Phillip A. Ross has been a pastor for over 25 years and is the author of many Christian books. He founded http://www.Pilgrim-Platform.org in 1998, which has a lot of information about historic Christianity. Demonstrating the Paul's opposition to worldly Christianity, he published an exposition First Corinthians in 2008. Arsy Varsy -- Reclaiming the Gospel in First Corinthians, Ross's book, shows how Paul turned the world upside down.
God "chose us in him before the foundation of the world" (Ephesians 1:4). We also know that the Holy Spirit is not awakened in God's people until they hear the Master's voice (John 5:25, 10:3, 10:27). Salvation is a matter of hearing the voice of the Lord, of hearing the gospel correctly. If it is not correctly understood by the preacher, it is not likely to be correctly communicated. And if it is not preached in its wholeness, in its fullness, then it is not God's message and cannot be correctly heard by slumbering saints.
Paul is saying that if either spouse is a Christian, the whole family will at some point have the gospel spoken in their hearing (presented to them). Not all will hear it efficaciously, of course, but at some point in such a family the gospel will be spoken in their hearing. And the speaking of the Word of God is sufficient to awaken God's people. Thus, a believing husband or wife is a sufficient means for the sanctification -- or we could say evangelization -- of his or her family.
And yet, there is another sense in which the believing spouse will sanctify his or her family. Salvation is not merely a matter of entering into a personal relationship with Jesus, but is a matter of entering into a covenantal relationship with God, and with His people. Our covenantal relationships are a legal relationships by definition. A covenant is always a legal arrangement.
God's law was violated by Adam at the Fall and restitution was made by Jesus at the cross. Sin is not a matter of metaphysics or of being. It is not some physical, mental or intellectual lack. Adam lacked nothing physical, mental or intellectual that kept him from living in obedience to God's Word. Rather, sin is a moral issue. It is a matter of the will and of the spirit, which means that salvation does not impart anything physical, mental or intellectual that turns an unbeliever into a believer.
Rather, salvation is a matter of the change of one's will, one's heart, one's spirit, from a spirit of willful rebellion against God's Word -- God's law -- to a spirit of willing obedience. Sin is legally defined by God as criminal because of Adam's sin and our willing complicity in the cause and continuation of sin. And salvation is a matter of being legally restored to full citizenship in God's Kingdom by the propitiation of Christ on the cross and our willing complicity in the cause of Christ, which is to bring honor and glory to God and to His Word.
The issue with regard to the legality of the covenant pertains to the legal status of ownership and the authority and comprehensiveness of God's covenant. God's covenant applies to all of life, every thought is to be held captive to Christ (2 Corinthians 10:5), every tongue is to confess and every knee is to bow to Jesus Christ (Romans 14:11).
We have already seen that the husband owns the wife and the wife owns the husband, and both are owned by God. The ownership of each spouse by the other implies that each is subsumed under the legal ownership of the other. God's covenant applies to everything a person owns. Thus, the ownership of the husband by the wife (as Paul notes in this verse) brings the husband under the authority structure of God's covenant. The same applies to the children of the marriage. The issue is not whether the spouse and children recognize that they are under God's covenant. The issue is the efficacy of the covenant, the power of God to apply His covenant to people whether or not they acknowledge or even recognize it. The issue is God's power and sovereignty.
Paul goes on in verse 15, "But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace." In essence Paul is saying that if the unbelieving partner walks away from a marriage because the other person has become a Christian, then the one who walked away is not rejecting the believing spouse, but he or she is rejecting God. The rejecting spouse may argue that the believing spouse has changed since becoming a Christian, that the believing spouse is no longer the same person that he or she married -- and we hope that that would be true! Nonetheless, it is a rejection of Christ and Christianity, not a personal rejection of the believing spouse.
Having rejected God, then, the unbelieving spouse who chooses to end the marriage should be allowed to do so. And the believing spouse should be at peace with the situation because it is God's will that irredeemable people not be yoked to believers. Let it be so. God has called believers to be at peace about it.
Verse 16 affirms that we cannot read the hearts of other people. We don't know whether our efforts will contribute to the salvation of a person or not. Salvation belongs to the Lord. So we must be at peace with providence, trusting in the sovereignty and wisdom of God in all things. Verses 17-24 conclude this thought with a general rule that Paul applied to all people in all churches. Because this applies to all Christians in all churches it is important.
"Only let each person lead the life that the Lord has assigned to him, and to which God has called him. This is my rule in all the churches. Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision. For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God. Each one should remain in the condition in which he was called. Were you a slave when called? Do not be concerned about it. But if you can gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity. For he who was called in the Lord as a slave is a freedman of the Lord. Likewise he who was free when called is a slave of Christ. You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men. So, brothers, in whatever condition each was called, there let him remain with God" (1 Corinthians 7:17-24).
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A




The Stress Of Christmas
By: Michael A. Verdicchio | 31/12/2009In the mail, you receive a Christmas card from someone who was not on your list of cards that you sent. Oh, no! Now what do you do? It's too late. If you do send them a card they won't get it in time. This is but a small part of what I call, "the stress of Christmas."
