Author of many Christian books, Phillip A. Ross has been a pastor for over 25 years. In 1998 he founded http://www.Pilgrim-Platform.org , which is loaded with information about historic Christianity. He published an exposition First Corinthians In 2008 that demonstrates the Apostle Paul's opposition to worldly Christianity. Paul turned the world upside down and Ross captures the action in Arsy Varsy -- Reclaiming the Gospel in First Corinthians.
Paul's marriage counseling in 1 Corinthians 7:6-17 is not a biblical command but a personal recommendation based on his knowledge of both Scripture and people. It was a recommendation based on his observations about the Corinthians and their church difficulties. And because it comes from Paul, who wrote much of the New Testament, it deserves serious consideration.
What is Paul's recommendation? He began by setting the context, "I wish that all were as I myself am. But each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and one of another" (1 Corinthians 7:7). From very early in Christian history this verse was considered to refer to Paul's married life. But in spite of the fact that the Roman Catholic Church believes that he was not married, the evidence is not conclusive. He may have been married, or he may have been a widower when he wrote these words. There really isn't enough evidence to establish anything certain about his state of marriage.
Nonetheless, we note that the traditional understanding has been that Paul was not married, and that his celibacy is here spoken of as a "gift." But if we examine both the context and the implications of this idea, we will find that Paul was not speaking about celibacy at all. The idea that Paul was saying that celibacy is a gift is absurd for a couple of reasons.
First, he wished that "all" people were like he was with regard to whatever he was talking about. Do you think that Paul really wished that all people were celibate? Ridiculous! We know that Paul clearly understood that the gifts of the Spirit were many and diverse, and that their diversity was a strength. Paul celebrated the diversity of spiritual gifts (Romans 12:6; 1 Corinthians 12:1-12, 30). So, for him to want all Christians to have the same gift is ridiculous.
Secondly, Paul surely knew that if all Christians were celibate, they would die out. The Essenes believed that Paul wanted all Christians to be celibate, and they actually died out. Paul was not stupid. Celibacy is a strategy of death, not life. This all suggests that Paul was not speaking in this verse about celibacy as a gift of the Spirit. This misunderstanding has been read into the verse, not taken from it. Even more, it suggests that he was not talking about celibacy as a lifestyle at all. Why not?
We have already determined that Paul was trying to correct a Greek misunderstanding that lead to confusion about the nature of biblical sexuality, that the Bible taught neither that all sex was okay, nor that all sex was to be avoided. Rather, the Bible teaches covenant responsibility with regard to sex -- covenant responsibility, or marriage. And celibacy is an avoidance of covenantal responsibility in as much as it is an avoidance of marriage. But don't jump to the false conclusion that this means that unmarried people are unfaithful. It does not mean that. The point is simply that the whole idea that Paul was talking about celibacy is a Greek misunderstanding about what the Bible teaches.
So, what did Paul mean? Actually, his words are not perfectly clear. He assumed that his audience knew exactly what he meant, and it is likely that they did. The subject that Paul was talking about was assumed rather than stated. But it is nonsense to think that he wished that all Christians were celibate. It just doesn't fit with anything that Paul taught anywhere, and especially not here in First Corinthians.
So, what was Paul talking about? Earlier Paul urged Christians to "be imitators of" him (1 Corinthians 4:16). In all likelihood, Paul was referring to this idea. It is more likely that Paul was referring to his commitment to Jesus Christ, to the fact that he had been waylaid by the Holy Spirit on the Road to Damascus, to the fact that he had been born again by the power and presence of the Holy Spirit, and to the fact that his regeneration had actually changed his life. This is what Paul wanted for every Christian. Paul was referring to the gift of regeneration, not celibacy. Paul wanted every Christian to be born again, to enter into a covenantal relationship with Jesus Christ and with the fellowship of saints.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A




11:11 Hosea & Isaiah 11 Akhenaten Obama God’s Coming
By: Gary Colin | 01/01/2010The Bible informs us that at the End of the Age, God will Come Again as Pharaoh the Serpent Scorpion/Dragon King (Baal/Beelzebub) to End the Age. The 11:11 and 12:12 Phenomenon is God's Calling Card (Awakening) for that Ending and the following Ascension. The Ascension is God Oneness (image of God). We are All One.
hinduism - its doctrine and peace
By: Subhasree Iyer | 01/01/2010This study examines the preachings of peace and the prevailing notions of peace among individuals in Hinduism, and further this paper claims to examine whether the notions of peace vary depending on the changing lifestyles of individuals as a function of occupation and advancements in life. The present study examines peace by outlining the core teachings of Hinduism, by which it is possible to demonstrate the way this religious tradition contributes towards working for peace.
