Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution

<h1>Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution</h1>Author: <a title="Joel Kontinen" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/joel-kontinen/44216.htm">Joel Kontinen</a> Science journals have featured countless stories about the evolution of the human brain. Scientists are puzzled since humans have much bigger brains than any other species. Their suggested explanations have often been mutually exclusive, for instance the old text book explanation relied on eating meat but a few years ago an article New Scientist, a popular science magazine, suggested that eating starch was the secret of brain growth. But both explanations fail to answer why other meat or starch eating species do not have big brains.

At the recent AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) annual meeting in Boston, Richard Lewontin, a distinguished biology professor at Harvard University, acknowledged that stories about human brain evolution have not been based on facts. Reporting on the meeting for the journal Science, Michael Balter quoted Lewontin as saying, “We are missing the fossil record of human cognition, so we make up stories." The title of Balter’s article seems to be an admission of sorts: “How Human Intelligence Evolved--Is It Science or ‘Paleofantasy’?”

According to professor Lewontin, it is fantasy. Lewontin suggests that there is much cause for pessimism in the study of human origins. Science reporter James Randerson of Britain’s Guardian newspaper was even more brunt, saying, “We know nothing about brain evolution.” Randerson went on to summarise Lewontin’s reasons for pessimism. “The handful of hominid fossils stretching back 4m years or so” cannot tell us whether any of them were our ancestors. We “do not have the have the faintest idea what the cranial capacity [of a fossil hominid] means”. Moreover, we do not even know which hominids walked upright and which did not.

Lewontin is well-known for his outspokenness. In 1997 he wrote in The New York Review of Books that scientists choose to make up “unsubstantiated just-so stories” because they “have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism… Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”

Obviously, the scientific community cannot ignore Lewinton’s recent conclusions. If the ruling paradigm (naturalism or the view that nature is all there is) leads us into a blind alley, might there be something wrong with it?

About the Author: I am a translator and novelist currently living in Finland. I have an MA in translation studies and a BA in Bible and theology. I like to keep up-to-date with science and origins issues and write about them in my blogs. 
 
<a href="http://joelkontinen.blogspot.com/"> blog </a>Article Source: <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/">ArticlesBase.com</a> - <a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/science-articles/harvard-biologist-admits-we-know-nothing-about-brain-evolution-340711.html" title="Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution">Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution</a>

Science journals have featured countless stories about the evolution of the human brain. Scientists are puzzled since humans have much bigger brains than any other species. Their suggested explanations have often been mutually exclusive, for instance the old text book explanation relied on eating meat but a few years ago an article New Scientist, a popular science magazine, suggested that eating starch was the secret of brain growth. But both explanations fail to answer why other meat or starch eating species do not have big brains.

At the recent AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) annual meeting in Boston, Richard Lewontin, a distinguished biology professor at Harvard University, acknowledged that stories about human brain evolution have not been based on facts. Reporting on the meeting for the journal Science, Michael Balter quoted Lewontin as saying, “We are missing the fossil record of human cognition, so we make up stories." The title of Balter’s article seems to be an admission of sorts: “How Human Intelligence Evolved--Is It Science or ‘Paleofantasy’?”

According to professor Lewontin, it is fantasy. Lewontin suggests that there is much cause for pessimism in the study of human origins. Science reporter James Randerson of Britain’s Guardian newspaper was even more brunt, saying, “We know nothing about brain evolution.” Randerson went on to summarise Lewontin’s reasons for pessimism. “The handful of hominid fossils stretching back 4m years or so” cannot tell us whether any of them were our ancestors. We “do not have the have the faintest idea what the cranial capacity [of a fossil hominid] means”. Moreover, we do not even know which hominids walked upright and which did not.

Lewontin is well-known for his outspokenness. In 1997 he wrote in The New York Review of Books that scientists choose to make up “unsubstantiated just-so stories” because they “have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism… Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”

Obviously, the scientific community cannot ignore Lewinton’s recent conclusions. If the ruling paradigm (naturalism or the view that nature is all there is) leads us into a blind alley, might there be something wrong with it?

I am a translator and novelist currently living in Finland. I have an MA in translation studies and a BA in Bible and theology. I like to keep up-to-date with science and origins issues and write about them in my blogs.

blog

Rate this Article:

0 / 5 stars - 0 vote(s)

Re-Publish

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/science-articles/harvard-biologist-admits-we-know-nothing-about-brain-evolution-340711.html

Article Tags: Homo Sapiens, Hominids, Brain Evolution

Related Articles
Related Q&A

Latest Science Articles
More from Joel Kontinen

Unconventional Renewable Energies

By: Andrew Spark | 11/11/2009
Hydroelectric power captures the energy of moving water. Large-scale hydroelectric plants are a mature technology and already well established around the world. There is, however, ongoing research into mini-hydro, which can be installed on a home or village basis. Any electricity produced this way which is not used can be sold back to the grid.