What Were the Events That Led to the Council of Nicea?
By: Meredith Miller | 30/12/2009When it comes to church history, one topic that arises in discussion, is the Council of Nicea. However, this article was written not about the council meeting itself, but about the happenings that brought about the need to have such a meeting.
The God in whom I Believe!
By: Said Benrida | 30/12/2009The God in whom I believe has created an infinite universe which is growing at an infinite speed. The God in whom I believe has an unlimited control over us, he doesn't need us.
God’s Mind
By: Ashley Salas | 30/12/2009Well, you can say that again. Yep, she's superb. Dr. Allen, you have written many books, and by the way, I don't believe it. Well, I do a lot. You know the thing that I do that I enjoy more than anything else? I sponsor groups to the Holy Land and we are going to the Holy Land and each night I lecture on the life of Christ. So I'm going three times a year and I am taking groups and I lecture to them. And I am not sure, there's something about when you're there where he was and ...
The Foreigner woman in Bible versus Quran (6)
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 29/12/2009The Bible says that it is a great evil against God by marrying foreign women; such foreign women made King Solomon sinful. In the whole Quran, the term "foreign woman" is not mentioned therein; all women are equal in their rights regardless of race, color, location etc. On the other hand, in Islam, anyone says or believes that King Solomon was sinful (because of his 700 wives) is categorized as disbeliever and he will dwell in the Eternal Hell in the Afterlife.
Wherever I Go I See the Lord By Richard Roberts
By: Pierre Young | 29/12/2009John, somebody would say to me, Richard Roberts, what am I able to do? What am I able to do? Here is what you can do. You can keep your university opened. See, this isn't our university. It's your college. Practically everybody I know has asserted to me at some time,'I saw one of your students,' or'I heard from one of your graduates,' or'I went to some medical hospital and they were there,' or'I went into some dentist's office,' or'I went to, I was at some church,' or'One of t...
A Righteous Person Avails Much by Richard Roberts
By: Van Velasquez | 29/12/2009There are many others, Jerry, that are going to get honorary doctorates and I'm so glad that your name is among those this year and we respect you, we respect your better half and your folks, we honor your ministry, and we pray and believe that God has even larger things in store for you. Jerry, when you think about prayer, what comes to your mind? the very first thing that comes to my mind, Richard Roberts, because this is. I think this is what caused my prayer life to become ef...
Expecting a Signs by Richard Roberts
By: Otto Heath | 29/12/2009Pa, I just ask you in Jesus' name to break the power of fear over peoples's lives that is's making an attempt to stop them from going to the telephone and asking for that agreement in prayer. In the name of Jesus the Word announces that if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that ye shall ask, go to that phone and suggest that prayer partner to pray with you. They are ready to agree with you. Father, we many thanks for the contract and we thank you for the word ...
God is Three In One
By: Phillip Ross | 19/12/2009 | ReligionWhile it is difficult to explain the Trinity, it is at the same time the most ordinary concept imaginable. Everyone intuitively understands that a thing can be both individual and corporate at the same time. Everyone intuitively knows what it means and uses such distinctions every day -- everyone, not just Christians.
Dead Men Walking
By: Phillip Ross | 11/12/2009 | ReligionEach person would have to decide for himself whether Paul spoke the truth, and whether or not to heed the truth that Paul spoke. Understanding what he was talking about was not sufficient, Paul called them to action, to flee from idolatry and to rely upon the Holy Spirit, who indwells believers. The Holy Spirit would evaluate the gospel that Paul taught and apply it to each believer's own life.
Soul Winning Strategy
By: Phillip Ross | 28/11/2009 | ReligionPaul went for the real gusto, Jesus Christ by becoming all things to all people. Christ calls us to do more than we think we can. He calls us all to exceed our own expectations because He has sent His Holy Spirit to dwell with His people to accomplish for them -- for us -- what we cannot of ourselves accomplish.
Gospel Expense
By: Phillip Ross | 24/11/2009 | ReligionThe presentation of the gospel must be freed from the encumbrances of the inane and petty dung that has captured church pulpits.
Necessary Freedom
By: Phillip Ross | 21/11/2009 | ReligionPaul was compelled to preach freely. So, out of necessity he preached freely. But which is it? Did Paul preach out of freedom or out of necessity? The answer, of course, is yes.
Pay The Piper
By: Phillip Ross | 14/11/2009 | ReligionIn spite of that rightful claim upon the Corinthian purse, Paul did not request or receive any such care. Why not? Because he did not want to give the impression that his ministry was motivated by monetary concerns. He did not want to be perceived as a hired gun that had come in to clean up the Corinthian church. He did not want to put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ.
Freedom's Limits
By: Phillip Ross | 14/11/2009 | ReligionAgainst the tide of unrestrained freedom, Paul argued for caution and restraint. Here and elsewhere Paul argued that freedom in Christ did not mean that Christians were free to do whatever they wanted to do, even if there was nothing ultimately wrong with some particular action. But rather, Christians were free in Christ to live in obedience to Christ, free to care for and model behavior suited to the least discerning of Christ's people.