Becoming Gods Masterpiece
By: Robert | 01/01/2010Christians accept Christ as their personal savior, confess and believe that he died and rose again for their sin and salvation. The gift through Christ is to have an opportunity to have a relationship with God unconditionally. If the gift is unconditional, why are Christians not experiencing the intimacy of God?
Spiritual Warfare Study: Truth Cries Out
By: catagory987 | 01/01/2010To understand the battle, we need to begin with acknowledging that we are in a war. Battles make up smaller components of the bigger picture. By definition, battles involve combat between two persons, between factions, between armies and they consist of any type of "extended contest, struggle, or controversy" (Webster-Merriam). As Christians, we are in a spiritual battle of some sort on a daily basis. In warfare, battles are fought on different fronts, for different reasons, and with varying degrees of intensity.
Grace - A Beautiful and Rich Word!
By: Stephen Stillman | 01/01/2010There are many beautiful and rich words in our Christian vocabulary that stimulate our minds and move our hearts. I think the word “grace” is one of the richest! If you truly understand “grace“, (the unmerited favor of God) it will excite you and pierce the heart of your faith.
How To Overcome A Negative Attitude
By: Eric Kotter | 31/12/2009This article offers some important effective solutions on overcoming depressed or negative thinking. The basic idea is to forget about yourself and serve others.
Consciousness Watching Consciousness
By: Nathan Scheer | 31/12/2009Answers are in the questions. Consciousness Watching Consciousness Do you see beauty and grandeur something more then the mass are you special to see this? privileged? what do you think this hologram of consciousness is trying to strive for in the big picture past any grand play part you think you in...
Eight Substantial Promises From Psalm 145 and 146 For Hurting People
By: Matthew Payne | 31/12/2009Most of us in times of trouble turn to friends and other people for help, comfort and advice. The word of God in the beginning of Psalm 146 tells us not to. The psalmist warns us: Psalm 146:3-4 (The Message) 3-9 Don't put your life in the hands of experts who know nothing...
Freedom From Stupidity
By: Phillip Ross | 29/12/2009 | ReligionChristian freedom is not unlimited freedom, but is dependent on the weaker brother. Christians must not engage their own freedoms if others will misunderstand or misinterpret our activity and get snagged in sin because of it.
God is Three In One
By: Phillip Ross | 19/12/2009 | ReligionWhile it is difficult to explain the Trinity, it is at the same time the most ordinary concept imaginable. Everyone intuitively understands that a thing can be both individual and corporate at the same time. Everyone intuitively knows what it means and uses such distinctions every day -- everyone, not just Christians.
Dead Men Walking
By: Phillip Ross | 11/12/2009 | ReligionEach person would have to decide for himself whether Paul spoke the truth, and whether or not to heed the truth that Paul spoke. Understanding what he was talking about was not sufficient, Paul called them to action, to flee from idolatry and to rely upon the Holy Spirit, who indwells believers. The Holy Spirit would evaluate the gospel that Paul taught and apply it to each believer's own life.
Soul Winning Strategy
By: Phillip Ross | 28/11/2009 | ReligionPaul went for the real gusto, Jesus Christ by becoming all things to all people. Christ calls us to do more than we think we can. He calls us all to exceed our own expectations because He has sent His Holy Spirit to dwell with His people to accomplish for them -- for us -- what we cannot of ourselves accomplish.
Gospel Expense
By: Phillip Ross | 24/11/2009 | ReligionThe presentation of the gospel must be freed from the encumbrances of the inane and petty dung that has captured church pulpits.
Necessary Freedom
By: Phillip Ross | 21/11/2009 | ReligionPaul was compelled to preach freely. So, out of necessity he preached freely. But which is it? Did Paul preach out of freedom or out of necessity? The answer, of course, is yes.
Pay The Piper
By: Phillip Ross | 14/11/2009 | ReligionIn spite of that rightful claim upon the Corinthian purse, Paul did not request or receive any such care. Why not? Because he did not want to give the impression that his ministry was motivated by monetary concerns. He did not want to be perceived as a hired gun that had come in to clean up the Corinthian church. He did not want to put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ.
Freedom's Limits
By: Phillip Ross | 14/11/2009 | ReligionAgainst the tide of unrestrained freedom, Paul argued for caution and restraint. Here and elsewhere Paul argued that freedom in Christ did not mean that Christians were free to do whatever they wanted to do, even if there was nothing ultimately wrong with some particular action. But rather, Christians were free in Christ to live in obedience to Christ, free to care for and model behavior suited to the least discerning of Christ's people.