Professor Dr. Ibrahim Khalil
Prof. of Clinical and Chemical Pathology,
Head of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control Unit,
Ain-Shams University., Cairo, Egypt.
And,
President of the Egyptian Society of Inventors.
Member of the Egyptian union of Writers
The Bible says that the Rabbit is a ruminant animal while the sciences say that the Rabbit is not a ruminant animal.
The Quran does not mention the Rabbit by name but it gives an Arabic word of four characters that can be applicable for man, animals, birds, plants and microbes.
The Rabbit in the Bible:
RABBITS ERRONEOUSLY CALLED RUMINANTS IN THE BIBLE
The rabbits are mentioned in the Old Testament in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. The rabbit does not mentioned in the New Testament.
The quotes herein are from the New International Version.
Leviticus 11:3-6:
‘Whatever divides the hoof, and is cloven-footed, chewing the cud, among the animals, that you shall eat.
‘Only, you shall not eat these of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the hoof: the camel, for he chews the cud but does not divide the hoof; he is unclean to you.
And the rock badger, because he chews the cud, but does not divide the hoof; he is unclean to you.
‘And the hare, because he chews the cud but does not divide the hoof; he is unclean to you.’
Deuteronomy 14:6-8:
You may eat any animal that has a split hoof divided in two and that chews the cud.
However, of those that chew the cud or that have a split hoof completely divided you may not eat the camel, the rabbit or the Coney. Although they chew the cud, they do not have a split hoof; they are ceremonially unclean for you.
The pig is also unclean; although it has a split hoof, it does not chew the cud. You are not to eat their meat or touch their carcasses.
These verses made the digestive process of the rabbit an object of a hot theological discussion?
In Hebrew "arnebeth" means rabbit
Also, in Arabic "arnab" means a male rabbit and "arnabat" means a female rabbit.
The Hebrew words are: 'ALEH GERAH, lit,
These Hebrew words mean 'Gerah the cud' and translated to 'chew the cud'
The exact or the true translation should be: "raising up what has been swallowed")? Or may be translated to 'bring up the cud'
Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, and then eat it again. The description given in Leviticus is inaccurate. Rabbits do eat their own dung; they do not bring anything up and chew on it.
The Bible says that the hare chews the cud, but the scientists claim that the Bible is in error on this point.
Furthermore, some skeptics claim that since the Bible contains this error, it is not the Word of God and cannot be taken seriously on any other points either.
Animals that ‘chew the cud’ are called ruminants. They hardly chew their food when first eaten, but swallow it into a special stomach where the food is partially digested. Then it is regurgitated, chewed again, and swallowed into a different stomach. Animals which do this include cows, sheep and goats, and they all have four stomachs. Coneys and rabbits are not ruminants.
Animals which do this include cows, sheep, goats, deer, and giraffes; they all have four stomachs and chewing a cud consisting of regurgitated, partially digested food." Coneys and rabbits are not ruminants.
The rabbit does not fit this definition, and trying to classify it as a ruminant is not accepted.
Biblical scholars refuse to see this statement as a biological error that incorrectly classifies the rabbit as a ruminant or cud-chewer.
When defining the rabbit, most of the Bible Dictionaries say that the habit of the rabbit is to grind its teeth and move its jaw as if it actually chewed the cud. But, like the Coney, it is not a ruminant with four stomachs, but a rodent like the squirrel, rat, etc. Moses speaks of it according to appearance. It is interdicted because, though apparently chewing the cud, it did not divide the hoof."
Examples of what is said about the rabbit in some Bible Dictionaries
Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, page 525:
"The assertion that the hare is a ruminant is contrary to fact. Some movements of the mouth and jaws have been erroneously interpreted as cud-chewing."
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, page 616:
"This animal is mentioned only in the lists of unclean animals in Leviticus and Deuteronomy...The hare and the Coney are not ruminants, but might be supposed to be from their habit of almost continuously moving their jaws."
Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible, 2000 edition, page 552:
"Because it "chews the cud" but "does not have divided hoofs," the hare is classified as an unclean animal (Lev. 11:6; Deut. 14:7). Actually, it is not a ruminant but may have appeared as such to ancient observers because of its constant chewing movements."
A Biblical scholar said:
"I don't believe the rabbit chews the cud in the modern technical sense. It simply makes a chewing motion that from an observational point of view can be associated with other animals that do chew the cud in the technical sense."
Another intellectual claims that "the Hebrew "arnebeth" means an unidentified animal which is rendered hare or rabbit, perhaps incorrectly". His opinion is far beyond the reality!
Other Biblical academic said:
"Does the rabbit ruminate? True ruminants normally have four stomachs, and that which has been worked over in these stomachs is regurgitated into the mouth when it is ready to be chewed again. In this technical sense neither the rabbit nor the hare can be called ruminants, but they do give the appearance of chewing their cud in the same way ruminants do."
Herein the conclusion of what the Biblical researchers say:
The Rabbits do give the appearance of chewing their cud in the same way ruminants do.
The Rabbits are not ruminants, but might be supposed to be from their habit of almost continuously moving their jaws.
The Rabbits are not ruminants but may have appeared as such to ancient observers because of their constant chewing movements.
Now the question is: what is the relation between the Word of God and the ancient observers who assumed that the Rabbits are cud-chewing due to its habit of continuously moving its jaws? And who wrote the Bible those observers or the God?
The Rabbit in the Quran:
The rabbit by name is not mentioned in the Quran.
However, the Quran gives an Arabic word of four characters that can be applicable for man, animals, birds, plants and microbes.
You will read about this comprehensive word very soon.
- Related Videos
- Related Articles
- Ask / Related Q&A
- Is the Arabic Word for God Truly Allah?
- Allah Does not Love (24) the Sinful Traitor
- Not in Bible But in Quran (19); King Solomon Spoke Arabic
- Allah is Asking You This Question (12) Has Muhammad Invented the Quran? Then Bring Ten Surah
- Allah is Asking You This Question (22) Do They Say He Forged the Quran? Bring Then a Surah Like Unto it
- Allah Challenges Mankind by Producing 10 Words
- This is Allah (34) Allah Does not Love Those Who are Excessive and Prodigal
- Lord in English Versus Rab in Arabic




Anger Repressed For a Long Time from Work Is Risky For Men
By: melon | 07/01/2010When facing the unfair treatment in work, many people select tolerance to escape. But Swedish psychologists have reported that repressing anger for a long time for men would substantially increase the risk of heart disease.
There Is a Heated Debate on Whether Over-Alcohol Drinking is Good for Heart Health
By: melon | 07/01/2010Previous studies have shown that moderate drinking alcohol is good for heart health, excessive drinking or even alcohol abuse is harmful to our health. But in recently Spanish researchers pointed out that excessive drinking can contribute to heart health for men, it also can reduce the risk of heart disease. The announcement of the results immediately drew a lot of other scholars' question.
Ace Chemistry without the General Chemistry Textbook
By: Dr. Wayne Huang | 07/01/2010The rich-media General Chemistry Tutorial Series by Rapid Learning Center is a break-through learning system with scientific teaching method coupling with rich-media visualization and expert narration. In chemistry, it breaks down the entire course into 24 chapters, one chapter at a time, one hour per chapter in total of 24 hours.
China’s plan emerging to interrupt Tsangpo’s motion
By: Moon Ch. Deka | 06/01/2010The Northeast had a wonderful landscape with the broad Brahmaputra valley of Assam sandwiched by the Eastern Himalayas and Arakan Yuma ranges of hills. The Brahmaputra valley is the biggest in the region which has played an important role for the growth of the States and the region’s economy. Mostly, Tsangpo contribution is very significant as concern to the recycling of water potentiality of Brahmaputra basin and its biodiversity apart from basin’s ecological balancing.
