For over 25 years Phillip A. Ross has been leading churches and writing many Christian books. In 1998 he founded http://www.Pilgrim-Platform.org , which is loaded with information about historic Christianity. He published a exposition First Corinthians In 2008 that demonstrates the Apostle Paul's opposition to worldly Christianity. Arsy Varsy -- Reclaiming the Gospel in First Corinthians, Ross's book, shows how Paul turned the world upside down.
The sense of verse 1 Corinthians 7:25 is the same as that of verse 1 Corinthians 7:12 in that Paul is not suggesting that people are free to disregard his advice, but rather that he is speaking about things that have not been covered in Scripture before.
The first concern is to discover who Paul is talking to and who he is talking about. The English Standard Version (ESV) translates the Greek word "parthenos" as betrothed. The ESV varies from the well-established translation as "virgins," and I see no good reason to translate the word as anything other than virgins.
But we also need to remember that the word "virgins" in Paul's day simply indicated unmarried females living in their father's home, women living under their father's family covenant. Paul, no doubt writing a letter to be read to a gathering of men, was simply turning his attention from the special case of mixed marriages to the general case of potential marriages -- young girls. It was as if Paul said, "Gentlemen, let us now consider your unmarried daughters." No doubt, some of these daughters were engaged to be married, others may have been involved in the various stages of the marital partner selection process. In those days the mate paring process began very early in the lives of children in contrast to common practices today. All young women would have been very interested in and concerned about their future roles as wives, mothers and homemakers.
Again, Paul reminded his audience that they would not find similar instructions anywhere else in Scripture because he was in the process of applying what he knew about Scripture, and about Christ's role as Messiah, to their present circumstances. Previously he had dealt with the new circumstance of mixed marriages. Here Paul was addressing another unusual circumstance that First Century Christians had been thrown into. That circumstance was not only the gospel explosion that was growing in the wake of persecution, but the fact of persecution itself.
Verse 26 mentions a "present necessity" (ESV) or "present distress" (King James Version). He was not talking about life as it normally unfolds, not about ordinary circumstances involved in raising a family, but the extraordinary or special circumstances that surrounded the impending destruction of Jerusalem in a.d. 70. Consequently, what he had to say to and about unmarried girls during that time of difficulty and increasing persecution of the church -- of Christians -- does not have the same application to Christians living during ordinary times, more peaceful times. He would go on to say that there would be great difficulty establishing a home and rearing a family during the period of great social upheaval and widespread persecution against Christians that was underway at the time.
He was also saying that the Christian faith is more important than family values. Ideally they work together, but when they don't, Christian faith trumps family values. Christians needed to be light on their feet, ready at a moment's notice to run and to hide from those who would threaten them with death. And having a family -- babies and children in tow -- would add to the stress and difficulties that would be involved. The same advice would apply to the Jews in Germany during the Nazi persecutions. It just wasn't a good time to try to establish a new Jewish family in Germany at that particular time in history.
Following his rule for all people in all churches (1 Corinthians 7:17), he recommended that people -- daughters -- remain in whatever state they were in. They should not draw attention to themselves by engaging in the legalities and/or public celebrations of marriage. They should avoid garnering public attention to themselves.
At the same time, Paul was well-aware that the complete avoidance of marriage was neither possible nor necessary. "But if you do marry, you have not sinned, and if a betrothed woman marries, she has not sinned" (1 Corinthians 7:28). He was not saying that it would be a sin to marry during such a time, only that marriage would be difficult, more difficult than usual because of the growing persecution. Verse 28 goes on to say, "Yet those who marry will have worldly troubles, and I would spare you that."
Exactly what kind of troubles did Paul mean? A more literal translation renders the phrase "trouble in the flesh." The Greek word is "sarx" and refers to the meaty covering of the human skeleton.
There are two biblical purposes for marriage: 1) companionship and 2) children. Paul was referring to children. He said that during the time of persecution, children would be an additional burden for Christian families. During times of persecution Christians would need to move quickly, run fast and hide quietly -- and children would add to the difficulties of doing these things. Paul was not speaking about sex, except that children are the natural product of sexual relations. He was not speaking about the experience of sex, but about the product -- children.
Paul was aware that this recommendation would be both difficult to understand and difficult to accomplish. He went on, "This is what I mean, brothers: the appointed time has grown very short" (1 Corinthians 7:29). What appointed time? The Greek word is "kairos," which literally means the "right or opportune moment." The ancient Greeks had two words for time, "chronos" and "kairos." The former refers to chronological or sequential time -- ordinary time, but the latter signifies "a time in between," a moment of undetermined duration in which something special happens. It refers to a period of time in which several dynamic events overlap to produce a particularly meaningful historical or personal event. The birth of Christ, for instance, was such a "kairos" moment in history.
In this case Paul was referring to the impending destruction of Jerusalem. He was aware of the winds of war -- the political rhetoric, the growing persecution and the movement of troops. It was in light of these things that Paul spoke to these new Christians, and to the fathers of young girls and their impending "prospects," to use a word from a former age. The winds of change were about to sweep the establishment of Judaism from the stage of history. War was immanent, Roman soldiers were gathering outside Jerusalem.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A




God’s Mind
By: Ashley Salas | 30/12/2009Well, you can say that again. Yep, she's superb. Dr. Allen, you have written many books, and by the way, I don't believe it. Well, I do a lot. You know the thing that I do that I enjoy more than anything else? I sponsor groups to the Holy Land and we are going to the Holy Land and each night I lecture on the life of Christ. So I'm going three times a year and I am taking groups and I lecture to them. And I am not sure, there's something about when you're there where he was and ...
