Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution

<h1>Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution</h1>Author: <a title="Joel Kontinen" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/joel-kontinen/44216.htm">Joel Kontinen</a> Science journals have featured countless stories about the evolution of the human brain. Scientists are puzzled since humans have much bigger brains than any other species. Their suggested explanations have often been mutually exclusive, for instance the old text book explanation relied on eating meat but a few years ago an article New Scientist, a popular science magazine, suggested that eating starch was the secret of brain growth. But both explanations fail to answer why other meat or starch eating species do not have big brains.

At the recent AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) annual meeting in Boston, Richard Lewontin, a distinguished biology professor at Harvard University, acknowledged that stories about human brain evolution have not been based on facts. Reporting on the meeting for the journal Science, Michael Balter quoted Lewontin as saying, “We are missing the fossil record of human cognition, so we make up stories." The title of Balter’s article seems to be an admission of sorts: “How Human Intelligence Evolved--Is It Science or ‘Paleofantasy’?”

According to professor Lewontin, it is fantasy. Lewontin suggests that there is much cause for pessimism in the study of human origins. Science reporter James Randerson of Britain’s Guardian newspaper was even more brunt, saying, “We know nothing about brain evolution.” Randerson went on to summarise Lewontin’s reasons for pessimism. “The handful of hominid fossils stretching back 4m years or so” cannot tell us whether any of them were our ancestors. We “do not have the have the faintest idea what the cranial capacity [of a fossil hominid] means”. Moreover, we do not even know which hominids walked upright and which did not.

Lewontin is well-known for his outspokenness. In 1997 he wrote in The New York Review of Books that scientists choose to make up “unsubstantiated just-so stories” because they “have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism… Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”

Obviously, the scientific community cannot ignore Lewinton’s recent conclusions. If the ruling paradigm (naturalism or the view that nature is all there is) leads us into a blind alley, might there be something wrong with it?

About the Author: I am a translator and novelist currently living in Finland. I have an MA in translation studies and a BA in Bible and theology. I like to keep up-to-date with science and origins issues and write about them in my blogs. 
 
<a href="http://joelkontinen.blogspot.com/"> blog </a>Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/science-articles/harvard-biologist-admits-we-know-nothing-about-brain-evolution-340711.html" title="Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution">Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution</a>

Science journals have featured countless stories about the evolution of the human brain. Scientists are puzzled since humans have much bigger brains than any other species. Their suggested explanations have often been mutually exclusive, for instance the old text book explanation relied on eating meat but a few years ago an article New Scientist, a popular science magazine, suggested that eating starch was the secret of brain growth. But both explanations fail to answer why other meat or starch eating species do not have big brains.

At the recent AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) annual meeting in Boston, Richard Lewontin, a distinguished biology professor at Harvard University, acknowledged that stories about human brain evolution have not been based on facts. Reporting on the meeting for the journal Science, Michael Balter quoted Lewontin as saying, “We are missing the fossil record of human cognition, so we make up stories." The title of Balter’s article seems to be an admission of sorts: “How Human Intelligence Evolved--Is It Science or ‘Paleofantasy’?”

According to professor Lewontin, it is fantasy. Lewontin suggests that there is much cause for pessimism in the study of human origins. Science reporter James Randerson of Britain’s Guardian newspaper was even more brunt, saying, “We know nothing about brain evolution.” Randerson went on to summarise Lewontin’s reasons for pessimism. “The handful of hominid fossils stretching back 4m years or so” cannot tell us whether any of them were our ancestors. We “do not have the have the faintest idea what the cranial capacity [of a fossil hominid] means”. Moreover, we do not even know which hominids walked upright and which did not.

Lewontin is well-known for his outspokenness. In 1997 he wrote in The New York Review of Books that scientists choose to make up “unsubstantiated just-so stories” because they “have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism… Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”

Obviously, the scientific community cannot ignore Lewinton’s recent conclusions. If the ruling paradigm (naturalism or the view that nature is all there is) leads us into a blind alley, might there be something wrong with it?

I am a translator and novelist currently living in Finland. I have an MA in translation studies and a BA in Bible and theology. I like to keep up-to-date with science and origins issues and write about them in my blogs.

blog

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Related Articles
Related Q&A

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/science-articles/harvard-biologist-admits-we-know-nothing-about-brain-evolution-340711.html

Article Tags: Homo Sapiens, Hominids, Brain Evolution

Latest Science Articles
More from Joel Kontinen

Why outsource your MSDS authoring?