What Is Renewable Energy

By: Andrew Spark | 11/11/2009
Renewable energy is a source of power which is replenished naturally, such as solar, wind or biomass. In 2005, about 13% of global primary, or raw, energy comes from renewables, of which most is from traditional biomass like wood-burning.

What Is Climate Change

By: Andrew Spark | 11/11/2009
Climate refers to the average weather experienced over a long period of time, and includes temperature, wind and rainfall patterns. The climate of the Earth has changed many times during the planet’s history in response to a range of natural causes, but it is now changing rapidly due to human influence.

Which is the Best DAT Program?

By: Dr. Wayne Huang | 11/11/2009
Rapid Learning System uses the three components above with rich-media with focus on concept understanding and problem solving. Any DAT course has 24x rich-media videos, 24x problem drills and 24x cheat sheets.

Climate Change, an old story?

By: Geromec | 10/11/2009
When did this climate change and global warming started? At first, scientists projected that something that the earth today has been compared to time bomb. Some explained it by using destructive analogy. These views are still lasting, but there are also views contradicting from the first. That the earth is the same with our body mechanism which has the capability fight foreign elements like flu, cancer and any type sickness. That the earth has its own defensive mechanism to fight this pheno

Science Questions & Answers

By: isfaq | 10/11/2009
10 Laboratory Apparatus And Their Use? Give at least 10 laboratory apparatus and their uses Beaker barrette clay triangle wire gauze test tube forceps graduate cylinder Graduated pipette Condenser Crucible....

Fast Track DAT Study in Biology

By: Dr. Wayne Huang | 10/11/2009
The rich-media Rapid Learning Series by Rapid Learning Center is a break-through learning system with scientific teaching method coupling with rich-media visualization and expert narration.

The Powerful DAT Review in Organic Chemistry

By: Dr. Wayne Huang | 09/11/2009
The rich-media Rapid Learning Series by Rapid Learning Center is a break-through learning system with scientific teaching method coupling with rich-media visualization and expert narration. In organic chemistry, it breaks down the entire course into 24 chapters, one chapter at a time, one hour per chapter in total of 24 hours.

Oldest Hebrew Text Found

By: Joel Kontinen | 13/11/2008 | Science
Archaeologists have found the earliest known Hebrew text. Said to be the most important archaeological find in Israel since the Dead Sea Scrolls, the new discovery is 3000 years old and supports the biblical account of King David.

Don't Hurt the Feelings of Your Hibiscus!

By: Joel Kontinen | 05/10/2008 | Science
A study on plant dignity won the 2008 Ig Noble peace prize. The study claimed that plants might posess inherent dignity

Elephants are Good at Mathematics

By: Joel Kontinen | 23/09/2008 | Science
Elephants are exceptionally clever at mathematics, especially if they benefit from it. They are more actually adept at counting apples than apes are.

Dino-era Bird Found in China

By: Joel Kontinen | 11/05/2008 | Science
The fossil of a modern-looking bird that lived during the dinosaur era has been found in China. This discovery brings an interesting perspective into a lively debate that has been brewing in the scientific community for several years.

Hobbits Becoming More Human

By: Joel Kontinen | 09/03/2008 | Science
A new study suggests that the hobbits, a diminutive people whose remains were found on the Indonesian island of Flores in 2003 and 2004, were real humans after all. They were originally classified as Homo floresiensis, a species distinct from Homo sapiens but the dispute about their status has never abated. It now seems that their small stature is due to a lack of iodine

Harvard Biologist Admits: We Know Nothing About Brain Evolution

By: Joel Kontinen | 24/02/2008 | Science
Science journals have featured countless stories about the evolution of the human brain. Scientists are puzzled since humans have much bigger brains than any other species. Their suggested explanations have often been mutually exclusive. Now a Harvard biologist says all such explanations have been bogus.

Cavemen Were Smarter Than We Thought

By: Joel Kontinen | 11/02/2008 | Science
Science textbooks usually present cavemen as very primitive people who were barely able to utter a few monosyllables. However, as additional data about stone age men is unearthed, the picture becomes considerably more complex.