in business, why not in government?

Perhaps the biggest fear we have as voters is political corruption, and the temptation to become such can be irresistible to even the best of us. Far too many politicians have become exceedingly rich and powerful due to kickbacks in support of lobbyists. Interestingly, I cannot seem to find this in the job description for any government official.

Years ago, Milton Eisenhower pointed out the President of the United States has the power to call for a Continental Congress whereby our governing rules can be reexamined and amended accordingly. Such a Congress has not been held for over 200 years. Think about it, this would be a golden opportunity to revise our electoral process, rethink the role of lobbyists, and determine performance evaluations for our officials, among other things. Regrettably, there is nobody on the horizon with the political fortitude to do this. Only the American people can put forth the necessary political pressure to call for such a Congress, but unfortunately, the public isn't that strong or sophisticated, consequently, the politicians will continue on their merry way and the taxpayers will continue to distrust their officials.

Next time you find yourself upset about politicians violating the public trust, ask yourself how outraged you are and what you are willing to do about it.

Tim Bryce is a writer and management consultant located in Palm Harbor, Florida. http://www.phmainstreet.com/timbryce.htm

He can be contacted at: timb001@phmainstreet.com

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/why-do-we-trust-politicians-847392.html

Article Tags: tim, bryce, mba, florida, politicians, trust

Related Videos
Related Articles
Ask / Related Q&A

Play

Benazir Bhutto Biography

Play

Nancy Astor Biography

Play

Bill Clinton Biography, Part 1

Play

Margaret Thatcher Biography, Part 1

Play

Great Careers: Politician

Latest Politics Articles
More from Tim Bryce

War and good governance can’t go together

By: Farman Nawaz | 08/11/2009
Governance means to minimize the political, social and economical shortcomings of a state by the proper utilization of government machinery, civil society, media and market. If the mandatory objectives are achieved successfully, it is called good governance. But normally common people define good governance as excellent performance of the administrative bodies of the state. Common people also think that these administrative bodies of the state are at the mercy of the political government. T

Presidential Assassinations

By: Jordan Robert K. | 06/11/2009
First there have been four successful Presidential assassinations, at least three of which were ardent opponents to the central banking monopoly of power. Starting with Abraham Lincoln, the first successful Presidential assassination, we see that the bankers and the President were diametrically opposed.

The National Debt

By: Hubert Crowell | 06/11/2009
On November 3rd 2009 the National Debt reached 12 Trillion Dollars. As I tried to grasp this number and get an understanding of it, I could not. I then decided to reduced the numbers down to something that I could understand.

Feasibility and Realities of Secession

By: Rick Green | 06/11/2009
Many may not realize that in many of the States of the Union there are debates and discussions going on in their legislatures concerning Secession. The tenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution wherein the Federal Government is grnted specific responsibilities. This article discusses some of the areas that need be seriously consideed and the practical problems of Secession.

Nigeria and Idea of Failed States

By: Webmaster | 06/11/2009
It is easy to call anyone a bastard because it soothes our anger yet it is the facts of the other's character that is the proof or otherwise of what he truly is. Since the US subtly categorised Nigeria as a failing State, it had set up a gale of agitations, that threatens to cause the collapse on its own. Yet the truth is that indices used to make such categorisation has been with Nigeria virtually throughout her existence as a modern nation from independence in 1960.

IMMEDATE ACTION REQUIRED

By: Michael Douglas Carlin | 05/11/2009
We must stabilize real estate now. Inaction will lead to disaster.

Neutralizing Indian factor in Afghanistan

By: Farman Nawaz | 05/11/2009
This fear factor is a major part of our foreign policy. National interests and nationalism are the realities of the world. If we look at the Afghanistan problem, it is evident that Afghanistan is centre of clashes of interests and nationalism. If this issue is not solved with regional approach, it can cause in vivisection of the region. No one is having a solution that is acceptable to all the concerned countries and neither we see a single revolutionary or national movement in Afghanistan that

A Guide To Travelling The Boston Freedom Trail

By: Brad Alexzander | 05/11/2009
The Globe Cheap Budget Travel Guide Book is well over 100 pages of everything you need to know about saving BIG on your next vacation! It covers everything from travel agents to Free Travel.

Why Project Management Fails

By: Tim Bryce | 21/10/2009 | Management
Four reasons why project management breaks down.

The Problem with "Man Hours"

By: Tim Bryce | 16/09/2009 | Project Management
I've never been comfortable with the concept of "Man Hours," not that it's a gender issue, but rather it implies ignorance of how time is used in the work place and fumbles away some simple management concepts needed to run any business, namely accountability and commitment. Actually, I thought the "Man Hour" concept disappeared with the passing of the 20th century, but it appears to be making a comeback.

Humor in the Work Place

By: Tim Bryce | 31/08/2009 | Management
When and how humor should be injected in the work place.

Software Versions and Releases

By: Tim Bryce | 31/08/2009 | Software
Are the words synonymous? Can they be used interchangeably?

Challenging the Status Quo

By: Tim Bryce | 28/08/2009 | Management
Stagnation is not an option.

Information Systems Theory 101

By: Tim Bryce | 13/08/2009 | Programming
Provides a conceptual foundation for all Information Systems work.

Remembering Names

By: Tim Bryce | 27/07/2009 | Customer Service
The importance of remembering names. It's just good business.

Credit Scores

By: Tim Bryce | 27/07/2009 | Credit
Whether we like it or not, our lives are greatly impacted by our financial credit scores. If you have a good credit rating, lending institutions are more than happy to loan you the money to buy a house, a boat, a car, help you start a business venture, or whatever. If you have a bad rating, you're basically stuck in Nowheresville.