The Foreigner woman in Bible versus Quran (6)
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 29/12/2009The Bible says that it is a great evil against God by marrying foreign women; such foreign women made King Solomon sinful. In the whole Quran, the term "foreign woman" is not mentioned therein; all women are equal in their rights regardless of race, color, location etc. On the other hand, in Islam, anyone says or believes that King Solomon was sinful (because of his 700 wives) is categorized as disbeliever and he will dwell in the Eternal Hell in the Afterlife.
Wherever I Go I See the Lord By Richard Roberts
By: Pierre Young | 29/12/2009John, somebody would say to me, Richard Roberts, what am I able to do? What am I able to do? Here is what you can do. You can keep your university opened. See, this isn't our university. It's your college. Practically everybody I know has asserted to me at some time,'I saw one of your students,' or'I heard from one of your graduates,' or'I went to some medical hospital and they were there,' or'I went into some dentist's office,' or'I went to, I was at some church,' or'One of t...
A Righteous Person Avails Much by Richard Roberts
By: Van Velasquez | 29/12/2009There are many others, Jerry, that are going to get honorary doctorates and I'm so glad that your name is among those this year and we respect you, we respect your better half and your folks, we honor your ministry, and we pray and believe that God has even larger things in store for you. Jerry, when you think about prayer, what comes to your mind? the very first thing that comes to my mind, Richard Roberts, because this is. I think this is what caused my prayer life to become ef...
Expecting a Signs by Richard Roberts
By: Otto Heath | 29/12/2009Pa, I just ask you in Jesus' name to break the power of fear over peoples's lives that is's making an attempt to stop them from going to the telephone and asking for that agreement in prayer. In the name of Jesus the Word announces that if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that ye shall ask, go to that phone and suggest that prayer partner to pray with you. They are ready to agree with you. Father, we many thanks for the contract and we thank you for the word ...
Jesus Who?
By: Thomas Jaytee | 29/12/2009Who is this one called Jesus? Will the real Jesus please stand? There are many impostors out there. Find out how you can know the real Jesus of scripture.
Freedom From Stupidity
By: Phillip Ross | 29/12/2009Christian freedom is not unlimited freedom, but is dependent on the weaker brother. Christians must not engage their own freedoms if others will misunderstand or misinterpret our activity and get snagged in sin because of it.
The Development of the Trinity Doctrine: the Beginning
By: Meredith Miller | 28/12/2009The New Testament church was founded on the belief in the absolute Oneness of God. Before the first century had ended, the New Testament had been written and the last of the apostles had died. Then it is seen two centuries later, the beginning of the fourth century, that the doctrine of God had changed from the belief of Oneness to a concept of Trinitarianism. This article looks at the events that brought about this different viewpoint of the Godhead.
Freedom From Stupidity
By: Phillip Ross | 29/12/2009 | ReligionChristian freedom is not unlimited freedom, but is dependent on the weaker brother. Christians must not engage their own freedoms if others will misunderstand or misinterpret our activity and get snagged in sin because of it.
God is Three In One
By: Phillip Ross | 19/12/2009 | ReligionWhile it is difficult to explain the Trinity, it is at the same time the most ordinary concept imaginable. Everyone intuitively understands that a thing can be both individual and corporate at the same time. Everyone intuitively knows what it means and uses such distinctions every day -- everyone, not just Christians.
Dead Men Walking
By: Phillip Ross | 11/12/2009 | ReligionEach person would have to decide for himself whether Paul spoke the truth, and whether or not to heed the truth that Paul spoke. Understanding what he was talking about was not sufficient, Paul called them to action, to flee from idolatry and to rely upon the Holy Spirit, who indwells believers. The Holy Spirit would evaluate the gospel that Paul taught and apply it to each believer's own life.
Soul Winning Strategy
By: Phillip Ross | 28/11/2009 | ReligionPaul went for the real gusto, Jesus Christ by becoming all things to all people. Christ calls us to do more than we think we can. He calls us all to exceed our own expectations because He has sent His Holy Spirit to dwell with His people to accomplish for them -- for us -- what we cannot of ourselves accomplish.
Gospel Expense
By: Phillip Ross | 24/11/2009 | ReligionThe presentation of the gospel must be freed from the encumbrances of the inane and petty dung that has captured church pulpits.
Necessary Freedom
By: Phillip Ross | 21/11/2009 | ReligionPaul was compelled to preach freely. So, out of necessity he preached freely. But which is it? Did Paul preach out of freedom or out of necessity? The answer, of course, is yes.
Pay The Piper
By: Phillip Ross | 14/11/2009 | ReligionIn spite of that rightful claim upon the Corinthian purse, Paul did not request or receive any such care. Why not? Because he did not want to give the impression that his ministry was motivated by monetary concerns. He did not want to be perceived as a hired gun that had come in to clean up the Corinthian church. He did not want to put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ.
Freedom's Limits
By: Phillip Ross | 14/11/2009 | ReligionAgainst the tide of unrestrained freedom, Paul argued for caution and restraint. Here and elsewhere Paul argued that freedom in Christ did not mean that Christians were free to do whatever they wanted to do, even if there was nothing ultimately wrong with some particular action. But rather, Christians were free in Christ to live in obedience to Christ, free to care for and model behavior suited to the least discerning of Christ's people.