Remember Me
forgot your password?

Personal Attacks in Philosophical Discussions

Philosophical discussions generally consist of productive debate in which two or more people attempt to rationally argue for different sides of a question. They each try to think up and explain a logical argument in support of their position while constructively trying to offer logical rebuttals of the other person's position. Though called arguments, the philosophers generally have a lot of respect for each other and enjoy having the discussion in a friendly tone. In fact, it becomes very difficult to have a worthwhile philosophical discussion without a lot of respectfulness and friendliness.

Unfortunately, sometimes one person may use an ad hominem argument. An ad hominem argument consists of replying to a person's argument by merely attacking the character of the person making the argument. An ad hominem argument is also called a personal attack or an irrelevant insult. For example, if Joe claims that the sky is blue, Bob would be making an ad hominem argument if he responded by saying, "No, it isn't because you are an ugly moron."

An ad hominem is a fallacy, and it is illogical. Worse yet, it may cause the discussion to break down into an unproductive name-calling contest.

You may have trouble distinguishing an ad hominem argument from a non-fallaciously offensive statement. A claim or argument may not be an ad hominem argument just because somebody feels insulted or offended by it. You can figure out whether a statement is an ad hominem or not by asking yourself if the statement is truly relevant to the discussion. If the statement is evidence of the person's position about the topic, then it may not be an ad hominem even if it could be offensive. Nonetheless, if the statement just attacks the other person in the discussion, then it is an ad hominem. Generally, name-calling of any kind is an ad hominem. Additionally, saying that the other person is ignorant, stupid, or such will also almost always be an ad hominem.

You can avoid using ad hominem arguments by trying to stay on-topic in any discussion. Additionally, try to speak as nicely, politely, and respectfully as possible. If you constantly try to remain as nice and polite as possible, you will probably not slip up and make an ad hominem. To that end, avoid discussing anything while angry. If you feel angry or emotional, make sure to take extra care to speak or write in as nicely and respectfully of a tone as possible. Focus on making points only about the main topic, and do not comment on the other person's character or abilities (unless you wish to give them an honest compliment).

If someone calls you names or insults you, do not respond by doing the same. It is no less fallacious for you to return a personal attack than it was for them to make one. I find it most effective to just ignore insults in a philosophical discussion. If you try to mention the other person's ad hominem and reply to it, you will often end up getting into an off-topic and personal discussion. If you feel the need to reply to an ad hominem, simply and politely tell the person that the ad hominem remark is irrelevant. Talking about the fact that an off-topic remark is off-topic will bring you further off-topic. Just let it go and focus on the topic.

Calling someone a hypocrite is almost always an ad hominem fallcy. In fact, it is specifically referred to as an ad hominem tu quoque. It is fallacious. For example, if Mark claims that smoking cigarettes is wrong, and Mary tries to rebut it by accusing Mark of smoking cigarettes, Mary has probably made an ad hominem tu quoque fallacy. The fact that Mark smokes cigarettes does not disprove the claim that smoking cigarettes is wrong.

Also, calling the person who makes an argument biased is almost always an ad hominem fallacy. It is specifically referred to as an ad hominem circumstantial argument. Pointing out that someone has a reason to want a conclusion to be true is not a valid rebuttal to their argument.

Most importantly, you want to avoid making irrelevant insults. Do not call names. If you do, you are committing a fallacy, and you have greatly hindered the ability for the discussion to remain productive. Remember, the point of philosophical discussion is to have productive and constructive discussions about philosophical topics; it is not to have name-calling contests and insult each others' personal qualities.

Scott Hughes

Scott Hughes manages a Philosophy Forum at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com where you can discuss logic and other philosophical topics.

Rate this Article: 0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)
Print Email Re-Publish

Add new Comment



Captcha

  • Latest Psychology Articles
  • More from Scott Hughes

Rescuing Life from Anxiety Attacks with Panic Away

By: Laura Tran | 24/11/2009
Are you experiencing uneasiness and apprehension these past few days? If you are, you might be suffering from anxiety. Anxiety is a feeling of distress or uneasiness of mind which maybe caused by fear of danger or misfortune.