By: Editor123 | 02/07/2009
Many chemical manufacturers and distributors debate whether or not to author their SDSs and MSDSs in house, or instead outsource the process to an MSDS authoring company. There are several advantages to outsourcing your MSDS authoring.

What Is The Best Beginner Telescope?

By: Kozsun Huseyin | 01/07/2009
Are you considering getting into backyard astronomy? Even though there is much good with Hubble Space Telescope images, there is nothing like having your own telescope to view the heavens.

Titanium Recycling- Basic Information

By: deepa singh | 30/06/2009
Basic Information(Ti): Titanium is a chemical element with the symbol Ti and atomic number 22. Sometimes called the “space age metal”, it has a low density and is a strong, lustrous, corrosion-resistant (including to sea water, aqua regia and chlorine) transition metal with a silver color.

Aliens, UFOs, Alien Abductions, Close Encounters - Chance or No-chance?

By: Andy Chains | 30/06/2009
The Drake Equation makes various assumptions to allow an estimate to be made of the number of planets in the universe that might have life. One of the key assumptions is that life is very likely to arise on any earth-like planet. However, this assumption can be seriously questioned - and its challenger is Darwin's Theory of Evolution...

Attending trade shows to find an adhesive solution

By: Rebecca Wilmot | 30/06/2009
Trade shows of every size represent opportunities to stay informed about developments in many areas of business and to connect with new supply sources. Equally valuable is the chance to brainstorm with professionals that are willing to think outside the box in order to grow their business. Adhesive manufacturers can be found at shows targeted to Manufacturing and Assembly, but they can also be found at Fastener shows displaying non-mechanical alternatives to joining components.

Magnetically induced transparency of circularly polarized laser beam in plasmas

By: Sonu Sen | 28/06/2009
For the intensities greater than 1018 W/cm2, circularly polarized radiation can propagate in electron plasma whose density is greater than the critical density. A strong flow of relativistic electrons, axially co-moving with the pulse arises. At this point the, the magnetic field of the electromagnetic wave becomes important. In the present paper, three regimes of propagation of circularly polarized laser beam in magnetized plasma are identified.

Learn The Process Of Evolution

By: nlwest21 | 28/06/2009
Evolution is a theory on how the world began. It is based totally on science - but many people still remain skeptics of it.

25 Facts About Animals

By: Javan McCabe | 25/06/2009
1. A group of skunks are known as an odor 2. The smallest carnivore in Africa is the dwarf mongoose, a relative of the meerkat 3. Male seahorses produce offspring 4. The word 'panda' comes from the Nepalese word 'nigalya ponya' meaning bamboo eater 5. A crocodile's young is known as a crocklet

Oldest Hebrew Text Found

By: Joel Kontinen | 13/11/2008 | Science
Archaeologists have found the earliest known Hebrew text. Said to be the most important archaeological find in Israel since the Dead Sea Scrolls, the new discovery is 3000 years old and supports the biblical account of King David.

Don't Hurt the Feelings of Your Hibiscus!

By: Joel Kontinen | 05/10/2008 | Science
A study on plant dignity won the 2008 Ig Noble peace prize. The study claimed that plants might posess inherent dignity

Elephants are Good at Mathematics

By: Joel Kontinen | 23/09/2008 | Science
Elephants are exceptionally clever at mathematics, especially if they benefit from it. They are more actually adept at counting apples than apes are.

Dino-era Bird Found in China

By: Joel Kontinen | 11/05/2008 | Science
The fossil of a modern-looking bird that lived during the dinosaur era has been found in China. This discovery brings an interesting perspective into a lively debate that has been brewing in the scientific community for several years.

Moses on Drugs: a Brave New Theory or Extremely Bad Science?

By: Joel Kontinen | 08/03/2008 | Science
t has become easy to predict when Easter is coming even without looking at a calendar. Each year we get to hear about some new astounding discovery and the authors of the sensational find get their moment of fame and occasionally also some extra money. This Easter an Israeli scholar presents a bizarre hypothesis on Moses.

Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution

By: Joel Kontinen | 24/02/2008 | Science
Science journals have featured countless stories about the evolution of the human brain. Scientists are puzzled since humans have much bigger brains than any other species. Their suggested explanations have often been mutually exclusive. Now a Harvard biologist says all such explanations have been bogus.

Cavemen Were Smarter Than We Thought

By: Joel Kontinen | 11/02/2008 | Science
Science textbooks usually present cavemen as very primitive people who were barely able to utter a few monosyllables. However, as additional data about stone age men is unearthed, the picture becomes considerably more complex.