|
|
|||||||
| Home Page |
|||||||
Freudian Analysis on the Main Characters of “hamlet – the Prince of Denmark”Related Videos
Use Natural Medicine No. 8 Network Spinal Analysis
Based on Chapter 10 from The Beginners Guide to Natural Living by...
Financial Analysis Using Excel, Part 1
This video is the 1st in a 4-part series that presents the...
Business Planning: The Customer Analysis Section
How to write the customer analysis section of your business... Taking into consideration that a Freudian analysis has to do with the unconscious, some of the characters may be analyzed more deeply than others. Hamlet, the Prince, for example, gives us a vast field of interpretations. Some would say that he had developed (like any human beign) the Oedipus complex and it would start his feeling towards his mother, the Queen. This, in the future, will develop in him a sort of misogyny that will influence his attitudes towards women during the play. The excess of care and love he nurtures for his mother and the worry he has with his mother’s sexual life is somewhat unusual even nowadays, mostly in that period. Besides, some would also say that Hamlet is homosexual, which I believe not to be true. Firstly, because even being so kind to Horatio and treating him with such intimacy, we should remember that he had no siblings and he might consider his best friend as a brother. If we take nowadays relationships among siblings as a model it wouldn’t work, but in that period we can imagine that, it was most usual to treat a sibling with such love than we do in modern times. Just take Ophelia and Laertes, the way they kiss and hug each other is similar the way Hamlet speaks to Horatio. Another important point when analyzing Hamlet’s character is what really leads him to act the way he acts. He over thinks and make long speeches along all the play and none of these speeches have a direct affect in Hamlet’s action in what concerns in Action. He does not act effectively. His speeches are what he has of most rich in his character but they do not impress anyone but himself. While Hamlet speaks to himself, thinks, and analyzes the situation, Fortinbras marches towards Denmark to take the kingdom. Hamlet is a great example of a phlegmatic- melancholic temperament. He is so phlegmatic that he cannot even decide how to act with Ophelia, if he dates her, enjoys her or even ignores Ophelia, this leads her to a final destiny neither approved nor desired by anyone, the suicide.
Rate this Article:
Current: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s).
Article Tags: Analysis, Hamlet, Freudian Theory Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/psychology-articles/freudian-analysis-on-the-main-characters-of-hamlet-the-prince-of-denmark-172847.html About the Author:
Related ArticlesEssay on Hamlet’s Speech (act Ii/ Scene Ii) Literary Analysis Essay Rise of the Left - the Fall of Real Estate? Analysis of the Films Dancer in the Dark and Head-on Get Greater Clarity of Thought and Decisions With Mindmapping The Myths Of Network Utilization The Dangers of Defective Seat Belts Mixed Signals on Precious Metals: Finance Portfolio Research & Analysis for August 4 – 8, 2008 Got a Question? Ask.Ask the community a question about this article:Frequently Asked Questions Can you get cells off the top of the tongue to ... How does Hamlet's desire to seek revenge on his ... Hamlet Escrow analysis date Saliva test or buccal cell test? General Election results for candidates Latest Psychology ArticlesWhat Do You Do When Your Spouse Goes to Jail? Everybody Can Turn Into a Monster Viewing Aura Colors Through Biofeedback Got Persuasion? Adolescent Childbearing Factors as Determinant of Safe Motherhood in Abeokuta Metropolis of Ogun State, Nigeria What the Egyptian Sorcerers Said to Pharaoh Before He Has Killed Them? A Blind Doctor? The Power of not Accepting What You Experience as Reality More from Maria Perpétua PessôaWhy Students are Approved Without Deserving Essay on Hamlet’s Speech (act Ii/ Scene Ii) The Great Gatsby - Fitzgerald |
|||||||
|
Article Categories
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||