Panic Attacks: 2 Major Steps on How to Stop Anxiety Attacks

By: Laura Tran | 23/11/2009
Have you even been experiencing dizzy spells coupled with hot flushes? You may ignore this condition from time to time especially when you are feeling like this more often than not. But you are suffering anxiety panic attacks. Yes, you heard it right! Those are symptoms of an anxiety attack which can actually deteriorates you without noticing of having such condition.

Panic Away: Immediate Anxiety Relief

By: Laura Tran | 23/11/2009
Are you an anxiety victim? How did you manage it? Isn’t it hard to handle, which means you come to a point that you can not handle things anymore, including breathing. More often, anxiety comes together with hot flushes and dizzy spells. This feeling escalates to more complicated situation, leading into panic.

The Power of Subliminal Messages

By: Helping Psychology | 23/11/2009
Subliminal messages are messages directed at the subconscious mind, usually flashed on a television or movie screen at a rate too quick to be consciously perceived. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine exactly how the subconscious mind responds to such tactics; with surprising results.

Ways to Develop Your Mental Toughness

By: Andrew James | 22/11/2009
What is it that gives us mental strength? Well, some of it seems to be genetic. Mental health is well documented to be partially attributable to hereditary factors. Experience is also very important when it comes to mental strength. If we are happy with our current lifestyle, we also feel more confident in who we are. If you feel that you need to build up your mental toughness, there are a number of things you can do.

4 Ways to Success and Happiness

By: Ghyslain Lefebvre | 21/11/2009
A person looking for success and happiness is usually a person with self esteem and confidence issues. If you look around you, what do the successful and happy people have in common? Usually, you will find that they are self confident and have self esteem. Think about it, if you are suffering of low self esteem, do you think you can be happy? Do you think you can be successful? In most cases, the answer is NO. I have put together 4 easy steps....

Study Psychology- Just How much Self Study Is Required?

By: Peter Gitundu | 20/11/2009
Psychology is the study of human behavior. It seeks to establish why people behave the way they do in any given circumstance. The discipline covers a very wide range of material and is divided into many categories. For example, there are psychology studies that deal with medicine, environment, employment, human growth and development, among others.

5 Basic Cures for Anxiety and Panic

By: Shane | 18/11/2009
Anxiety, panic, and depression are very common, especially with the hectic pace of daily life. There are many ways to treat these psychological issues, and depending on personal preference, they may or may not be suitable for you.

Why Do People Fear Sex?

By: Scott Hughes | 31/03/2008 | Sexuality
Why do the people in our society tend to have such negative feelings towards sexuality? Why do so many cultures throughout the globe fear and hate sex?

Personal Attacks in Philosophical Discussions

By: Scott Hughes | 18/03/2008 | Psychology
An ad hominem argument consists of replying to a person's argument by merely attacking the character of the person making the argument.

What it Means for an Action to be Immoral

By: Scott Hughes | 07/03/2008 | Philosophy
What does it mean to call an action morally good or morally bad? Different people use those terms to mean very different things.

Philosophy of Politics - We Do not Need Prisons

By: Scott Hughes | 29/02/2008 | Politics
Do prisons really protect people from violence and victimization, or do prisons just make matters worse?

Political Philosophy - Why Governments Overspend

By: Scott Hughes | 21/02/2008 | Politics
Governments engage in many expensive endeavors that have little use or little effectiveness. Unfortunately, taxpayers have to foot the bill.

Corporate Crime Needs More Attention

By: Scott Hughes | 19/02/2008 | Politics
Corporations perform the most major forms of criminal victimization. Corporate crime inflicts far more damage on society than street crime.

Philosophy - Can Humans be Perfectly Happy?

By: Scott Hughes | 13/02/2008 | Psychology
Most people can probably tell you whether or not they feel happy. Nonetheless, the idea of happiness becomes very complex and interesting when we look at it from a philosophical perspective.

Submit Your Articles Free: Signup
Article Categories




Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved. (0.33, 6, w2)