Red wine can help prevent the tooth aging
By: melon | 06/01/2010As is known to all, moderate drinking of red wine can help prevent cardiovascular and nervous system diseases, as well as preventing certain cancers. The results published in the Food Chemistry journal from Italian scientist show that red wine is also beneficial to tooth.
It is easy to get disease in the too clean environment
By: melon | 06/01/2010U.S. scientists found that if the infants grow up with the too clean environment, it will affect their immune system development and have a high risk of getting heart disease when they are adulthood.
Ace your General Chemistry Exam in 24 Hours
By: Dr. Wayne Huang | 05/01/2010General Chemistry for many is a rather difficult subject to crack, but it is so important that you have to pass it in order to move forward with your college education.
Choosing the Right Middle School Science Project
By: Kayla Fay | 05/01/2010Science Projects were easier in elementary school. Back then, you could submit a model rocket, an egg sucked into a bottle, or a simple science report on electricity. It's different in middle school. Middle School science teachers want creative ideas, specific elements, in depth research, and detailed logs of the whole science fair process. But the first step to a middle school science project is figuring out which type of project the teacher wants!
In Bible versus Quran: they defiled the Priesthood by Marrying Foreign Women
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 05/01/2010 | Public SpeakingIn the Bible, Nehemiah said: Remember them, O my God, because they have defiled the priesthood, and the covenant of the priesthood, and of the Levites (by marrying foreign women). . In the whole Quran, the idiom: "foreign woman" is not mentioned therein; all women are equal in their rights and duty regardless of race, color, location etc.
In Quran: The outcome of those who say that King Solomon was Sinful
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 05/01/2010 | MetaphysicsAccording to the Islamic teachings (Quran and Hadith), anyone says or believes that King Solomon (or any other Prophet) did evil, did not follow his Lord, built high places for other gods because of his 700 foreign wives is categorized as disbeliever and he or she will dwell in the Eternal Hell in the Afterlife.
In Bible versus Quran: When the Elegant People entered into an Oath
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 05/01/2010 | PhilosophyThe Bible says that those who have knowledge and understanding clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of God. This story is not present therein in the Quran.
In Bible versus Quran: Nehemiah drove the high priest' son away from him?
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 04/01/2010 | MeditationIn the Bible, Nehemiah said: One of the sons of Joiada son of Eliashib the high priest was son-in-law to Sanballat the Horonite (he married a foreign woman). And I drove him away from me. In the Quran, Nehemiah and the "foreign women" are not mentioned therein. Also, there are no priests in Islam.
Is the Quran Anti-Israelite?
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 04/01/2010 | PoliticsIf the Quran is Anti-Israelite, and since King Solomon is an Israelite king, then the Quran would have exaggerated all the negative attributes of him that are mentioned in the Bible and would say: this is the behavior of the Israelite kings! But, the truth is the truth.
In Bible versus Quran: It is great evil if you marry foreign women
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 04/01/2010 | Ezines & NewslettersIn the Bible, Nehemiah said: Shall we then listen to you and do all this great evil and act treacherously against our God by marrying foreign women? In the whole Quran, the term "foreign woman" is not mentioned therein; all women are equal in respect to their rights and responsibilities regardless of race, color, location etc.
In Bible versus Quran: the foreign women made King Solomon Sinful
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 03/01/2010 | QuotesThe Bible says: "did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? Yet among many nations was there no king like him, and he was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel: nevertheless even him did foreign women cause to sin". In the Quran, anyone says or believes that King Solomon was sinful (because of his 700 wives) is categorized as disbeliever and he will dwell in the Eternal Hell in the Afterlife.
In Quran: The Prophet Muhammad's wives were remarkable women
By: Prof.dr. Ibrahim Khalil | 03/01/2010 | HomeschoolingIn the Quran Allah says: O you wives of the Prophet (Muhammad)! Whosoever of you is submissive, obedient unto Allah and His messenger and does right between herself and her Lord, Allah shall give her reward twice over a double reward; and Allah has prepared a noble provision for her, in Paradise, in addition to the twofold reward.